Queens University Kingston, Canada - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 36
About This Presentation
Title:

Queens University Kingston, Canada

Description:

More practical application/ real world issues = 38% Excellent communication skills = 21 ... Practical work experience requirement (ex: coop program) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:69
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 37
Provided by: mechanical3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Queens University Kingston, Canada


1
  • Queens University - Kingston, Canada
  • Department of Mechanical and Materials
    Engineering
  • Alumni/-ae Survey
  • September, 2004

2
Alumni/-ae Survey - Queens Kingston
  • Outline
  • Goals of the survey
  • The template used in the alumni/-ae survey
  • Who was surveyed?
  • Selected results
  • Discussion of results
  • CEAB
  • Conclusion

3
Alumni/-ae Survey - Queens Kingston
  • Goals of the Survey
  • To help in the modification of the Mechanical and
    Materials Engineering curriculum to ensure that
    it leads to the levels of proficiency for
    graduating engineers required by industry.
  • To assist in the review of the curriculum in Fall
    2004
  • To assist in developing the CEAB submission in
    2005
  • To act as a Benchmark for future surveys
  • To assist in Benchmarking for the Mechanical and
    Materials Engineering program with those of other
    universities worldwide

4
Alumni/-ae Survey - Queens Kingston
  • The Survey
  • The template used in the survey was developed
    from the Alumni/-ae Survey undertaken by QUB
  • The survey consisted of questions regarding the
    following
  • The name, year of graduation from
    Queens-Kingston, and occupation of the
    respondent
  • 1.0 Mathematics
  • 2.0 Mechanical and Materials Engineering Sciences
  • 3.0 Additional Core Subjects
  • 4.0 Personal and Professional Skills and
    Attributes
  • 5.0 Operating Systems in the Enterprise and
    Societal Context
  • 6.0 Allocation of Teaching Time
  • NOTE The survey covers only of the core
    curriculum, not the technical electives.

5
Alumni/-ae Survey - Queens Kingston
  • Five Levels of Proficiency
  • Concluded that the levels had to deviate from
    CDIO Survey due to difficult wording
  • Felt that a clear rank system was more efficient
    and simpler
  • Tested CDIO Survey with 15 faculty members, 30
    graduate students, and 8 undergraduate students
    to obtain their opinion of the survey before
    sending it out to alumni/-ae
  • The survey is similar to that used by QUB

6
Alumni/-ae Survey - Queens Kingston
  • Who was surveyed?
  • 3028 Mechanical and Materials Engineering
    graduates from 1970-2004
  • 402 responses 13.3
  • 10.3 female graduates, 89.7 male graduates
  • 17.3 female graduate responded, 12.7 male
    graduates responded
  • Older versus Younger Alumni/-ae
  • Occupation of Alumni/-ae
  • Other involved positions in finance, sales,
    teaching, etc.

7
Selected Results- Queens Kingston
8
Selected Results- Queens Kingston
9
Selected Results- Queens Kingston
  • Comparison of MIT, QUB, and QUK
  • The results of MIT, QUB and QUK were compared
    using a two- tailed T-test
  • By conventional criteria, the differences between
    the three sets of survey results cannot be
    considered to be statistically significant.

10
4.0 Personal and Professional Skills and
Attributes - Queens Kingston
11
5.0 Operating System in the Enterprise and
Societal Context - Queens Kingston
12
1.0 Mathematics - Queens Kingston
13
2.0 Mechanical and Materials Engineering Sciences
- Queens Kingston
  • Thermodynamics, Fluid Mechanics, Statics Solid
    Mechanics,Engineering Dynamics Kinematics
  • Asked graduates for each core course listed above
    In this
  • matter, how important is it that a graduating
    engineer should
  • 2.X.1 Be familiar with basic principles and
    relationships
  • 2.X.2 Be able to derive mathematical equations
    and relationships
  • 2.X.3 Be able to apply engineering knowledge to
    real world issues

14
3.0 Additional Material - Queens Kingston
15
6.0 Allocation of Teaching Time
Queens Kingston
16
Alumni/-ae Survey - Queens Kingston
  • Comments from Alumni/-ae
  • From their work experience, many alumni/-ae felt
    that the following should be emphasized in the
    curriculum in order to better prepare our
    graduates for positions in industry
  • More practical application/ real world issues
    38
  • Excellent communication skills 21
  • More group projects/ teamwork 27
  • Other comments 14

17
Alumni/-ae Survey - Queens Kingston
  • Suggestions to Improve the Quality of a
    Graduating Engineer Student
  • Practical work experience requirement (ex coop
    program)
  • Make the undergraduate degree 4.5 - 5 years
    instead of 4 to put more emphasis and time on a
    full design project / thesis
  • A more holistic approach and understanding of the
    business world (example 6-sigma )
  • A good grasp of project management
  • To learn and be aware of environmental impacts
    and issues
  • Up to date with latest technologies

18
Alumni/-ae Survey - Queens Kingston
  • Summary
  • Expected level of proficiency similar to QUB
  • Little difference between younger and older
    graduates
  • More real world, multidisciplinary project based
    work with a strong communication and teamwork
    component

19
Alumni/-ae Survey - Queens Kingston
  • Canadian Engineering Accreditation Board (CEAB)
  • The usual route to becoming a Professional
    Engineer in Canada is to complete an accredited
    program at university, work as an engineer under
    the supervision of a Professional Engineer for
    four years and pass a Professional Practice
    Examination. CEAB is the body that has the
    responsibility for accrediting university
    programs in Canada. Although licensing of
    Professional Engineers is a provincial
    responsibility, CEAB is a national body formed by
    the provincial professional engineering bodies.
  • University engineering programs must normally be
    reaccredited every six years.

20
Alumni/-ae Survey - Queens Kingston
  • Canadian Engineering Accreditation Board (CEAB)
  • CEAB was established to accredit undergraduate
    engineering programs that will provide aspiring
    engineers with the academic requirements
    necessary for registration as a professional
    engineer in Canada
  • CEAB also assesses the equivalency of the
    accreditation systems used in other nations to
    the Canadian system
  • CEAB works closely with Canadian universities to
    ensure that graduates of accredited engineering
    programs have the skills they need to become
    productive members of the profession.

21
Alumni/-ae Survey - Queens Kingston
  • Canadian Engineering Accreditation Board (CEAB)
  • Beside looking at the quality of a program and of
    the professors delivering the program, CEAB looks
    at the workload in the program.
  • Workload is in terms of Academic Units (AU), this
    being such that 3 X 1.0 hour lectures with 1.0
    tutorial per week for one term 42 Academic
    Unit.
  • Engineering programs in Canada involve four
    years, i.e. eight terms, of study. The equivalent
    of approximately six 42 AU courses are taken per
    term.
  •   

22
Alumni/-ae Survey - Queens Kingston
  • Canadian Engineering Accreditation Board (CEAB)
  • CEAB looks at the distribution of the material in
    a program between Mathematics, Basic Sciences,
    Complementary Studies Languages, Engineering
    Science and Engineering Design.
  • The QUK mechanical and materials engineering
    curriculum consists of the following distribution
    of academic units
  •   

23
Alumni/-ae Survey - Queens Kingston
  • The Near Future
  • The following are underway or will be started in
    the very near future
  • A benchmarking of our present program against the
    CDIO standards.
  • A survey of our incoming (2nd year) students.
  • An evaluation of our program in light of the
    results of the alumni/-ae survey.
  • Preparation for CEAB reaccreditation process in
    2005.

24
Alumni/-ae Survey - Queens Kingston
  • Conclusions
  • Summarizing the input of the alumni/-ae
  • A prime goal of an engineering education should
    be to teach students how to think logically,
    creatively and critically.
  • Problem solving/analysis is an important feature
    of engineering, but it must be complemented by
    having a global perspective and the ability to
    communicate ideas in an effective manner in order
    to be successful.
  • Current schooling doesnt allow students
    sufficient experience with full cycle projects to
    learn from trial and error. We put a lot of
    emphasis on C-D, but due to time limitation,
    there is not enough I-O.

25
Alumni/-ae Survey - Queens Kingston
26
Alumni/-ae Survey - Queens Kingston
27
Alumni/-ae Survey - Queens Kingston
28
Alumni/-ae Survey - Queens Kingston
29
Alumni/-ae Survey - Queens Kingston
30
Alumni/-ae Survey - Queens Kingston
31
Alumni/-ae Survey - Queens Kingston
32
Alumni/-ae Survey - Queens Kingston
33
Alumni/-ae Survey - Queens Kingston
34
Alumni/-ae Survey - Queens Kingston
35
Alumni/-ae Survey - Queens Kingston
Some of our students do, at times, seem to be
from another world.
36
Alumni/-ae Survey - Queens Kingston
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com