Title: Cognitive Aspects of Personality
1Cognitive Aspects of Personality
- Theories of Personality
- Prepared by Jim Messina, Ph.D.
2Cognitive Theorists
- Emphasis on cognitive structures or concepts,
perceptual processes employed-attend, comprehend,
conceptualize. Human perception and cognition is
core of personality - Kurt Lewin
- Jean Piaget
- George Kelly 1905-1967
- Julian Rotter 1916-
- Albert Bandera 1925-
3Gestalt Psychology
- Human beings seek meaning in environment
- We organize our sensations from environment into
meaningful perceptions - Complex stimuli are not reducible to their sum of
their parts - Configuration of a complex stimuli is its essence
4Field Theory-Kurt Lewin-1935
- Life Space-Internal external forces that act on
an individual-and structural relationships
between the person environment-determined by
Boundaries between each life space - Contemporaneous Causation-momentary condition in
the individuals mind at the time at any moment
5Field Dependence as Personality Variable
- Field Dependent Very influenced in problem
solving by salient but irrelevant aspects of the
context (or field) in which the problem
occurs-influence by externalized aspects of
problem solving-Field Independent more
analytical-complex restructuring in problem
solving-influenced by internalize aspects of
problem solving
6Field Independent Persons
7Cognitive Style
- Cognitive approach or style based on demands on
individual from group raised in - Women-Field Dependent-social sensitivity
contextually bound moral reasoning - Hunter-gathers Field Independent-to find game
keep track of locations-more analytical - Farmers Field Dependent-elaborate systems of
socialization conformity to group norms
8Schemas and Scripts-Jean Piaget 1952
- Children progress thru series of cognitive stages
as they mature - Schemas new cognitive structures which build on
structures acquired earlier-when activated major
determinant of persons expectations, inferences,
actions - Script schema for a familiar event-specifies
roles, actions, props setting
9Stages of Cognitive Development - Jean Piaget
- 1. Sensorimotor Stage Birth to 2 years old - no
thinking structures - 2. Preoperational Stage 2-7 years old - develop
language skills cognitive structures prelogical - 3. Concrete Operational Stage 7 years to
Adolescence - Begins to question life. Solves
problems but haphazardly - 4. Formal Operations Stage Adolescence and
onward - capable of sophisticated logical
thought. Can think both abstract hypothetically
and solve problems using the logic of combinations
10Later Theorists have added Fifth Stage
- Dialectical Reasoning - stage beyond logic where
critical thinking lies. Ability to perceive the
frequent paradoxes in life and question and
analyze the assumptions that underlie logic. - Being able to look at two sides of an argument or
problem to get a broader, deeper, more
reasonable perspective on the issues being
addressed
11Impact of Piaget
- Understanding unfolds in logical order
- New cognitions build on older cognitions
- Good teachers do not directly teach or
reinforce-but guide learners to their own
discoveries - Distinctive view of human nature
12(No Transcript)
13Categorization
- Tendency to organize experience by assigning
events, objects people encountered into
categories-influences interpretations and
expectations - Always present and happening-Automatically
occurs-based on personal experiences - Is foundation of negative stereotypes, prejudices
(premature judgment)-more likely to attend to
information which supports expectations
14Personal Construct Theory George Kelly 1955
- Personal Construct Theory or Constructivism
People construe or understand the world and
construct own versions of reality-personal system
of explaining human behaviors - Each of us tries to understand the world and we
do so in ways that are different - A persons processes are psychologically
channeled by ways in which he anticipates events - Every man is, in his own particular way, a
scientist
15Role Construct Repertory Test
- Assessment evokes personal construct system
- Persons understanding of personality emerges
through making comparisons - Comparison of triads to get hierarchy of
constructs used for understanding and predicting
behavior
16Social Intelligence
- Level of mastery of the particular cluster of
knowledge and skills relevant to interpersonal
situations - People vary in their abilities to understand and
influence other people
17Multiple Intelligences-Howard Gardners concept
- Seven different intelligences-ways of knowing the
world through - Language
- Logical-mathematical analysis
- Spatial representations
- Musical Thinking
- Bodily Kinesthetic intelligence (body)
- Understanding of self
- Understanding others
18Explanatory Style
- Set of variables that captures a persons
habitual means of interpreting events in life - Optimism focus on positive potential vs
Pessimism focus on negative potential
19Learned Helplessness-Martin Seligman 1975
- Situation in which repeated exposure to
unavoidable punishment leads organism to accept
later punishment even when it is avoidable-Learn
they are helpless so give up trying to escape or
avoid it - Depression-depressive schema-generate more and
more depressive thoughts
20Julian Rotter 1972
- Took into account people work to attain goals
both because of the consequences (rewards)
thoughts and perceptions about outcomes and its
likelihood - Outcome expectancy positive result
- Reinforcement value how much we value the
expected reinforcement
21Behavior Potential
- Likelihood that a particular behavior will occur
in a specific situation - Specific expectancy-follow a behavior in a
particular situation - Generalized expectancy-related to group
situations - Use more generalized expectancies in new
situations and use specific when situations
become familiar
22Rotters Psychological Needs arising out of
Biological Needs
- Recognition status (need to achieve, seen as
competent, positive social standing) - Dominance (need to control, have power
influence) - Independence (need to make decisions for oneself)
- Protection-dependency (need to have others give
one security and help one achieve goals) - Love Affection (need to be liked cared for)
- Physical comfort (need to avoid pain, seek
pleasure, enjoy physical security well being
23Rotters Psychological Situation
- Behavior potential, outcome expectancy
reinforcement potential - Power of situation in behavior
- What is important is individuals unique
combination of potential behaviors and value to
person - Persons expectations values interact with
situational constraints which exert influence on
behavior
24Internal vs External Locus of Control Rotters
- Internal locus of control generalized expectancy
that individuals actions will lead to desired
outcome-achievement oriented and high achievers - External locus of control belief that things
outside of individual determine whether a desired
outcome will occur based on-less independent,
depressed, stressed-hand over control to - Powerful others
- Luck or Chance
25Albert Bandura Self-System
- Set of cognitive processes by which a person
perceives, evaluates, and regulates personal
behavior so that it is appropriate to the
environment and effective in achieving the
individuals goals. - Observational learning inner person demands
of situation combine to determine behaviors
26Social Learning Theory Albert Bandura
- Allows for the cognitive process to mediate
between environment and behavior - Bandura believed that people cognitively
represent the behavior of others and then
sometimes adopt this behavior themselves - His model shows a reciprocal influence of
behavior, personal and cognitive factors, and
environment
27Banduras Model of Reciprocal Influence
- B Behavior
- P(C) Personal Cognitive Factors (such as
intelligence, skills self-control) - E Environment
- The arrows reflect how relations between these
factors are reciprocal rather than
unidirectional.
28(No Transcript)
29(No Transcript)
30(No Transcript)
31Observational Learning
- How new behaviors are acquired in absence of
reinforcement - Observational learning-vicarious learning- gained
second hand by watching the experience of another - Modeling person forms self in image of another
32Outcome Expectancy
- Expected consequence of the behavior is most
significant influence on whether an observer will
reproduce an observed behavior - Individuals are more likely to imitate behavior
that they believe leads to positive outcomes. - Outcome expectancy is based on both consequences
of rewards and punishments and on anticipated
consequences
33Four Components of Observational Learning
- Attention influenced by characteristics of the
model situation - Retention influenced by cognitive ability of
observer and ability to encode the
behavior-images or verbal representation - Motor reproduction turn mental representation
into physical action-mentally rehearse the
behavior - Motivation most influences actual performance of
the behavior which has been observed-valued vs
negative outcomes
34Self-Regulation
- Individuals internal processes of goals,
planning, self-reinforcement result in
self-regulation of behavior - Self-punishment feelings of self-disgust, shame
or withhold desired object - Internal standards used to measure own success or
failure-gained by both observation and past
behavior acting
35Self-Efficacy
- An expectancy or belief (expectation) about how
competently one will be able to enact a behavior
in a particular situation - Positive belief will be able to perform
- Determines if we try, how long we persist, how
results influence future behavior
36Self-Efficacy results from four types of
information
- Our experiences trying to perform the behavior
(failure or success) - Watching others perform same or similar behavior
(vicarious) - Verbal persuasion (encouragement)
- How we feel about the behavior (emotional
reactions)
37Resilience
- Ability to absorb failure and disappointment and
still believe in oneself - Take the hard knocks and survive to be justified
by success in ones life - Stuff that overcomes adversity
- Bolstering ones self-efficacy against all types
of challenges to succeed in the end
38Turing Test by Alan Turing
- A test to see if computer programs can adequately
simulate a human well enough to fool a human
judge - Shows it is dangerous to apply to computers
characteristics of humans and vice versa!