Title: Living in Groups
1Living in Groups
2Last lecture
- Territoriality (defence of exclusive areas)
- Not all animals defend territories
- Some live in large groups
3Group size varies widely among species
- Mexican free-tailed bats
- Summer breeding colonies of gt 20 million bats
- Tree swallows
- Territories
- Male-female pair with offspring
4With species there is also seasonal variation
- Common crows
- Summer small groups (territorial pairs)
- Winter large flocks
5When should natural selection favour group
living?
- There are costs and benefits to living in large
groups - If the benefits of group living are greater than
the costs associated with group living then group
living should be selected for - Whether these conditions are met depends on the
biology of the species and on environmental
conditions
6Potential costs of living in groups
- Increased competition for resources
- Food
- Nesting sites
- Increased rate of disease transmission
- Increased rates of parasitism
-
7Potential benefits of living in groups
- Increased ability to detect predators
- More eyes watching
- Increased probability of not being caught
- Dilution effect
- Confusion effect
- Cooperative hunting
- Carnivores that kill large prey
- Increased ease of sharing information about the
location of ephemeral resources e.g. insect
prey - Information centre hypothesis
-
8Colonial Behaviour - Cliff Swallows
- Cliff swallows are ideal models for studies of
the costs and benefits of living in groups - Colony size varies greatly
- 10s to 10s of thousands of birds
9Cliff swallows
- Brown et al. have conducted a series of
experiments and field studies - Tested the information centre hypothesis
- As well as other costs and benefits of colony
size
10Cliff swallows
- They compared feeding behaviour and nestling
feeding rates over a range of colony sizes
11Unsuccessful foragers
- Follow successful foragers to feeding sites
- Identified by watching for birds returning with
food for nestlings - At large colonies
- Successful foragers leave more regularly
- Unsuccessful foragers have to spend less time
waiting for a successful bird to follow
12Translated into
- Higher provisioning rates at large colonies
- Parents bring back food more frequently
- Bring back more food per trip
13Costs of livings in large colonies
- Increase in nest parasites
14Trade-off between risk of nest parasites and
efficient information transfer
- Birds from large and small colonies have approx
equal chances of successfully fledging young - There is a trade-off between benefits (learning
where food is) and costs (parasitism risk) - In fumigation experiments
- Removing risk of parasites
- Large colonies have greater success
15Protection from predators
- Animals must simultaneously forage and also
remain vigilant for predators - In large groups each individual should be able to
spend more time foraging if other group members
share the task of detecting predators
16Ring-necked Pheasants
Group Size
17Ring-necked Pheasants
Group Size
18Vigilance in Elk (Childress and Lung 2003, Anim.
Behav. 66389-398)
- Risk of predation influenced by extrinsic and
intrinsic factors
19Intrinsic
- Sex
- Age
- Nutritional status
20Extrinsic
- Predator density
- Habitat
- Group size
21Rocky Mountain Elk
- Yellowstone National Park
- 1995 1996
- Reintroduction of Wolves
- Gradient of predator encounter rates
22Observed herds from roadsides
- Recorded
- Herd size and composition
- Activities of focal animals
- Divided activities into categories based on
posture - Feeding head below shoulders
- Scanning head above shoulders
- Aggression stamping
- Resting lying down
23Individual vigilance
- Measured by observing focal individuals
- Calculated time spent scanning
24Group vigilance
- Fixed interval timed scans
- Calculated
- time at least one herd member was scanning
- Proportion of individuals scanning during a
sample scan
25Scan duration (sec) under different encounter
risks
26Vigilance varies
27Vigilance varies
- Males and females respond differently to
variation on predation risk - Females with young
- Detecting predators may be more important
- Males with depleted energy reserves
- Foraging may be more important
28Group size
- They also found a group size effect
- But the type of effect varied with age and gender