The fundamental attribution error - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 9
About This Presentation
Title:

The fundamental attribution error

Description:

Belief in a just world. But we find only weakly related to perceived risk WHY? ... Maybe just world beliefs 'only matter' when world is viewed as 'threatening' ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:370
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 10
Provided by: AlanLa8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The fundamental attribution error


1
The fundamental attribution error
  • What is it
  • Tendency to overestimate influence of
    dispositional factors when judging others
  • Why you get it
  • Selective exposure (again)
  • Perceptual salience
  • Different processes underlying attributions
  • dispositional ? automatic
  • Situational ? controlled

2
Two famous demonstrations
  • Jones and Harris (1967)
  • Ross, Amabile, and Steinmetz (1977)

3
The College-Bowl Study(Ross, Amabile, and
Steinmetz, 1977).
Quiz-master Contestant
high intelligence
low intelligence
  • Observers contestants
    quiz-masters
  • PEOPLE DOING THE RATINGS

4
Stages of social perception
Observe specific behavior
Identification (encoding)
Inferences about other traits
Inferences about the causes of behavior
(attribution)
Automatic dispositional attribution
Controlled situational correctionbut only if
perceiver has ability and motivation
5
The spotlight effect (Gilovich, Medvec,
Savitsky, 2000)
6
Ideology and attribution
  • Do conservatives and liberals tend to make
    different types of attributions? (e.g. Zucker
    Weiner, 1993)
  • In some domains (e.g. perceptions of poverty)
    conservatives are significantly more likely to
    make dispositional attributions compared to
    liberals
  • Flattering vs. unflattering portraits of liberals
    and conservatives
  • The bad conservative framing
  • The bad liberal framing

7
Belief in a just world (Lerner, 1980)
  • Good things happen to good people, bad things
    happen to bad people
  • Two ways of conceptualizing
  • Cultural belief system
  • Individual difference variable

high
low
8
Belief in a Just World and RiskLambert,
Burroughs, Nguyen, 1999
  • Belief in a just world
  • But we find only weakly related to perceived
    riskWHY?
  • Buffering hypothesis!
  • Maybe just world beliefs only matter when world
    is viewed as threatening in the first place
  • Who sees world as threatening?
  • High RWA

9
Right-wing authoritarianism
Belief in a just world
World perceived as a dangerous, scary place?
Personal buffer against threat?
YES
NO
HIGH PERCEIVED RISK
YES
NO
LOW PERCEIVED RISK
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com