Getting Ready for the Post Award Review - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Getting Ready for the Post Award Review

Description:

Draft Report 30 days after commencement. Final Report to Requiring Activity. Action Pending ... If Assertion is Made, the Post Award Review Will Commence ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:70
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: rca09
Category:
Tags: award | getting | post | ready | review

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Getting Ready for the Post Award Review


1
Getting Ready for the Post Award Review
  • Presentation to DLA A-76 Conference
  • October 26, 2005
  • Williamsburg, VA

2
The New A-76
  • New OMB Circular Neither Requires Nor Prohibits
    Post Award Review
  • DLA Has Determined It Will Retain Post-Award
    Performance Reviews
  • The Nature and Approach of These Reviews Will
    Change

3
Key Distinction
  • Post MEO Review
  • Only Review Performance if Government Win
  • Post Award Performance Review
  • Review Performance of All Winners
  • Assures Accountability

4
Post Award Performance Review
  • Performance Accountability Emphasized in New
    Circular
  • Type of Monitoring Not Specified
  • Good Management Practice/Decisions
  • Help Withstand Audits, Reviews, Inquiries
  • Audit-Like Independence Required

5
Post Performance Review
  • Government MEO
  • Workload
  • Adjustments (Mods/Deviations)
  • Cost (Budget Execution)
  • Performance
  • Commercial Contractor
  • Workload
  • Adjustments (Contract Modifications)
  • Cost (Invoices)
  • Performance

6
Post Performance Review
  • Mandatory after 1 year full performance
  • Commence 15-18 months after transition.
  • Optional thereafter
  • Products Draft and Final Management Reports
    w/Recommendations
  • Draft Report 30 days after commencement
  • Final Report to Requiring Activity

7
Action Pending
  • Post Performance Accountability Review Handbook

8
Review Objectives
  • Verify if Activity Operated Within Budgeted
    (adjusted IHCE/Contract) Costs
  • Verify if Activity Met Quality and Workload
    Standards in PWS

9
Management Assertion
  • Prior to the Post Award Review, the Requiring
    Activity Must Assert that the Service Provider is
    Ready for Review
  • Workload Information Ready
  • Cost Data Ready
  • Performance Data is Available and Ready
  • Modification File is Complete
  • If Assertion is Made, the Post Award Review Will
    Commence
  • If Assertion Cannot be Made, Post Award Review
    Will Not be Performed
  • Implications . . . . .

10
Review Approach
  • Workload Changes
  • Actual vs. Projected Costs
  • Performance (against APLs)

11
Guidance for a Successful Review
  • Document All Adjustments (Deviations/Modification
    s to MEO Management Plan and Cost Estimate)
  • Modification Changes in Workload or Mission
    -- additive cost adjustment
  • Deviation Avoidance of Mission Failure --
    non-additive cost adjustment

12
Deviations/Modifications Guidance
  • 3rd Party Perspective
  • Would a KO reasonably grant a mod to another
    contractor under similar circumstances?
  • Yes o No
  • General Process
  • Site Manager Submits Request
  • Requiring Activity Approves or Denies
  • Timely -- Proactive vs Reactive

13
Workload Guidance
  • Closely Monitor Workload
  • Track all workload identified in the PWS
  • Good source Crosswalk
  • Adjust Resources as Needed to Accomplish Workload
  • Request Contract Modification
  • Do it Often!

14
PWS Workload
Work Standard
Calc. FTEs
15
Workload Guidance
  • Closely Monitor Workload
  • Track all workload identified in the PWS
  • Good source MEO Crosswalk
  • Adjust Resources as Needed to Accomplish Workload
  • Request Contract Modification
  • Do it Often!

( or -)
16
Workload Documentation
  • Workload Data for PP1
  • Use PWS Break-out
  • Show workload monthly, if possible.
  • List Changes in Workload/Services Performed
  • New or added
  • Functions deleted
  • Copy of original technical and cost proposals
  • Copy of all modifications to
  • Contract
  • Letter of Obligation

17
Cost Guidance
All
  • Include and Fully Document Adjustment
    (Mods/Deviation) Requests
  • Labor Costs
  • Unloaded
  • Loaded
  • Non Labor Costs

18
Cost Documentation
  • Labor Costs (MEO)
  • Unloaded/Unloaded
  • Overtime/Special Pay/Premiums, etc.
  • Monthly breakout, if possible
  • Non Labor Costs
  • Material/Supply costs
  • Other attributable costs
  • Subcontract costs
  • Travel, training, equipment, etc.
  • Actual Invoices (Commercial)
  • With supporting documentation
  • Outstanding claims
  • Cost adjustments/modifications

19
Performance Guidance
  • Closely Track Performance and Frequently
    (monthly when possible)
  • Pay Attention to All APLs.
  • Use the APLs in PWS exactly!
  • Consider Use of Adjustment Requests
  • Rely on Internal Data Sources

20
Performance Documentation
  • Performance Outcomes Against All APLs
  • Monthly, if appropriate and if possible
  • Results of Quality Assurance Reviews
  • Performance Outcomes Against PWS non-APL
    Requirements
  • Sampled TBD
  • Cure Orders and Get-Well Plans

21
Other Guidance
  • Review Perspective Effectiveness of Service
    Provider (Commercial/MEO) and Administration/Manag
    ement Oversight
  • If a Deficiency is Discovered
  • Fully Document Get-Well Plan
  • Track Progress
  • Use the PWS Contract

22
Benefits of this Approach
  • Service Provider
  • Pass the Post Award Performance Review
  • Be in a Good Position to Pursue HPO (MEO only)
  • Experience a Big Advantage During Any
    Recompetition
  • Management (Government)
  • True Cost and Performance
  • Establish Accountability
  • Future Direction and Payoff

23
Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com