HW 3 Debriefing - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

HW 3 Debriefing

Description:

HW 3 -Debriefing. CH EN 5253. Design II. Terry A. Ring. Reactor ... Where to place Distillation Column in Loop? Case 1. Separation First before Reactor gives ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:87
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: che104
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: HW 3 Debriefing


1
HW 3 -Debriefing
  • CH EN 5253
  • Design II
  • Terry A. Ring

2
Reactor/Separator/Recycle
  • Reactor
  • n-penate ? iso-pentane
  • Separator
  • Distillation column
  • Difficult separation
  • a is small (a 1.1)
  • Large number of trays
  • R large
  • Qreboiler and Qcondenser are large
  • Recycle Loop
  • Where to place Distillation Column in Loop?

3
Case 1
Separation First before Reactor gives Pure
n-pentane to reactor
4
Setting Pressure for Recycle Loop
  • Issues to consider
  • Pressure at Condenser so that cooling water can
    be used for coolant
  • Higher Pressure reduces Vapor flow thus column
    diameter
  • Pressure in Reactor
  • Le Chatlier (equilibrium) is not effected
  • Kinetics are effected
  • Ci Pi/(RT)

CW ?T
5
Reactor Product Mole Fraction
Feed is n-pentane
6
Reactor Kinetics
Case 1 Case 2 3
7
Reactor
  • Temp 90 C
  • Diameter 1 meters
  • Length 20 meters

8
Case 1
Separation First before Reactor gives Pure
n-pentane to reactor
9
Distillation Column
  • 63 trays
  • R29.19
  • QRB 6.68e8 kJ/h
  • QC 6.74e8 kJ/h

10
Costs (Case 1)
Case I Equipment FOB cost Distillation
Columns (14) 7,712,713.55 Reactor
124,608.39 HX 88,793.49 Pump 7,467.16
TOTAL CAPITAL 7,933,582.59
11
Cost (Case 1)
Stream kJ/h /kg Annual Cost _at_50w/yr
operation Q2 6.74E08 0.0055 13,796,211.26
Q5 1.70E07 0.0055 347,838.65
CW ?T 16.66666667 K CP 4.184
J/(gK) Utilities Units Price/unit Annual Cost
_at_50w/yr operation CW /m3 Q1 6.68E08 0.01
1,046,573.30 Electricity kW /kW-h Annual Cost
_at_50w/yr operation Q3 1.52E-02 0.04 5.12
Total Utilities 15,190,628.33
Reboiler
Condenser
12
Case II
Separation after reactor gives mixed stream to
reactor
13
Reactor Product Mole Fraction
14
Reactor Kinetics
Case 1 Case 2 3
15
Reactor
  • Temp 190C
  • Diameter 1 meters
  • Length 20 meters

16
Distillation Column
  • 50 trays
  • R35.15
  • QRB 8.18e8 kJ/h
  • QC 8.33e8 kJ/h

17
Cost (Case 2)
Case II Efficient Distillation Equipment FOB
cost Distillation Columns (18) 7,360,049.85
Reactor 118,545.85 HX 548,024.36
Pump 8,341.45 TOTAL CAPITAL
8,034,961.52
Slightly more than case 1
18
Cost (Case 2)
Stream kJ/h /kg Annual Cost _at_50w/yr
operation Q7 7.46E08 0.0055 15,267,276.79
Q8 4.44E07 0.0055 909,191.30
CW ?T 16.66666667 K CP 4.184
J/(gK) Utilities Units Price/unit Annual Cost
_at_50w/yr operation CW kJ/h /m3 Q6 7.69E08
0.01 1,204,558.75 Electricity kW /kW-h Annu
al Cost _at_50w/yr operation Q4 3.83E-01 0.04
128.72 Total Utilities 17,381,155.56
Reboiler
Condenser
2 million more than case 1
19
Cost Comparison
  • Case 1
  • FOB equipment
  • 7,933,582.59
  • Utilities
  • 15,190,628.33
  • COM
  • 19,187,734.41
  • BEST
  • Case 2
  • FOB equipment
  • 8,034,961.52
  • Utilities
  • 17,381,155.56
  • COM
  • 21,406,531.57

20
Can it be done better?

21
Analysis
  • Distillation costs are the largest
  • In case 2, why are we distilling to high purity
    in bottom just to mix with impure feed?
  • Try an inefficient distillation column in Case 2
    for comparison with Case 1.
  • Keep reactor the same as Case 2.

22
Case III
Inefficient Distillation Bottom - impure
Separation after reactor gives mixed stream to
reactor
23
Distillation Column
  • 50 trays
  • R8.9
  • QRB 1.88e8 kJ/h
  • QC 2.11e8 kJ/h

Distillation bottoms is same composition as feed
to process.
24
Costs (Case 3)
Equipment FOB cost Distillation Columns (6)
2,453,349.95 Reactor 118,545.85 HX
1,077,748.41 Pump 8,205.70 TOTAL
CAPITAL 3,657,849.91
½ of Case 1
25
Cost (Case 3)
Stream kJ/h /kg Annual Cost _at_50w/yr
operation Q7 1.88E08 0.0055 3,847,738.62
Q8 44124751.6 0.0055 903,218.22
CW ?T 16.66666667 K CP 4.184
J/(gK) Utilities Units Price/unit Annual Cost
_at_50w/yr operation CW /m3 Q6 2.11E08 0.01
330,501.83 Electricity kW /kW-h Annual Cost
_at_50w/yr operation Q4 6.78E-01 0.04 227.72
Total Utilities 5,081,686.39
1/3 of Case 1
26
Cost Comparison
  • Case 1
  • FOB equipment
  • 7,933,582.59
  • Utilities
  • 15,190,628.33
  • COM
  • 19,187,734.41
  • Case 3
  • FOB equipment
  • 3,657,849.91
  • Utilities
  • 5,081,686.39
  • COM
  • 7,886,487.32
  • Best by far

27
Problems
  • HX
  • Minimum approach temperature negative
  • Temperature crossover in HX
  • Adjust stream temps to increase ?Tapproach
  • Want rating with low pressure drops
  • Heat Exchangers are enormous!
  • Keep U high so A is lower.
  • Increase ?Tlm if possible.
  • Distillation column is larger than cost equation
    limits use multiple units of max. size!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com