Cognitive Processes PSY 334 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 9
About This Presentation
Title:

Cognitive Processes PSY 334

Description:

Slamecka & Graf compared generation of synonyms and rhymes. Both improved memory, but synonyms did more. Incidental Learning ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:136
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 10
Provided by: NAlva6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Cognitive Processes PSY 334


1
Cognitive ProcessesPSY 334
  • Chapter 6 Human Memory Encoding and Storage

2
Factors Influencing Memory
  • Study alone does not improve memory what
    matters is how studying is done.
  • Shallow study results in little improvement.
  • Semantic associates (tulip-flower) better
    remembered than rhymes (tower-flower), 81 vs
    70.
  • Better retention occurs for more meaningful
    elaboration.

3
Elaborative Processing
  • Elaboration embellishing an item with
    additional information.
  • Anderson Bower subjects added details to
    simple sentences
  • 57 recall without elaboration
  • 72 recall with made-up details added
  • Self-generated elaborations are better than
    experimenter-generated ones.

4
Self-Generated Elaborations
  • Stein Bransford subjects were given 10
    sentences. Four conditions
  • Just the sentences alone 4.2 adjectives
  • Subject generates an elaboration 5.8
  • Experimenter-generated imprecise elaboration
    2.2
  • Experimenter-generated precise elaboration 7.8
  • Precision of detail (constraint) matters, not who
    generates the elaboration.

5
Advance Organizers
  • PQ4R method use questions to guide reading.
  • 64 correct, compared to 57 (controls)
  • 76 of relevant questions correct, 52 of
    non-relevant.
  • These study techniques work because they
    encourage elaboration.
  • Question making and question answering both
    improve memory for text (reviewing is better than
    seeing the questions first).

6
Meaningful Elaboration
  • Elaboration need not be meaningful other sorts
    of elaboration also work.
  • Kolers compared memory for right-side-up
    sentences with upside-down.
  • Extra processing needed to read upside down may
    enhance memory.
  • Slamecka Graf compared generation of synonyms
    and rhymes. Both improved memory, but synonyms
    did more.

7
Incidental Learning
  • It does not matter whether people intend to learn
    something or not.
  • What matters is how material is processed.
  • Orienting tasks
  • Count whether work has e or g.
  • Rate the pleasantness of words.
  • Half of subjects told they would be asked to
    remember words later, half not told.
  • No advantage to knowing ahead of time.

8
Flashbulb Memories
  • Self-reference effect -- people have better
    memory for events that are important to them and
    close friends.
  • Flashbulb memories recall of traumatic events
    long after the fact.
  • Seem vivid but can be very inaccurate.
  • Thatchers resignation
  • 60 memory for UK subjects, 20 non-UK

9
Neural Correlates of Encoding
  • Better memory occurs for items with stronger
    brain processing at the time of study
  • Words evoking higher ERP signals are better
    remembered later.
  • Greater frontal activation with deeper processing
    of verbal information.
  • Greater activation of hippocampus with better
    long-term memory.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com