Title: The Warren, Burger,
1The Warren, Burger, Rehnquist Courts
2Warren Court Civil Rights
- Integration of schools ? equal opportunity for
success, employment - The Warren Court revealed itself as a liberal,
activist court - Liberal court for human, individual, civil
rights - Activist court the Supreme Court assumes
responsibility for the racial status of public
education in the nation - Reject Jeffersonian Ideal government that
governs least governs best - The Warren court view States hinder the
improvement of justice in America - Brown ? therefore ? desegregation of the entire
country - The federal govt has finally started to enforce
the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments
3(No Transcript)
4Attacks on the Warren Court
- The John Birch Society a far right wing
organization - Conducted an essay contest on Grounds for the
Impeachment of Earl Warren 1961 - Congress Responds with the Civil Rights
Acts1957, 1964, 1965
5Mapp v. Ohio (1961)
- Protected the accused against illegal search and
seizure (4th Amendment)
6Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)
- Guaranteed the right to counsel in criminal
procedure as required by the 6th amendment - Impact public defender offices
7Miranda v. Arizona (1966)
Determined that individuals must be notified of
their protection against self-incrimination and
their right to counsel according to the 5th
amendment. Impact guidelines established for
custodial interrogations.
8Religion under the Warren Court Engel v. Vitale
(1962)
- Background Small, non-denominational prayer for
school children in public schools Almighty God,
we acknowledge our dependence upon Thee, and beg
Thy blessings upon us, our teachers, and our
country. Amen - Court ruled Even under non-compelling
conditions of the prayer, the prayer was
unconstitutional as a religious activity by
nature (therefore violating the 1st amendment).
Does the prayer violate the First Amendment
establishment of religion clause? - Legal Impact The establishment clause of the
First Amendment to the Constitution was used to
eliminate different kinds of out-of-context
religious activities - Religion had, up to this point in history, been a
part of public ceremony
9National Shift from Liberal to Conservative
- 1960s liberal - Civil Rights, President Andrew
Johnsons Great Society, U.S. GNP up 31 - The Vietnam War The U.S. expected to win, but
it was costly, long, brutal a failure - U.S. focused on international affairs rather than
domestic economic and racial problems ? anti-war
movement - The Nixon Presidency (1969-1974) the Watergate
Scandal - ? Trust in federal government diminished
- Economy of 1970s inflation, recession,
unemployment, huge deficit in balance-of-payments,
materialism and consumerism - ? People hated excessive taxation and
regulation - Energy Crisis 1973-4 ? Distrust of a liberal,
activist government the people of the U.S. wanted
deregulation of economy by govt
10Burger Court
- Nixon appointed Warren Burger as Chief Justice in
1969 - Nixon pledged to appointed a strict
constructionist - But became evident Burger wasnt going to reverse
activist trend of Warren Court. - Supported busing
- NYT v. U.S. (Pentagon Papers case)
- U.S. v. Nixon (Nixons tapes)
- Court invalidated then reinstated the death
penalty - And.
11Roe v. Wade (1973)
- Question before the Court Does the Constitution
embrace the right of a woman to have an abortion? - Decision 7 2 Yes, there is a right to privacy
protected by the Fourteenth Amendment - Gave women total autonomy during first trimester,
but different state laws for second and third
trimesters - Affected legislation in 46 states
12Rehnquist Court
- Conservative
- Increasingly
- pro-life
- Sandra Day OConnor appointed
13Rehnquist Court Abortion
- Webster v. Reproductive Health Services (1989) 5
4 decision - Chief Justice Rehnquist majority decision
- Roe v. Wade was not explicitly overruled, but
abortion restrictions were upheld - Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992) a
re-examination of Roe - Decision 5 4, upheld the validity of Roe ?
Rehnquist dissents
14The 2000Election and the Rehnquist Court
15The Butterfly Ballot
16Bush v. Gore
- Question Did the Florida Supreme Court violate
the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of
the Constitution by allowing hand recounts
without set standards? - Decision (7 2 ruling)
- Recounts in Florida unconstitutional ? halted
- Procedure of recounting might not be the same for
each county denied equal protection under the
14th Amendment - Significance of the decision
- The individual votes of the people need not be
recounted, as the US does not conduct a direct
election - This part of the decision is going against the
principle of one person, one vote established
in Baker v. Carr (1962) of the Warren Court