Title: Presentation of the Challenge Paper Land Tenure Reform and the Drylands
1Presentation of the Challenge Paper Land Tenure
Reform and the Drylands
- Eric Patrick
- UNDP Drylands Development Centre
2History of Paper
- Global Drylands Imperative Challenge common
perceptions, particularly amongst policy makers - Key drylands issues
- Poverty in the drylands,
- Sustainable development in the drylands
- Vulnerability Adaptation to climate change in
the drylands, - Biodiversity and the drylands
- Pastoralism and mobility in the drylands
- Land Tenure Reform in the drylands
- Available at www.undp.org/drylands
3Drylands Land Tenure Reform CP
- Synthesis of Regional Studies
- UNDP Side Event CCD COP6
- Book form
- Peer-review through workshop represent the
consensus of your discussions - Improved, translated, web disseminated
- Source document for audience-specific products
for advocacy cap building
4Overview
- Background concepts re risk management in
drylands in LDCs - Structure of Paper
- Challenges for LT reform in the drylands
- LT, drylands ecology risk management
- Traditional vs Modern LT worldviews
- Why LT reform is important for drylands
development - Policy Lessons
- Conclusions
5Value of land as a function of degree of aridity
and and choice of land use / livelihood system
6Drylands land use in LDCs is in an institutional
nether-zone between traditional risk management
systems and incipient modernization
7Drylands in LDCs at the interface of market
state failure implications commercial law
8Structure of Paper
- Section 1 Introduction to the challenges of LT
in the drylands (pgs 1 5) - Section 2 Why LT reform is important for
drylands development (pgs 5 7) - Section 3 Specificities of LT in the drylands
mismatch with modern LT concepts (pgs 7 9) - Sections 4 5 Policy lessons from LT reform in
the drylands (pgs 9 19) - Section 6 LT reform challenges revisited (pgs 19
21) - Section 7 Conclusions (Ongoing Challenges)
9LT reform in the drylands as six
challenges for land tenure policy practice
- Challenge 1 How can we ensure that LT reform
processes are truly participatory? - Challenge 2 What institutional changes are
required to ensure that the law is effective in
granting tenure security? - Challenge 3 How can national legislative
development processes reconcile the gaps
overlaps between traditional and modern systems
regulating access to and use of land and its
resources?
10Challenges (cont)
- Challenge 4 How can potential conflict over land
its resources in the drylands be minimized? - Challenge 5 How can the rights of marginalized
groups to land its resources be promoted and
protected? - Challenge 6 How can land tenure systems account
for the needs desires of various actors
(including the State) while still ensuring
environmental sustainability?
11S. 3 Land tenure, drylands ecology
traditional risk management
- About 40 earths surface ASAL a
disproportionately high of rural poor - Low vegetation cover thin topsoil high
rainfall intensity strong winds high
potential for degradation, slow rate of humus
formation - Therefore sustainable management critical
- Traditional systems generally highly efficient
wrt returns to labour or capital, generally low
density, flexible allowing manage relationship
between demand (animal) and supply (green flush
varying in space time) - Implied flexible institutions in terms of
regulation of access to land and its resources - Sustainable exploitation of areas of reliable dry
season resources
12Section 3 (cont)
- Aridity gradient, Land use Institutions
- Arid Shallow Groundwater oases, complex
water rights, nodes for livestock and trade
routes - Arid w/o Shallow GW highly mobile systems,
highly flexible arrangements reciprocal access,
opportunistic farming highly specialized risk
management - Semi-Arid Semi-mobile systems and/or
opportunistic farming or highly adapted farming
(Sahel, India) and/or high population densities
providing sufficient labour for SWC markets ie
N Nigeria intensification - Challenge Paper focuses on latter two plus
industrial agriculture in former Soviet Block
13Concepts underlying many traditional drylands
land use tenure systems
- Ecological necessity for flexibility,
adaptability diversity worldview reflected in
LT - Access via membership of group (claim via
identity, constructed), based on relationships,
reciprocity, widely accepted though can be
contested, may be generational, typically
unwritten, evolutionary, overlapping arrangements
(usufruct, tribal, religious etc) - Multiple users of same resources at different
times and/or in different ways, often based on
barter ie manure for crop stubble (much of the
Sahel) - Conflict resolution through direct negotiation,
compensation and/or appeal to a respected
individual
14Concepts underlying modern LT worldview
- Ownership access (right of disposal)
-
- Indicated by written title, validated and
enforced by state, pertains to an individual -
- Evolved environment reliable rainfall value is
in land (no need for mobility) nuclear units
production - Exchange via monetized markets, land as
collateral for borrowing capital to apply to
production, objective maximize return per unit
area - Conflict resolution through appeal to
independent representative of the State,
ensuring that the principles of the law of the
land apply equally to all citizens
15Sections 2 3 Why LT reform is critical for
drylands development
- Process of modernization and globalization since
colonial period resulted in clash of worldviews
delayed in drylands (Crown land) - Elements of traditional community educated,
connected to urban economy authorities may
exploit identity-based claims for resource
capture of dry season common reserves under
individual title via agents State - Overpopulation in higher rainfall areas leads to
inmigrations of land users with different
techniques, technologies and value systems often
conflict State enforces right of the hoe - Colonial and disease control borders have
undermined the viability of highly mobile risk
management systems
16Current status of drylands LT
- Policies based economic theories assumed to have
universal validity supported titling in name
head of household with right of disposal
typically resulting in landlessness for
marginalized groups (uneducated, women, youth,
poor) - Recognition by drylands users that breakdown of
traditional mechanism of regulating land use has
created a Tragedy of the Commons but often no
short-term alternative to mobile systems,
requiring mutual access - Kaijado Sub-division on paper but drought years
functionally reverts traditional system - Some areas past the point of no return due to
breakdown in social values which allow collective
action
17Section 4 Policy Lessons
- Modern legal systems are struggling to understand
support evolving customary LT regimes - Landscape-sensitive approaches are a necessity
for effective LT reform - LT security is difficult in uncoordinated
institutional environments - Collective private LT reforms can undermine
communal cooperation
18Section 4 Policy Lessons (cont)
- Collective and private LT reforms can undermine
communal cooperation - Privatizing pastoralism can lead to unregulated
resource use - Conflict in drylands limits options for LT reform
(catch 22?) - Water development in drylands can change land use
and bring conflict - LT reform requires effective legal systems
19Section 5 Summary of Policy Lessons
- Legal pluralism hybrid systems are common
- There does not need to be a Tragedy of the
Commons - Managing fragile environments requires a holistic
strategy - Tenure does not guarantee credit (market failure)
- LT security requires more than titles
20Sections 6 7 Conclusions
- Commit to transparency and public participation
in LT - Where appropriate, intervene in land markets to
ensure that distribution of public lands is fair,
while supporting the development of effective
accessible land information systems - Commit to developing systems of LT which respect
local customary traditions
21Sections 6 7 Conclusions (cont)
- Officially recognize that land its resources in
drylands may have multiple users - Ensure marginalized groups are benefiting from
land distribution programs where legal means
are accompanied by awareness-raising - Promote collaboration amongst all actors