Living in Groups - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

Living in Groups

Description:

Group size varies widely among species ... With species there is also seasonal variation. Common crows ... When should natural selection favour group living? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:67
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: brianh95
Category:
Tags: groups | living

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Living in Groups


1
Living in Groups
  • Lecture 8

2
Last lecture
  • Territoriality (defence of exclusive areas)
  • Not all animals defend territories
  • Some live in large groups

3
Group size varies widely among species
  • Mexican free-tailed bats
  • Summer breeding colonies of gt 20 million bats
  • Tree swallows
  • Territories
  • Male-female pair with offspring

4
With species there is also seasonal variation
  • Common crows
  • Summer small groups (territorial pairs)
  • Winter large flocks

5
When should natural selection favour group
living?
  • There are costs and benefits to living in large
    groups
  • If the benefits of group living are greater than
    the costs associated with group living then group
    living should be selected for
  • Whether these conditions are met depends on the
    biology of the species and on environmental
    conditions

6
Potential costs of living in groups
  • Increased competition for resources
  • Food
  • Nesting sites
  • Increased rate of disease transmission
  • Increased rates of parasitism

7
Potential benefits of living in groups
  • Increased ability to detect predators
  • More eyes watching
  • Increased probability of not being caught
  • Dilution effect
  • Confusion effect
  • Cooperative hunting
  • Carnivores that kill large prey
  • Increased ease of sharing information about the
    location of ephemeral resources e.g. insect
    prey
  • Information centre hypothesis

8
Colonial Behaviour - Cliff Swallows
  • Cliff swallows are ideal models for studies of
    the costs and benefits of living in groups
  • Colony size varies greatly
  • 10s to 10s of thousands of birds

9
Cliff swallows
  • Brown et al. have conducted a series of
    experiments and field studies
  • Tested the information centre hypothesis
  • As well as other costs and benefits of colony
    size

10
Cliff swallows
  • They compared feeding behaviour and nestling
    feeding rates over a range of colony sizes

11
Unsuccessful foragers
  • Follow successful foragers to feeding sites
  • Identified by watching for birds returning with
    food for nestlings
  • At large colonies
  • Successful foragers leave more regularly
  • Unsuccessful foragers have to spend less time
    waiting for a successful bird to follow

12
Translated into
  • Higher provisioning rates at large colonies
  • Parents bring back food more frequently
  • Bring back more food per trip

13
Costs of livings in large colonies
  • Increase in nest parasites

14
Trade-off between risk of nest parasites and
efficient information transfer
  • Birds from large and small colonies have approx
    equal chances of successfully fledging young
  • There is a trade-off between benefits (learning
    where food is) and costs (parasitism risk)
  • In fumigation experiments
  • Removing risk of parasites
  • Large colonies have greater success

15
Protection from predators
  • Animals must simultaneously forage and also
    remain vigilant for predators
  • In large groups each individual should be able to
    spend more time foraging if other group members
    share the task of detecting predators

16
Ring-necked Pheasants
Group Size
17
Ring-necked Pheasants
Group Size
18
Vigilance in Elk (Childress and Lung 2003, Anim.
Behav. 66389-398)
  • Risk of predation influenced by extrinsic and
    intrinsic factors

19
Intrinsic
  • Sex
  • Age
  • Nutritional status

20
Extrinsic
  • Predator density
  • Habitat
  • Group size

21
Rocky Mountain Elk
  • Yellowstone National Park
  • 1995 1996
  • Reintroduction of Wolves
  • Gradient of predator encounter rates

22
Observed herds from roadsides
  • Recorded
  • Herd size and composition
  • Activities of focal animals
  • Divided activities into categories based on
    posture
  • Feeding head below shoulders
  • Scanning head above shoulders
  • Aggression stamping
  • Resting lying down

23
Individual vigilance
  • Measured by observing focal individuals
  • Calculated time spent scanning

24
Group vigilance
  • Fixed interval timed scans
  • Calculated
  • time at least one herd member was scanning
  • Proportion of individuals scanning during a
    sample scan

25
Scan duration (sec) under different encounter
risks
26
Vigilance varies
  • According age-sex class

27
Vigilance varies
  • Males and females respond differently to
    variation on predation risk
  • Females with young
  • Detecting predators may be more important
  • Males with depleted energy reserves
  • Foraging may be more important

28
Group size
  • They also found a group size effect
  • But the type of effect varied with age and gender
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com