Strengthening Families to Keep Children Safe from Harm - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

Strengthening Families to Keep Children Safe from Harm

Description:

Juvenile arrest rates 130 per 1000 children. Teen pregnancy 16% of ... in West Baltimore. 10. Overview of Program. Family Connections, Baltimore, Maryland ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:63
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: DianeDeP8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Strengthening Families to Keep Children Safe from Harm


1
Strengthening Families to Keep Children Safe from
Harm
  • Diane DePanfilis, Ph.D.
  • Associate Professor of Social Work
  • Co-Director, University of Maryland, Baltimore
  • Center for Families
  • In Harms Way Breaking the Cycle of Drugs and
    Violence against Children and Families
  • Community Issues Forum
  • November 9, 2001

2
Key Points
  • Strong association between substance abuse and
    child maltreatment
  • Strengthening families in their communities will
    increase protective and decrease risk factors

3
Why is this important?
  • Established connection between substance abuse
    and child maltreatment.
  • Children of substance abusing parents more likely
    to be maltreated.
  • Maltreating parents are more likely to abuse
    alcohol or other drugs.
  • Children of substance abusers, particularly
    maltreated children, are at high risk for abusing
    drugs, school problems, behavioral problems.

4
What harm do children face in West Baltimore?
  • Poverty up to 58 of children live in poverty.
  • Truancy 39 miss gt than 20 days/year.
  • Child abuse neglect 39 per 1000 children
  • Juvenile arrest rates 130 per 1000 children
  • Teen pregnancy 16 of females ages 10-17

Baltimore City Data Collaborative, 2001
5
Consensus
  • Targeting single risk factors not likely to be as
    effective as an ecological perspective.
  • Intervention and prevention programs for this
    population must be individualized and offer
    multiple services.
  • Services must empower families, build on
    strengths, and respect cultural diversity.

6
Goals of Family Strengthening Programs
  • To increase protective factors
  • To decrease risk factors

7
Protective Factors
  • Supportive caregiver-child relationships
  • Positive discipline methods
  • Close monitoring supervision of children
  • Coping strategies by adults children
  • Social support community connections
  • Spirituality
  • Cultural roots
  • Economic stability

8
Risk Factors
  • Family conflict, chaos, stress
  • Caregiver mental physical health problems
  • Child behavioral, mental and physical health
    problems
  • Poor caregiver-child relationships
  • Social isolation
  • Poverty community violence

9
Strengthening Families in West Baltimore
10
Overview of Program
  • Family Connections, Baltimore, Maryland
  • Promotes the safety and well being of children
    and families through family and community
    services, professional education and training,
    and research and evaluation.

A program of the University of Maryland,
Baltimore Center for Families
11
Target Population
  • Screen for
  • Demographics
  • Risk Criteria
  • Motivation to change

12
Target neighborhoods
Serve children and families who live or go to
school in the following zip codes 21201,
21216, 21217, 21223, and 21230
13
Intervention
  • Social work services geared to increase
    protective factors and decrease risk factors.

14
Philosophical Principles
  • Community outreach
  • Family assessment and tailored interventions
  • Helping alliance
  • Empowerment approaches
  • Strengths perspective
  • Cultural competence
  • Outcome driven service plans

15
Intervention Services
  • Crisis intervention
  • Emergency assistance
  • Individualized outcome based services
  • Individual and family counseling
  • Strengthening multi-ethnic families and
    communities parent groups
  • Child therapeutic activity groups
  • Client advocacy
  • Service coordination and management

16
Preliminary selected findings
  • Based on 154 families with 473 children who have
    completed the program and research interviews at
    baseline, closing, and six-month follow-up.

17
Significant changes in
  • Caregiver well being
  • Family well being
  • Safety
  • Child well being

Most effects endure six months after services are
terminated.
18
Caregiver well being Depression
19
Caregiver well beingParenting Stress
20
Family well beingParenting Attitudes
21
Family well beingPerceptions of Neighborhoods
significant increase in satisfaction with
neighborhood (Perceived Neighborhood scale).
22
Family well beingDaily hassles
23
Family well beingFamily Conflict
Self-Report Family InventoryConflict Subscale
24
SafetyHousing conditions
without problems
25
Child well beingChild Behavior
26
To find out more about Family Connections in West
Baltimore, go to http//family.umaryland.edu
27
Selected references
  • Alvarado, R., Kumpfer, K. (2000). Strengthening
    Americas families. Juvenile Justice, VII(3),
    8-18.
  • Ashery, R.S., Robertson, E.B., Kumpfer, K.L.
    (Eds.). (1998). Drug abuse prevention through
    family interventions. Rockville, MD U.S. DHHS,
    National Institute on Drug Abuse.
  • Baltimore City Data Collaborative (2001).
    Baltimore City Neighborhood Profiles, 1997.
    Available http//www.baltimorekidsdata.org
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com