Title: Li/Lt6 Phonology and Morphology
1Li/Lt6 Phonology and Morphology
- Lecture 1
- Phonemes and abstract representations
2Todays topics
- Two theories of mind
- Evidence for abstract mental representations
- Competence vs performance
- Priming
- Phonological alternations
- Evidence for phonemes
- Neutralization
- Language games
- Speech errors
- Loanword phonology and L2 transfer
- Orthography
- Perception
- Discrimination tasks
3Two theories of mind
4The reductionist position
- Popular lay intuition that we store and
manipulate surface forms - Priming effects by individual voice
- Once we introduce mechanisms for describing
word-word correspondences into the grammar, it
may be possible to dispense with underlying
representations altogether (see proposals by
Burzio 1998, Bybee 2001). (Sumner 2003) - connectionists
5Evidence for abstract URs
6Psychological realitySapir 1933
oak tree
- Basic points
- speech sounds are stored in the mind as abstract
categories (phonemes) - These are not always identical to their surface
manifestations ((allo)phones) - Speakers think of language in terms of phonemes,
not phones (i.e. phonemes have psychological
reality) - Evidence
- Spelling Alex Thomas (Nootka)
- writes lthi, hugt for he, h?
- writes ltC!gt for 2 different things he was taught
(T!, R) - Intuitions
- Southern Paiute
- Tony says pA??BAh for at the water
- Asked to divide the word into syllables, he says
pA? pAh - /p t k/ ? ß r ? / V _ no /ß r ?/
- Sarcee
- John Whitney feels that dìníh it makes a sound
has a final /t/, whereas dìníh this one does
not (cf. dìníth - í the one who)
maple tree
TREE
NB Sapir needs external evidence to decide if the
two forms he hears as identical are actually
different phonetically
7L1 competence performance
TINk!
by the time infants are starting productive use
of language they can already discriminate almost
all of the phonological contrasts of their native
language. While they cannot yet produce
adult-like forms, they appear, in many respects,
to have adult-like representations, which are
reflected, among other things, in their
vociferous rejections of adult imitations of
their phonologically impoverished productions
(Faber and Best 1994266-7)
Cruttenden 1985
Did you say TINk?
No!!
- Preferential Looking paradigm (Hirsh-Pasek and
Golinkoff 1993) - 19-month old infants comprehension of sentence
like Big Bird is hugging Cookie Monster. Where
is Big Bird hugging Cookie Monster? - Infants (who cant speak yet) looked longer at
correct video
8competence vs. performance
- intoxicated speech of the captain of the Exxon
Valdez (Johnson, Pisoni, and Bernacki 1990) - Observed effects
- misarticulation of /r/ and /l/
- final devoicing
- Deaffrication
- Performance problem, not different grammar
- attempts at producing adult phen pen collected
from a 15-month-old child in a 30-minute period
(Ferguson 1986) - mã?, v?, dedn, hIn, mbõ, pHIn,
tHn?tHn?tHn?, bah, dhau?, buã
9competence vs. performance
- Bedore, Leonard, and Gandour 1994
- 4 yr old girl substitutes dental click for s z S
Z tS dZ - She can initially imitate the fricatives, but not
produce them on her own - After a short training session, she starts to
produce s correctly - She then immediately gets all the others right
- the rapid rate of change observed in the childs
phonological system seems consistent with a
phonological learning model in which the child
has adult-like underlying phonological
representations (283)
10Priming
- Colloquial Dutch optionally neutralizes obstruent
voicing with the clitic -der her - /ik kœs der/ I kiss her ? ik kœzd?r ik
kœst?r - /ik kiz der/ I kiss her ? ik kizd?r ik
kist?r - Do speakers respond faster to targets that match
the voicing of a prime? - Lexical decision task, with following sequence of
events - PRIME (verbclitic construction)
- TARGET (verbal infinitive or nonword)
- DECISION (is the target a legitimate word of
Dutch?) - Results
- Responses were faster when voicing of prime
corresponded to voicing of UR - Conclusion
- Both variants of a verb are not stored in the
lexicon
Jongman, Allard. 2004. Phonological and Phonetic
Representations The Case of Neutralization.
Proceedings of the 2003 Texas Linguistics Society
Conference Coarticulation in Speech Production
and Perception, Augustine Agwuele, Willis Warren,
and Sang-Hoon Park, eds., pp. 9-16.
11Japanese g? and rendaku (Ito and Mester 2003)
- Rendaku C ? voi / __ X
- kami-kaze vs. ori-gami
- Lymans Law X does not contain voi, -son
- taba bundle satsutaba wad of bills
(satsu-daba) - g-weakening non-initial /g/ ? ?
- gaijiN foreigner
- koku?ai abroad
- Rule interaction
- R feeds GW /orikami/ ? ori?ami
- R counterfeeds GW /sakatoge/ reverse thorn/ ?
sakato?e
If GW preceded R it would change g to ? and
thereby feed R, resulting in sakado?e
12Evidence for abstract phonemes
13Phonemes are also abstractions
Ambiguity German devoicing
Rad
Rat
?At
nom. gen.
?Ad?s ?At?s
? voiced uvular fricative cf. French, Hebrew
14Perception
15Categorical perception VOT
- Categorization functions for synthetic stimuli
ranging from b to p. Open circles indicate
the percent of times that each stimulus was
perceived as b, and the filled circles indicate
the percent of times that each stimulus was
perceived as p. (Lisker and Abramson 1970)
16Hearing Cs that arent there IThe McGurk effect
- When hearing the sound BA, while seeing GA
- most adults (98) think they are hearing DA
McGurk, H. and MacDonald, J. 1976. Hearing lips
and seeing voices. Nature 264746-8.
17Hearing Cs that arent there IIV formants ? ? C
?
Identification of burstless stops with different
vowels transitions areall you need!
Delattre, Liberman, Cooper (1955) JASA 27,
769-773
18Phonemes vs. allophones
- t th in English (allophonic) vs. Thai
(phonemic) - Speakers produce consistent and finely controlled
distinctions between allophones - When measured experimentally, subjects typically
distinguish allophones at above chance levels,
but much less easily and well than phoneme pairs - for aspiration in English, see Pegg Werker
1997, Whalen et al. 1997, Utman et al. 2000,
Jones 2001
19L2 transfer
20Phoneme vs. allophone
- Phonemes can distinguish meaning (flight
fright) - Allophones dont
21Orthography
22Phonological mediation
- In semantic disambiguation tasks, the phonology
of a word interfered with the disambiguation
process even when the reader had access to its
semantic representations (Van Orden 1987). - reader was presented with IS THIS A FLOWER?
- followed by the presentation of ROWS
- Correct response accuracy for such
sentence-target pair was significantly lower when
the targets shared a phonological representation
with a word neighbor that semantically fit the
question (i.e., ROSE). - when the subject had the ability to resolve the
task with the correct answer (NO) phonological
information intervened.
23Letter priming
- Lee and Turvey 2003
- forms with deleted silent letters (SALM, COLUM)
prime better than forms with deleted pronounced
letters (COUSI) - Conclusion phonological representations are
activated during visual word recognition.
24Speech errors
25Types of speech errors
26Language games
27Backwards English
- Cowan Leavitt 1992 study of one woman
- Example garage graž reversed as žarg
- Evidence that she reverses phonemes (rather than
letters) - 1. no silent letters pronounced in reverse forms
- 2. homographs were always pronounced differently
(two ltggt's in garage) - Not functioning as reversed tape recorders
- Compound units (diphthongs and affricates) were
consistently preserved as units rather than being
reversed. - choice tšojs was reversed as sojtš (rather
than sjošt)
28Verlan
- Procedure
- Invert syllables (in polysyllabic words)
- Lenvers the reverse ? verlan, femme woman
? meuf - Cf. Spanish Vesre, which inverts syllable order,
e.g. muchacho ? chochamu - Drop final vowel
- What to do with monosyllables?
- Include final optional schwa, if there is one
- moi mwa me ? ouam wam
- fou fu crazy ? ouf
- Viens chez ouam soir-ce y'a une teuf de ouf, je
suis avec l'autre nasbo, j ai du sky et la race
de beuh - Come to my place tonight there is a huge party,
I'm with this hot chick, I've got some whiskey
and a lot of weed - teuf - fête party, nasbo bonasse hot chick,
sky whiskey, beuh herbe weed - Key for us monosyllables ? inversion of phonemes
29Conclusions
- Words are not acoustic signals, but rather
abstract mental representations of language. - Words in turn are composed of abstract phonemes,
which are again abstract mental symbols rather
than elements of the physical world.
30References
- Bedore, L., L. Leonard, and Jack Gandour. 1994.
The substitution of a click for sibilants a case
study. Clinical linguistics phonetics
8.4283-293. - Bishop, D. and J. Robson. 1989. Accurate non-word
spelling despite congenital inability to speak
phoneme-grapheme conversion does not require
subvocal articulation. British Journal of
Psychology 80.11-13. - Burzio, Luigi. 1998. Multiple Correspondence.
Lingua 10479-109. - Bybee, Joan. 2001. Phonology and Language Use.
Cambridge Cambridge University Press. - Cowan, Nelson L. Leavitt. 1992. Speakers'
access to the phonological structure of the
syllable in word games. In M. Ziolkowski, M.
Noske, K. Deaton (eds.), Papers from the 26th
Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic
Society, Volume 2 The Parasession On the
Syllable in Phonetics and Phonology. Chicago
Chicago Linguistic Society. - Cruttenden, Alan. 1985. Language in infancy and
childhood, second edition. Manchester Manchester
University Press. - Delattre, P., Alvin Liberman, F. Cooper. 1955.
Acoustic loci and transitional cues for
consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of
America 27.4769-773. - Faber, Alice Cathi Best. 1994. The perceptual
infrastructure of early phonological development.
In R. Corrigan, G. Iverson, S. D. Lima, eds.,
The reality of phonological rules, pp. 261-280.
Philadelphia John Benjamins. - Ferguson, Charles. 1986. Discovering sound units
and constructing sound systems its childs
play. In Invariance and variability of speech
processes, Joseph Perkell and Dennis Klatt, eds.,
36-51. Hillsdale, NJ Erlbaum. - Hirsh-Pasek, Kathy, Roberta Golinkoff. 1993.
Skeletal supports for grammatical learning What
the infant brings to the language learning task.
In C. K. Rovee-Collier L. P. Lipsitt, eds.,
Advances in infancy research, Vol. 8, pp.
299-338. Norwood, NJ Ablex. - Ito, Junko and Armin Mester. 2003. Japanese
morphophonemics markedness and word structure.
Cambridge, MA MIT Press. - Johnson, Keith, Dominic Pisoni, and R. Bernacki.
1990. Do voice recordings reveal whether a person
is intoxicated? A case study. Phonetica
47.3-4215-37. - Jongman, Allard. 2004. Phonological and Phonetic
Representations The Case of Neutralization.
Proceedings of the 2003 Texas Linguistics Society
Conference Coarticulation in Speech Production
and Perception, Augustine Agwuele, Willis Warren,
and Sang-Hoon Park, eds., pp. 9-16. - Krifi et al. 2003 phonological features shared
between (phonological correspondents of)
graphemes increase priming effects - Lee, Chang and M. Turvey. 2003. Silent Letters
and Phonological Priming. Journal of
Psycholinguistic Research 32.3313-333. - Lisker, Leigh and Arthur Abramson. 1970. The
voicing dimension some experiments in
comparative phonetics. Proceedings of the Sixth
International Congress of Phonetic Sciences
(1967), Prague. - McGurk, H. and MacDonald, J. 1976. Hearing lips
and seeing voices. Nature 264746-8. - Olson, A. and Alfonso Caramazza. 2004.
Orthographic structure and deaf spelling errors
syllables, letter frequency, and speech.
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A
57.3385-417. - Pegg, J. Janet Werker. 1997. Adult and infant
perception of two English phones. Journal of the
Acoustical Society of America 10237423753.