Title: Religion and Social Change
1Religion and Social Change
- Both Functionalists and Marxists believe that
religion helps to prevent change, - it is a conservative force maintaining the staus
quo for functionalists - it is part of the false consciousness process
for Marxists - Weber believed that religion was a force for
change and developed a theory that protestentism
was responsible for capitalism developing. This
was developed in his work - 'The protestant ethic and spirit of capitalism'
2Religion and Social Change
- Lutheranism
- For Lutherans religion was more than just going
to church. - It was a life long vocation affecting every
sphere of life- work, rest and play - People worked hard and made money - but they
werent allowed to spend on pleasures and
therefore ploughed profits back into businesses
3Religion and Social Change
- Calvinism
- Believed in predestination
- i.e. you do not know whether you are going to
heaven or hell - Calvinists worked hard to try and convince
themselves and others that they were part of the
elect bound for heaven
4Religion and Charisma
- A second link between religion and social change
has to do with how sects develop and change - 2 factors help in the development of sects
- 1. A group of people find that their existing
religion is not meeting their needs. - 2. A leader claims to have a new answer. This
leader is often charismatic
5Religious Organisations
- Three interesting issues about charisma
- 1.
- It is used widely to describe a range of people -
- actors, rock stars, teachers
6Religious Organisations
- 2.
- It is often seen as dangerous -
- a leader can make people do things they wouldnt
normally do - e.g. Hitler, Jimmy Jones
7Religious Organisations
- 3.
- Groups with charismatic leaders are often short
lived - It is difficult to maintain the charisma element
- The movement dies out when the leader does - or
- becomes more bureaucratic
8New Religious Movements (NRM's)
- Wallis 1984
- argues that the last 30 years in the USA and
Europe have witnessed a rapid growth in NRM's.
This appears to be going hand in hand with the
decline in established churches, suggesting that
beliefs are not so much declining as changing
9New Religious Movements (NRM's)
- Wallis 1984 - 3 types of NRM
- 1. World Accomodating
- The text book gives little on this format,
suffice to say that such groups stress the
personal matter of religious belief and practice. - Members of such groups (Subud,
Neo-Pentecostalism), usually live 'normal' lives
i.e. live and work in the same way as the
majority of population.
10New Religious Movements (NRM's)
- 2. World-rejecting movements
- The Moonies are a typical example
- Members are required to reject the world and its
ills - They cut off former ties - friends, relatives,
possessions - Often live in communities
- Often have charismatic leaders
- Moral panics about brainwashing etc are common
- Their membership is very small
11New Religious Movements (NRM's)
- 3.World Affirming Religions
- Scientology is typical of this format
- The world is one of opportunity
- We can be more successful and become better
people - Many involve expensive training programmes
- Members live in the normal world
12New Religious Movements (NRM's)
- Themes - Beliefs
- Both world rejecting and world affirming
movements combine different beliefs e.g. the
Unification Church combines Christianity and
eastern religions. - The sociologists job is to explain why people
believe what they do without justifying it. - Read the article on page 637 concerning the work
of Eileen Barker. In a famous study in the 1970's
she used a triangulation approach to study the
Moonies. Here she tries to take some of the fear
away from cult-watching.
13New Religious Movements (NRM's)
- Themes - Membership
- World-rejecting NRM's are have a more restricted
membership than world affirming ones. - This is often because they recruit less widely
and have more control over members. - There is a popular fear of such groups - with
allegations of brain washing etc. But Barkers
study of the Moonies shows that they were very
unsuccessful in keeping members. - World rejecting NRM's usually appeal more to
young people and this heightens the fear of
parents who see their children as being
'captured'.
14New Religious Movements (NRM's)
- Themes - New Age Movements
- The 1980's and 90's has seen the growth in so
called New Age movements - the majority of which
are cults based on such things as spiritual
healing, paganism and ecology.. They tend to be
client and audience style cults. - Many of these movements are hybrids of different
belief systems and rely on the media to get their
message across.
15New Religious Movements (NRM's)
- As a result we have less small enclosed
communities of believers and more 'religious
milieu'. - This fits with the post modernist view of
religion taking on a more "pick'n'mix" mentality
- i.e. there is a lot of choice and consumers
pick the elements to form their own belief system
- often mixing 'mainstream' beliefs with others
16New Religious Movements (NRM's)
- The appeal of NNRM's
- When we hear of the stories Waco and Jonestown
etc the usual question is why? - Sociologists are particularly interested in what
makes people join and support NRM's
17New Religious Movements (NRM's)
- Suggested answers
- 1. The decline in organised religion has left a
gap in the market - 2. Relative deprivation -
- not necessarily economic - some feel that
'normal' life is not giving them satisfaction
and therefore seek it elsewhere - 3. NRM's appeal to particular groups of people
18New Religious Movements (NRM's)
- World-Rejecting NRM's and the young unattached
- Adolescents and young adults are targeted
- Offer some certainty at an otherwise uncertain
time. - No dependants makes membership easier
- Radical beliefs appeal to the young
- Rapid turnover of members as a result of reliance
on young
19New Religious Movements (NRM's)
- World-Affirming NRM's and the older attached
- Provide a spiritual component for those
disillusioned with a rational world - Provide techniques to increase wealth, happiness
etc. - Provide opportunities for people to work on their
inner selves - Heelas (1992) calls them cults for capitalism