Program Award Fee Evaluation

1
(Program) Award Fee Evaluation
Schedule Performance 2nd Award Fee Period (Post
PDR through CDR)
Xxxxxx Yyyyyyy DCMA (XXXX) XXX-XXX-XXXX
2
Award Fee Evaluation for Schedule - DCMA
Evaluation Criteria Conformance to major
milestones Coordination with external
interdependent schedules Early identification
of (schedule) problem areas and demonstrated
performance in overcoming them.
3
Award Fee Evaluation for Schedule - DCMA
Ktrs Performance Strengths Conformance to major
milestones Contractor has been diligent in
meeting major program milestones as well as
software development, financial, and business
milestones. Extreme effort has been afforded to
meeting entrance criterias to assure milestone
accomplishment. Major milestones EPR 2 -
4May, IPR3 - 12 Sep, CDR 24 - 26 Oct. Software
development IDR2 25 - 27 Apr, I2 TRR 14 Aug,
IDR3 20 - 23 Sep. Financial CPRs of 22, Feb, 28
Apr, 23 May, 28, June, 27 Jul, 27 Sep
Oct. Award Fee (Period1) performed/participated
17 Apr. Coordination with external
interdependent schedules Contractor is very
responsive to the coordination of schedule
situations that could impact program progress.
The development of the I5 schedule risk scenarios
(high/moderate/low) to support external
dependencies situations is an example of their
commitment. (They held an External
Dependencies meeting 22 23 Aug to brief all
stakeholders.)
4
Award Fee Evaluation for Schedule - DCMA
Ktrs Performance Weaknesses Early identification
of (schedule) problem areas and demonstrated
performance in overcoming them. Sch. Performance
efficiency ITD (k) by IPT by month _at_ Summary
Level IPT Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Jul Aug Sep Oct H/W (xxx) (xxx)
(xx) xx (xxx) (xx) (xxx)
(xx) (xx) S/W (xxxx) (xxxx) (xxxx)
(xxxx) (xxxx) (xxx) (xxx) (xxx)
(xxx) SEIV (xxx) (xxx) (xxx) (xxx)
(xxx) xxx xx x xx TE
(xxx) (xxx) (xxx) (xxx) (xxx)
(xx) x (xx) (xx) Prog (xxx)
(xxx) (xxx) (xx) (xx) (xx)
(xx) (xxx) xx DS (xx) (xxx)
(xxx) (xxx) (xx) (x) (xx)
(xx) (xx) Totals (xxxx) (xxxx) (xxxx)
(xxxx) (xxxx) (xxx) (xxx) (xxxx)
(xxx) SPI-p 0.84 0.88 0.89 0.89 0.90
0.99 0.98 0.97 0.98 SPI-s 0.53 0.61
0.64 0.70 0.72 0.97 0.95 0.93 0.94
Jul - There was a Single Point Adjustment
(SPA) applied to schedule at the conclusion of
June activities. This reset program BCWS BCWP,
with contractor laying in Cost-to-Complete
schedule from this point forward.
5
Award Fee Evaluation for Schedule - DCMA
Impact of Krs Performance on Program
Execution Negative schedule variance, if it
continues, will contribute to additional cost
growth at the end of a program. Additional cost
growth will also occur if the contractor were to
add resources in an attempt to try and
gain/recover on schedule variance - never a good
solution. Corrective Actions This evaluator
recommends the contractor continue with current
development team and allow them the latitude of
coping/working/ correcting schedule situation.
The benefit of not adding resources at this time
is no additional cost/time impact to program for
resources ramping up, allows current team
opportunity to improve schedule efficiency
through their own software development
efficiency/expertise, shows belief in existing
team.