Multiple-Group Threats to Internal Validity - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

Multiple-Group Threats to Internal Validity

Description:

– PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:89
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: csupo
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Multiple-Group Threats to Internal Validity


1
Multiple-Group Threats to Internal Validity
2
The Central Issue
  • When you move from single to multiple group
    research the big concern is whether the groups
    are comparable.
  • Usually this has to do with how you assign units
    (for example, persons) to the groups (or select
    them into groups).
  • We call this issue selection or selection bias.

3
The Multiple Group Case
Alternative explanations
Administer program
Measure outcomes
Measure baseline
Do not administer program
Measure outcomes
Measure baseline
Alternative explanations
4
Example
  • Compensatory education in math for 1st graders
  • Pre-post program-comparison group design
  • Measures (O) are standardized achievement tests
    (at start of grade 1 and start of grade 2 forms
    A B)

5
Selection Threats
  • Any factor other than the program that leads to
    posttest differences between groups.
  • For example, because of group differences, kids
    in one group watch Sesame Street more frequently
    and pick up more math concepts.

6
Selection-History Threat
  • Any other event that occurs between pretest and
    posttest that the groups experience differently.
  • For example, kids in one group pick up more math
    concepts because they watch more Sesame Street.

7
Selection-Maturation Threat
  • Differential rates of normal growth between
    pretest and posttest for the groups.
  • They are learning at different rates, even
    without program.

8
Selection-Testing Threat
  • Differential effect on the posttest of taking the
    pretest.
  • The test may have primed the kids differently
    in each group or they may have learned
    differentially from the test, not the program.

9
Selection-Instrumentation Threat
  • Any differential change in the test used for each
    group from pretest and posttest
  • For example, change due to different forms of
    test being given differentially to each group,
    not due to program

10
Selection-Mortality Threat
  • Differential nonrandom dropout between pretest
    and posttest.
  • For example, kids drop out of the study at
    different rates for each group.

11
Selection-Regression Threat
  • Different rates of regression to the mean because
    groups differ in extremity.
  • For example, program kids are disproportionately
    lower math scorers and consequently have greater
    regression to the mean.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com