MIS 435 Knowledge Management - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 32
About This Presentation
Title:

MIS 435 Knowledge Management

Description:

The Breakpoint: Buy-in Failure ... The second reason is failure of users to buy in to the project and fail to see ... Solving User Buy-In Problems ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:121
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: elianam
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: MIS 435 Knowledge Management


1
MIS 435Knowledge Management
  • Chapter 9
  • Step 5 Designing the Knowledge Management Team

2
Objectives
  • Design the Knowledge Management team
  • Identify sources of requisite expertise
  • Identify critical points of failure
    requirements, control, management buy-in, and end
    user buy-in.
  • Structure the Knowledge Management team
    organizationally, strategically, and
    technologically.
  • Balance technical and managerial expertise
    manage stakeholder expectations.
  • Resolve team-sizing issues

3
Building KM Systems
  • Built on expertise, skills, and insights of a
    diverse variety of stakeholders.
  • The quality of the collaborative relationship
    between these stakeholders determines the
    ultimate success of the system.

4
Building KM Systems (cont.)
  • Fifth step of the knowledge management road map.
  • This step involves the design of the knowledge
    management team that will build, implement,
    focus, and deploy the knowledge management
    system.

5
10 Step Roadmap
  • Analyze the existing infrastructure
  • Align Knowledge Management and business strategy
  • Design the KM infrastructure
  • Audit existing Knowledge assets systems
  • Design the KM team
  • Create the KM blueprint
  • Develop the KM system
  • Deploy, using results-driven incremental
    methodology
  • Manage change, culture, and reward structures
  • Evaluate performance

6
Sources of Expertise
  • Internal, centralized IT departments
  • Team-based local experts
  • External vendors, contractors, partners, and
    consultants
  • End users and front-line staff

7
Local Experts and Intradepartmental Gurus
  • Critical to have end-user involvement
  • Gurus are the best people the gauge the possible
    usefulness of each feature that your system has.
  • Gurus are the first to notice

8
Internal IT Departments
  • IT staff is needed because it is the IT staff
    that will bring the knowledge of
  • Infrastructure capabilities and limitations
  • Connectivity and compatibility among the
    team-based systems and the overall organizational
    technology infrastructure
  • Standardization issues across different
    platforms, applications and tools
  • Technicalities underlying the adaptation of these
    tools by various knowledge worker groups within
    the company

9
Nonlocal Experts and Extradepartmental Gurus
  • Laterality Laterality refers to the ability to
    cut across functional boundaries and relate to
    people from different areas.

10
Characteristics of External Expertise
  • Bridge
  • Learn
  • Value
  • Understanding
  • Creativity and Rationality

11
Characteristics of Communities of Practice
  • Multifunctional
  • Enacting a common purpose
  • Developing
  • Changes

12
Consultants
  • Internal consultants
  • External consultants

13
Consultant Considerations
  • Reputation
  • History of the consultant
  • Successful work
  • Competitor relations
  • Trust and confidence

14
Managers
  • Manager Involvement is Key

15
Team Composition and Selection Criteria
  • Functionality diversity can lead to only two
    possible outcomes, depending on how it is
    handled.
  • The first and most common is conflict and
    tension.
  • The second is characterized by synergy,
    creativity and innovation.

16
Core Team
  • The core team should consist of the following
    participants
  • Knowledge champion or senior manager
  • IT staff
  • User delegates representing the core business
    area that is going to depend on the Knowledge
    Management system.

17
KM Team Structure
18
Team Life Span and Sizing Issues
  • Two viewpoints on the future of
  • Knowledge Management
  • One belief is that Knowledge Management will
    continue to depend on people to manage knowledge
    throughout the lifetime of the organization.
  • The second is that Knowledge Management is a
    self-eliminating initiative.

19
The Project Leader
  • The Knowledge Management project leader helps
    members of the team understand the projects
    mission and align their efforts with the
    companys overall goals and objectives.
  • A leader must resolve internal dynamics, serve as
    a translator, and take charge of delegation.

20
The Knowledge Management Teams Project Space
  • One of the first tasks that the Knowledge
    Management team needs to undertake is that of
    understanding the projects strategic intent,
    organizational context, technological
    constraints, monetary limitations, and short-term
    as well as long-term goals.

21
Some Questions that the Knowledge Management Team
should answer collectively
  • 1. What is the companys envisioned strategic and
    performance goal?
  • 2. Where does the KM team fit in the
    organizational hierarchy?
  • 3. Does the KM project fit vertically or
    horizontally in the value chain?
  • 4. What are the financial and time constraints
    for the project?
  • 5. What are the technical limitations of existing
    technology platforms?

22
Questions
  • 6. What are the critical elements in terms of
    skills, people, and knowledge that are still
    missing in the team?
  • 7. What are the immediate payoffs?
  • 8. What level of commitment does the team have
    from senior management and from the users?
  • 9. What are the cultural blockades that should
    be expected?
  • 10. Has any competitor or non-competing firm
    implemented a project like this?

23
Managing Stakeholders Expectations
  • The second task, after the Knowledge Management
    has decided on an initial set of objectives, is
    to present this work formally to various
    stakeholder groups.
  • This interaction can help the team compare the
    projects objective with stakeholder expectations
    and perceptions.

24
Chemistry
  • Chemistry within a team is an essential but often
    overlooked consideration.
  • Choice of individuals aside, the features of the
    team are determined best by considering all of
    its members taken together.
  • Consider how well a teams potential members fit
    together as a whole.

25
Case Study How KM was implemented at Heineken
  • Heineken designed a number of scenarios to see
    whether its corporate office could become more
    processes oriented.
  • Three questions that needed to be answered
  • 1. What is the added value of the corporate
    office?
  • 2. What strategic processes does it apply?
  • 3. How can the corporate office be organized
    around these processes?

26
Heineken
  • The Company defined strategic processes of the
    corporate office.
  • Those directly related to the strategy of the
    company.
  • Those semipermanent in character, changing only
    when the strategy of the company as a whole
    changes.
  • Those making a multifunctional contribution to
    the entire company that rises above the business
    units and is divisible into separate strategic
    processes.

27
Heineken
  • Heineken created several scenarios
  • Strengthening worldwide market presence
  • Stimulating operational excellence
  • Optimizing management performance
  • Maximizing company financial leverage

28
Heineken Results
  • The corporate office was no longer organized by
    functional disciplines but instead they were
    organized in teams around the companys strategic
    processes.
  • The delivery of this responsibility and,
    therefore, the added value and accountability
    became more explicit and clearly defined.
  • Teams were connected in smart networks, where
    workers work together in soft networks or people
    and knowledge.

29
Highways to Failure
  • The Breakpoint Buy-in Failure
  • Lack of an active role of the top management has
    been identified as the primary reason that many
    projects fail.
  • The second reason is failure of users to buy in
    to the project and fail to see why they need the
    system.

30
Controlling and Balancing Requirements
  • There are some areas where the Knowledge
    Management project manager, have significant
    control. However, there are some areas in which
    they have little or no control.
  • Customer Mandate refers to the level of buy-in
    from the ultimate users, who in effect are the
    systems customers.
  • This is a high risk area over which managers have
    little control.

31
Categorizing Risks in Building the Knowledge
Management System Proactively

Importance of the risk
High
Moderate
Low High
Project Manager Level of Control
32
Solving User Buy-In Problems
  • This problem can be tackled effectively by
    including representatives from the actual
    would-be end-user community in the Knowledge
    Management team.
  • Management must be actively involved to ensure
    that senior managers actually buy into the
    project and that the bigger picture that
    management has in mind is well accommodated and
    incorporated.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com