James P' Malley, Jr', Ph'D' - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

James P' Malley, Jr', Ph'D'

Description:

4. Project Background. Norfolk is supplied by groundwater pumped from ... Table 4. Water Quality and UV System Sensor Readings for Norfolk, MA Validation Test. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:115
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: gatew267
Category:
Tags: james | malley | norfolk

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: James P' Malley, Jr', Ph'D'


1
Case Study Small Groundwater System for Norfolk,
MA
  • James P. Malley, Jr., Ph.D.
  • Professor of Civil/Environmental Engineering
  • Founding and Past President International
    Ultraviolet Association
  • University of New Hampshire (UNH)
  • Environmental Research Group (ERG)
  • Room 344 Gregg Hall, 35 Colovos Road
  • Durham, NH 03824-3591(603) 862-1449
  • E-Mail jim.malley_at_unh.edu
  • VISIT www.iuva.org

UNH
Electrotechnologies Research Program
2
Acknowledgements
  • Owner Town of Norfolk, MA
  • James A. Martin, III Water Superintendent
  • Design Engineer Rich Protazowicki
  • Design Firm Dufresne-Henry, Westford, MA
  • UV Equipment Wedeco-Ideal Horizons
  • UNH Graduate Students Nicola Ballester, Craig
    Douglas and David Gaithuma
  • Thanks to WQA for the invitation to present

3
Project Background
  • The Town of Norfolk is a semi-rural suburban
    community located on an upper valley of the
    Charles River aqbout 20 miles Southwest of
    Boston, MA. Norfolk has about 10,460 residents in
    2,818 households.

4
Project Background
  • Norfolk is supplied by groundwater pumped from
    two wells. The Gold Street Well and the Spruce
    Road Well Both wells draw from the Charles River
    Watershed. Spruce Road is Norfolks primary
    water supply and is typically operated at 500 gpm
    with a maximum flow of 600 gpm and the total
    annual water production in 2003 was 197 million
    gallons.

5
Project Background
  • High Copper Levels in 1999-2000 prompted MADEP to
    Issue a State Administrative Consent Order
    requiring Norfolk to Optimize its Corrosion
    Control Measures.
  • Norfolk hired Dufresne-Henry to evaluate
    alternatives and recommend optimization for the
    Spruce Road Well
  • Dufresne-Henry recommended venturi aeration to
    drive off CO2 and augment the existing KOH feed
    system. Since aeration represents a break in the
    hydraulics and potential for microbial
    contamination it was also recommended that UV
    disinfection be implemented following the venturi
    system

6
Project Background
  • MADEP indicating both venturi aeration and UV
    disinfection represented innovative technologies
    required a pilot study prior to approval to
    proceed with full scale design.
  • Dufresne-Henry performed the venturi aeration
    pilot work and contracted with UNH to perform the
    UV disinfection pilot study simultaneously.

7
Pilot Testing
  • Pilot Testing was conducted at 2 to 10 gpm
  • The venturi aeration system was monitored for
    changes in pH and dissolved oxygen of the water
    as well as mechanical and operational reliability
  • The UV system was run at a delivered UV Dose of
    60 mJ/cm2 to be consistent with the other state
    approved groundwater UV disinfection system
    (Westford, MA)
  • The UV system was monitored for
  • Changes in Groundwater Quality (TAOs, UVT)
  • Sensor Window and Sleeve Fouling Rate
  • UV Lamp Sensor Response
  • Bacterial Removal
  • Mechanical and Operational Reliability
  • Delivered Dose

8
Pilot Testing Results
  • The venturi aeration system provided reliable and
    cost effective removal of CO2 raising the pH to
    neutral values while attaining dissolved oxygen
    saturation of the water.
  • The UV pilot demonstrated
  • Reliable operation, no detectable changes in the
    taste, odor and color of the water
  • Consistent and stable power and UV lamp output
  • Minimal UV sleeve and quartz window fouling rate
  • Consistently high influent UV Transmittance
    values
  • UV Effluent Bacterial Counts of 0/100 mL
    throughout

9
Norfolk, MA UV Scans Performed During Pilot
Testing
Mean UVT _at_254nm 96.8
10
Norfolk, MA UV Performance During Pilot Testing
11
Fullscale Facilities
  • Based on pilot testing results the MADEP approved
    fullscale design of venturi aeration and UV
    disinfection for Norfolks Spruce Road Well
    Facility
  • The Spruce Road Treatment Facility was Retrofit
    with Dual Pressurized Venturi Aerators and a
    Wedeco-Ideal Horizons LPHO Series B300 UV Reactor
    Rate at maximum flow of 600 gpm to deliver a dose
    of 60 mJ/cm2 at end of lamp life at a minimum
    UVT of 95

12
Fullscale Facilities
  • The Fullscale Facility upgrade also included
  • A new generator to provide backup power
  • An upgraded instrumentation and control system
  • New internal and external facility security
    systems
  • Improved facility piping and access
  • MADEP Required UV System Validation
  • Onsite Fullscale UV System Validation using
    protocols consistent with the USEPA UVDGM was
    performed by UNH using MS-2 bacteriophage virus
  • The UV System passed Validation and Has Been in
    Operation Since 2003

13
UV Reactor Validation
Table 1. QA/QC Results for Norfolk, MA
Validation Testing
Numbers shown in parentheses represent actual
plaques counted. Values calculated from MS-2
stock titer using a mass balance based on simple
dilution of 250 mL/min into 500 gpm.
14
UV Reactor Validation
Table 2. Replicate Sample Analysis to Verify
Mixing for Norfolk, MA Validation Testing
15
UV Reactor Validation
Table 3. Determination of UV Reactors Reduction
Equivalent Dose.
Computed from the linear regression equation
shown on the CB Dose Response Curve.
16
UV Reactor Validation
Collimated Beam (CB) Dose - Response Curves
17
UV Reactor Validation
Table 4. Water Quality and UV System Sensor
Readings for Norfolk, MA Validation Test.
18
Fullscale Facility Benefits
  • Norfolks New Water Treatment Facility provides
    numerous social and economic benefits
  • Provides a Safe and Reliable Water Supply
  • Provides a barrier for potential volatile organic
    contaminants (MtBE, BTEX, TCE)
  • Precludes the costs and impacts of developing and
    alternate water supply for the Town
  • Complies with present and anticipated SDWA
    Requirements
  • Reduces chemical costs and potential hazards to
    humans and environment from handling chemicals
  • Increases lifespan of water system and household
    plumbing
  • Minimizes financial burden on users

19
Cost and Financing
  • Project capital cost was about 1.00 per gallon
    per day of capacity (720,000)
  • Project operation and maintenance costs are 0.04
    per 1,000 gallons treated
  • Financing was achieved through a Zero Interest
    Loan from the State SDWA Revolving Loan Fund

20
A Real Winner
  • Norfolks New Water Treatment Facility using
    Innovative Technologies to Control Corrosion and
    Provide Disinfection received the 2003 American
    Consulting Engineers Council Massachusetts
    Chapters Engineering Excellence Platinum Award
    (second highest Engineering Project Award in
    Massachusetts)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com