ES 1111 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

ES 1111

Description:

Weather observations are incorporated into the model, and new forecasts are ... Weather forecasts produced by these models have a reasonable accuracy out to ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:61
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: karlsc
Category:
Tags: weather

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ES 1111


1
ES 1111
  • Future Climates and the Consequences
  • Chapters 9, 10, and 5

2
Determining Future Climates
  • We attempt to foresee and predict future climates
    by using climate models
  • Climate models are computer programs that use all
    the equations governing the weather and climate
  • By inserting changes, like the amount of carbon
    dioxide in the atmosphere, we can see what the
    response in our climate will be (according to the
    model)
  • Trying to create a model which accurately
    reflects the complexity of Earths climate is an
    immense challenge

3
Global Circulation Models
  • Weather forecasting uses these models to predict
    short-term weather
  • Weather observations are incorporated into the
    model, and new forecasts are generated every
    12-24 hours
  • Over 20 trillion calculations are required
  • The atmosphere is divided up into grids
    (horizontally and vertically), the amount to
    which depends on the model being used
  • Weather forecasts produced by these models have a
    reasonable accuracy out to about 6 days

4
General Circulation Models
  • Climate modelers use these GCMs to predict future
    climate
  • Because of the length of time of the forecast
    period, the amount of calculations required are
    astronomical
  • Because of this, the GCMs use a lower spatial and
    temporal resolution than models used for weather
    forecasting
  • At best, the resolution is 2.5 degrees in
    latitude by 3.75 degrees of longitude, with 20
    vertical levels
  • Therefore, the same detail is not possible

5
Atmospheric-Ocean Interactions
  • Models for predicting weather treat the sea
    surface temperatures as a constant
  • Climate models must include realistic
    representations of the oceans
  • Currents and eddies are small features that play
    a big role in climate, but they are too small for
    our climate models grid
  • Fluxes of heat between the ocean and atmosphere
    depend on such currents

6
Performance of GCMs
  • There is about a 6 C scatter in temperature
    between different models
  • Models have more difficulty in higher latitudes
    and over land
  • Similar scatter results in precipitation
    forecasts
  • Sea-level pressure is handled well
  • Snow and ice cover is a problem
  • Clouds are critical due to their potential to act
    as a positive or negative feedback to climate
    change, yet these models can not generate most
    clouds on their own (parameterization of the
    clouds must be done correctly)
  • Models underestimate the clouds in low to
    mid-latitudes, and overestimate clouds in high
    latitudes

7
Other Difficulties
  • GCMs have problems producing natural climate
    variability (only about 20-60 of the
    fluctuations are forecast)
  • Some success has been observed in predicting
    consequences of specific perturbations (volcanic
    eruptions)
  • Running the models to see how they simulate past
    climate is difficult because of our limitations
    in knowledge of that time

8
Improving GCMs
  • Improving GCMs will require
  • Bigger and faster computers
  • Better physical representations of processes
  • Clouds
  • How much sunlight is absorbed/reflected from each
    type
  • Spatial and temporal resolution must be better
  • Precipitation processes must be better handled
  • Moving away from parameterization
  • Land-Surface Processes
  • Changes in albedo (desertification, vegetation)
  • Soil moisture variations
  • Snow cover handled better
  • Winds, Waves, and Currents
  • Better heat, momentum, and moisture flux
    performance
  • ENSO processes
  • Ocean conveyor
  • Changes in Greenhouse Gases and Ozone

9
Predicting Climate Change
  • Our present climate has been fairly stable
  • There is an estimate that, based on orbital
    factors, we will be headed into another ice age
    in about 23,000 years
  • There is no way of knowing whether the climate
    will remain stable or flip into a new state
    accompanied by a radical change in climate
  • With human activities predicted to have a big
    impact in the future, the chance of climate
    becoming more unstable will increase
  • Whether natural climate variability or man-made
    change causes a climate shift is speculative

10
The Climate Forecast
  • From GCMs, a doubling of carbon dioxide will
    result in an increase in mean global temperatures
    of between 1.5 and 4.5 C, with the best estimate
    of 2.5 C
  • This change will happen by the year 2100
  • Tropics are more stable than the high latitudes
  • In spite of their uncertainties, the GCMs produce
    a world that resembles our current climate, and
    their behavior of increasing temperatures that
    mirror what happened lends them credibility
  • Sea level change, due to mountain glaciers
    melting and thermal expansion, 27 cm higher
    (range from 17 to 49 cm) by 2100
  • Further changes in sea level due to the Antarctic
    ice sheets melting could rise sea levels 60-120
    cm, but some models suggest increased snowfall
    and a growing ice sheet

11
Consequences of Global Warming
  • Weather patterns may change on a regional scale
  • Weather may become more extreme (more hurricanes,
    ENSO, lows weaker)
  • Shifting of agricultural zones, famine, drought
  • Migration and extinction of plants and animals
  • Rising sea levels
  • Rising sea levels yielding tectonic changes
  • Changes in ocean circulation leaving Europe
    colder than it currently is
  • Isostatic rebound of Scandinavia after retreat of
    ice sheets (10 mm per year of lifting)
  • Spread of diseases and global pandemics
  • Economic cost due to frequent extreme weather

12
Isostatic Rebound
  • Figure 5.5, Page 126
  • Figure showing the rebound of Scandinavia

13
Consequences for Illinois
  • According to the National Assessment Synthesis
    Team of the US Global Change Research Program
  • 3-6 C increase in mean annual temperature by
    2100
  • Decrease of up to 50 in length of snow cover
  • Increased precipitation (20-40) by 2100 due to
    greater rainfall events (more rain per storm)
  • Increased evaporation would decrease lake levels
    (Lake Michigan by 4-5 feet)
  • Longer growing season, increased agricultural
    yields
  • Loss of boreal forests to more deciduous forests
  • Loss of wetlands and associated birds and fish
  • Increased number of invasive species (zebra
    mussels)
  • Increased heavy precipitation events yielding
    increased water-borne disease outbreaks
    (cryptosporidiosis, encephalitis)

14
Illinois Summer Climate Shifts
  • Figure from the National Assessment Synthesis
    Team of the US Global Change Research Programs
    book showing how Illinois summer climate will
    shift according to two climate models. One model
    suggests a summer climate more like the Carolinas
    by 2090, and another puts our summer climate more
    like eastern Oklahoma.

15
When Will We Know?
  • When will we know if the observed warming is due
    to natural factors or man?
  • The warmest year since 1860 was 1997
  • The five warmest years have all been in the 1990s
  • ENSO muddies the picture
  • Confidence in GCMs will fall if the observed
    warming abruptly stops
  • Linkage between economic growth and carbon
    dioxide emissions make reductions unpopular

16
Update!
  • According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
    Administration and the World Meteorological
    Organization
  • 2005 will be the warmest year (0.75 degrees
    Celsius above the 1950-1980 average)
  • 1998 was 0.71 degrees C above
  • 9 of the 10 hottest years on record since 1861
    occurred in 1995 or later (not counting 2005),
    with the last four years (2001-2004) being among
    the five hottest.

17
Gaia Hypothesis
  • James Lovelock came up with this hypothesis
  • Life and the global environment are two parts of
    a single system
  • Natural selection drives adjustments in the
    biosphere that the Earths environment remains in
    a state optimum for life
  • Phytoplankton (algae) produce dimethylsuphide
    (DMS). DMS converts into sulfate particles which
    are CCN. Therefore, warming of the sea would
    result in more algae, which would emit more
    sulfate particles, yielding more clouds, and
    serve as a negative feedback to the warming
    (climate thermostat)
  • It is controversial, yet life and a narrow
    temperature range has been maintained despite
    changes in solar output (30 more), continents
    moving around, etc.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com