Title: War and Local Institutions in Sierra Leone
1War and Local Institutions in Sierra Leone
- John Bellows, UC Berkeley
- Edward Miguel, UC Berkeley and NBER
- April 2006
2Conflict and Economic Development
- War and conflict could be critical for
understanding cross-country economic development
patterns (Drèze 1999, World Bank 2003) - Conflict may be particularly important for
Sub-Saharan Africa, where two-thirds of countries
experienced armed conflicts in the 1980-1990s
3War and Local Institutions in Sierra Leone
- We examine local institutional, political and
social outcomes in Sierra Leone - Sierra Leone experienced a brutal civil conflict
from 1991 to 2002 - We have nationally representative survey data on
both conflict experiences and local institutions
4The Sierra Leone Civil War (1991-2002)
- Fighting started in the eastern Liberian border
but eventually affected the entire country - Collusion between rebel Revolutionary United
Front (RUF) and Sierra Leone Army (SLA) meant
that most violence was directed against civilians
5Consequences of the Sierra Leone war
- RUF attackers massacred chiefs and elders,
destroyed public buildings, displaced civilians - Recruits often attacked their home villages
- Civilian Defense Forces (CDF) were locally
organized and financed militias that successfully
fought off the RUF/SLA in some areas
6This talk
- (1) We use chiefdom level data (N152) on local
conflict-related violence, attacks and battles to
estimate localized impacts of the conflict - (2) Sierra Leone is currently undergoing
extensive local institutional reform. I will
discuss the resilience of existing local
institutions (chiefdoms) in the face of these
changes
7Empirical approach in main analysis
- Investigate association of conflict with postwar
socioeconomic outcomes, and with local
institutional and social outcomes (village
meetings, voter registration, community groups,
religiosity) in 2004-5 - We condition on geographic controls, location of
diamond mines, district fixed effects, prewar
socioeconomic characteristics
8Empirical approach in main analysis
- Investigate association of conflict with postwar
socioeconomic outcomes, and with local
institutional and social outcomes (village
meetings, voter registration, community groups,
religiosity) in 2004-5 - We condition on geographic controls, location of
diamond mines, district fixed effects, prewar
socioeconomic characteristics - Caveat 1 the location of violence is not random
- Caveat 2 nation-wide effects of the war cannot
be estimated using this identification strategy
9(No Transcript)
10Where was the fighting in Sierra Leone?
- Local diamond mines, higher prewar incomes are
both positively associated with local attacks and
battles (Table 2), greed as a driving factor - Prewar 1989 school enrollment (5-18 year olds) is
negatively correlated with conflict victimization - Organization of CDFs better there?
11Conflict intensity and local institutions
- Conflict victimization is positively associated
with several measures of postwar political
mobilization including attendance at community
meetings, voter registration, community group
membership - But there is no significant relationship between
either conflict measure and postwar 2004
socioeconomic outcomes (per capita consumption,
schooling, child nutrition)
12(No Transcript)
13(No Transcript)
14Discussion
- We find no adverse effects of civil war violence
in Sierra Leone on local living standards or
institutions - Institutions, norms, and organizations forged
during war persist into the postwar period - The rise of Community Defense Forces may be part
of a broader trend picked up in our data
15Discussion (2)
- More speculatively did the Sierra Leone civil
war generate new and possibly stronger
institutions? - Keen (2005) claims the war increased political
awareness and mobilization, especially for youths - Ferme (2001, p. 228) Sierra Leoneans have
sometimes turned social instability into a
creative, though violent, opportunity to
refashion themselves vis-Ã -vis their own
institutions
16Competing local institutions in Sierra Leone
- We document increased popular mobilization
postwar, and there is continued CDF influence - The Local Councils were revived in 2004, after a
30 year gap. But Chiefs remain dominant in rural
areas - 44 of male youths work on the chiefs farm
- 81 can name the Chief, 48 a Local Councilor
17Competing local institutions in Sierra Leone
- We document increased popular mobilization
postwar, and there is continued CDF influence - The Local Councils were revived in 2004, after a
30 year gap. But Chiefs remain dominant in rural
areas - 44 of male youths work on the chiefs farm
- 81 can name the Chief, 48 a Local Councilor
- Community driven development (CDD) interventions
- We are conducting a randomized evaluation of a
government CDD project across 240 villages
18Existing research
- Recent studies have not found persistent local
effects of war damage on population (Davis and
Weinstein 2002, Brakman et al. 2004) or economic
performance (Miguel and Roland 2005) - But existing empirical work does not study the
impact of war on institutions the theoretical
channel most likely to have persistent economic
growth effects (e.g., by shifting the aggregate
production function scale parameter, A)
19Causes of the war
- Diamond smuggling financed group leaders and arms
purchases, and armed groups often fought over
control of the mines - Deep underlying grievances against the state also
fed the violence Sierra Leone was second to
last in the 1990 UN Human Development Index
20(No Transcript)
21(No Transcript)
22(No Transcript)
23Data sources
- 2005 Institutional Reform and Capacity Building
Project (IRCBP) Survey - 2005 No Peace Without Justice (NPWJ) Report
- 2004 Integrated Household Survey (SLIHS)
- 1989 Household Survey (SLHS)
- Geographic, transport, mining controls
24(No Transcript)
25(No Transcript)
26(No Transcript)
27(No Transcript)
28(No Transcript)
29(No Transcript)
30(No Transcript)
31Remaining identification issues
- Selection could migration of low types out of
conflict areas, or lower mortality of educated
people in conflict areas explain our (positive)
results?
32Remaining identification issues
- Selection could migration of low types out of
conflict areas, or lower mortality of educated
people in conflict areas explain our (positive)
results? - Results are robust to controlling for average
chiefdom education postwar (2004), but we cannot
completely rule out unobserved variables
correlated with migration - Future work will use detailed data from the 2004
SL Census to map migration patterns from
1990-2004 - Others?