Climate Change: Plant Disease Management Stella Melugin - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Climate Change: Plant Disease Management Stella Melugin

Description:

Climate Change: Plant Disease Management Stella Melugin Coakley Oregon State University 2003 Australasian Plant Pathology 32, 157-165 Elements of Global Change ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:634
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: cleanairc3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Climate Change: Plant Disease Management Stella Melugin


1
Climate Change Plant Disease Management
  • Stella Melugin Coakley
  • Oregon State University

2
Plant Pathogens in aChanging World
Harald Scherm University of Georgia, Athens
Stella M. Coakley Oregon State University,
Corvallis
3
2003 Australasian Plant Pathology 32, 157-165
4
Elements of Global Change
  • Climate change--- temperature and moisture
  • Atmospheric trace gases (CO2, O3, CH4, etc.)
  • Land use/ land cover changes
  • Invasive species
  • Biodiversity loss

5
Examples from history
  • Asian chestnut blight fungus
  • Eliminated American chestnut and with it, several
    phytophagous insects
  • In Australia, Phytophthora cinnamoni
  • Converted large areas of Eucalyptus forest to
    monocot-dominated open savanna
  • Eliminated potential nest sites and food for many
    animals

6
How may climate change impact disease management?
  • Pathogens are very dependent on environment for
    disease development
  • Pathogens often exist at low levels but erupt
    into epidemics rapidly under favorable conditions
  • Prevention is preferable to management

7
Focus on climate warming with increased
precipitation
  • Influence pathogen
  • Increased overwintering may gt severity
  • e.g. Mediterranean oak decline, Dutch elm
    disease, wheat stripe rust
  • Influence host
  • Rapid growth, increased canopy humidity
  • Influence vectors of pathogens

8
Mechanisms of impact
  • More rapid pathogen development
  • Fungus on groundnut
  • More rapid vector development
  • Vector (Toxoptera sp.) of Citrus tristeza virus
  • Increased overwintering of pathogen/vector
  • Barley yellow dwarf, potato leafroll virus,
    yellows virus, Oak root rot

9
Mechanisms of impact (cont)
  • Increased pathogen transmission
  • Fusarium moniliforme on Capri fig
  • Fungus on oilseed rape
  • Increased host susceptibility
  • Phytophthora on soybean
  • Potato virus Y on potato
  • Foliar rust on oats (resistance inactive)

10
Evidence of aphid vectors
responding toclimate warming
  • Aphids in Britain
  • Suction trap network since 1964
  • First spring catch related to winter T
  • Advance of spring flight phenology by 3 to 6 days
    in past 25 years (Fleming Tatchell 1995)
  • During same period, T increased by 0.4oC

Harrington (2002)
11
Most severe and least predictable disease
outbreaks
  • When geographic ranges are altered by climate
    change
  • Allows formerly disjunctive species and
    populations to converge
  • Introduction of pathogen that spreads to new
    hosts (sudden oak death, Dutch Elm disease)
  • Introduction of new plant which encounters
    pathogens native to area (wheat to Brazil, coffee
    to Asia)

12
Limited Prospects for Finding Climate Change
Fingerprints for Plant Diseases
  • Few standardized long-term data sets
  • Overwhelming influence of management unmanaged
    systems rarely monitored
  • Few disease data sets that focus on phenology
    rather than disease intensity
  • Overwhelming influence of localized variables
    (e.g. moisture) that may vary more under climate
    change

13
Challenges for Modeling Effects of Climate Change
on Plant Diseases
  • Uncertainty in climate change projections IPCC
    1996 ?T 1.0 to 3.5oC by 2100
  • IPCC 2001 ?T 1.4 to 5.8oC
  • Nonlinear response mean temperature insufficient
    to make accurate predictions
  • Evolution pathogens likely to adapt genetically

14
Where should attention be focused?
  • On introduction of new material
  • History of host and pathogen populations at site
    of origin
  • Prevention of pathogen introduction may not be
    possible but early intervention may prevent more
    extensive losses

15
Invasive Pests
  • Are both cause and consequence of global change
  • In US, cost 137 billion per year 20 due to
    exotic plant pathogens (Pimentel et al. 2000)
  • By 1991, 239 exotic plant pathogen species in US
  • Rate of introduction
  • 1940-70 lt5 per decade (NRC, 2002)
  • 1990s considerably higher

16
Exotic Plant Pathogens First Detected in the US
in the1990s
  • Field crops
  • Sorghum ergot
  • Soybean rust (Hawaii)
  • Karnal bunt
  • Forests
  • Eurasian leaf rust of poplar
  • Leaf spot of hybrid poplar
  • Sudden oak death
  • Needle blight of spruce
  • Ornamentals
  • Powdery mildew of Sedum
  • Powdery mildew of Nandina
  • Powdery mildew /f poinsettia
  • Fruits and vegetables
  • Cucurbit aphid-borne yellows virus
  • Cucurbit yellow stunting disorder virus
  • Powdery mildew of tomato
  • Phytophthora rot of cabbage
  • Plum pox virus
  • Tomato yellow leaf curl
  • Citrus canker

17
(No Transcript)
18
1) Can Pest Invasions be Predicted?
  • Based on life-history attributes of pest
  • Based on invasibility of environment

National Research Council (2002)
19
2) Macroevolution Following Introduction of
Exotic Pathogens
Hybridization between related allopatric species
? new pathogen species
  • Hybrids with combined host range of both parents
    Melampsora ? columbiana on poplar Newcombe et
    al. (2000) Mycol. Res. 104
  • Hybrids with new host specificity Phytophthora
    sp. on alder, a hybrid between P. cambivora and a
    P. fragariae-like species Brasier et al. (1999)
    PNAS 96

20
Conclusions
  • Challenge will be rapid identification and
    management of new diseases
  • Tools for management will change under changing
    global conditions, e.g. water quality issues may
    preclude use of certain chemical controls
    phase-out of methyl bromide
  • Important challenges remain in developing
    meaningful models of disease intensity and crop
    losses under climate change

21
Conclusions (cont)
  • Important lessons can be learned from studying
    patterns of pathogen invasions and pathogen
    evolution in response to global change
  • Where hosts go, pathogens will follow
  • Best management will be from exclusion or early
    detection and elimination where possible
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com