Inequality: a Neglected Dimension of Aid Policy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Inequality: a Neglected Dimension of Aid Policy

Description:

( Contrast Malaysia, Nigeria and Cote d'Ivoire; Peru, Guatemala and Bolivia). Where inequalities are worsening Cote d'Ivoire. Where the state is unresponsive, or ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:57
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: hom4178
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Inequality: a Neglected Dimension of Aid Policy


1
Inequality a Neglected Dimension of Aid Policy
  • Frances Stewart
  • Wilton Park, October 27th 2006

2
Two types of inequality
  • Vertical inequality inequality among
    individuals/households -- VI
  • Horizontal inequality inequality among groups
    (race/ethnic/religious) -- HI
  • Both important
  • and interconnected.
  • Both neglected in aid. Focus here especially on
    HI.

3
How are VI and HI related?
  • VI can be thought of as consequence of between
    group and within group inequality.
  • Reduce HI generally reduce VI.
  • But statistically NOT related across societies.
  • I.e. can have low group inequality and high
    individual inequality (much inequality within
    groups)
  • Or high group inequality, low individual
    inequality
  • Therefore need to consider each separately.

4
Dimensions of inequality or inequality of WHAT?
  • Most measures refer to income or consumption.
  • But other dimensions critical, especially for
    group inequality.
  • Four important
  • Political inequalities, at all levels.
  • Economic beyond income to include assets and
    employment
  • Social access to services and health and
    educational outcomes
  • Cultural recognition and status.

5
Why does inequality matter?
  • Intrinsic importance
  • Instrumental importance.

6
Intrinsic
  • Peoples wellbeing depends on how well they are
    off in relation to others, as well as absolute
    wellbeing (happiness studies).
  • In a group context, peoples identity and
    wellbeing stems in part from how ell their group
    is doing.
  • Being black and feeling blue
  • Humiliated by treatment of group
  • Indigenous in Peru
  • Moslems in UK
  • Catholics in Northern Ireland, historically.

7
Instrumental importance
  • For VI, cannot reach millennium goals in many
    cases without redistribution. Growth alone too
    slow in highly unequal societies.
  • For HI, in societies with heavy discrimination
    not possible to reduce poverty without improving
    position of the group (e.g. northerners in Ghana
    indigenous highlanders in Bolivia).
  • HIs particularly persistent last centuries
  • Efficiency handicapped by deprivation and loss
    of talent.

8
Instrumental importanceinequality and conflict
  • Mixed evidence on VI and conflict more likely to
    be related to criminality than political
    violence.
  • Increasing evidence that HI is related to
    conflict. People mobilise along group lines when
    there are sharp inequalities.
  • E.g. Rwanda Northern Ireland Nepal Cote
    dIvoire Sudan.
  • Global story too.
  • Econometric evidence Ostby Mancini.

9
Conditions in which HIs lead to conflict
  • Strong group identities.
  • Mobilised by leaders.
  • Where there are political as well as
    socio-economic inequalities. (Contrast Malaysia,
    Nigeria and Cote dIvoire Peru, Guatemala and
    Bolivia).
  • Where inequalities are worsening Cote dIvoire.
  • Where the state is unresponsive, or worse.

10
Examples of horizontal inequalities in conflict
situations
11
Need for aid policy to contribute to correcting
inequality
  • In order to help reduce poverty and improve
    efficiency
  • In order to prevent conflict.
  • Policies needed to bring about inclusive
    societies politically, economically, socially
    and culturally
  • This is NOT a consideration in aid at present

12
Present aid policies
  • Aim to reduce poverty and improve efficiency
  • Instruments
  • Aid distribution per capita income good
    policies NOT inequality.
  • Macro-economic policy packages - nothing on
    inequality
  • PRSPs focus on poverty and occasional reference
    to minority groups and gender imbalances, but
    very limited.
  • Projects, distributed according to
    poverty/efficiency nexus.
  • Budgetary support/sectoral support, similar.
  • Governance issues transparency, accountability,
    not distribution.

13
Yet aid can worsen HI
  • Because its the most efficient way of achieving
    other objectives
  • e.g. poverty reduction in Ghana most efficiently
    achieved by projects in South. Southern poverty
    has fallen northern increased.
  • Transmigration policies in Indonesia, supported
    by aid. Led to sharp increase in HIs between
    Javanese and others, especially in land.
  • Growth policies in Mozambique by investments in
    South.
  • Because of implementation issues skewed by
    officials. Cohen
  • aid agency professionals were well aware of the
    possibilities of ethnic biases in all the
    capacity building projects they funded. , they
    went out of their wayto ensure that such biases
    were reduced or eliminated. They were generally
    unsuccessful in these efforts.

14
Aid can worsen HI
  • Macro-economic policy package is blind to
    distributional aspects.
  • Generally favours tradable sector, frequently
    dominated by privileged groups (Ghana Nigeria
    Mozambique Bolivia).
  • Political conditionality also often blind to
    these issues. Majoritarian democracy can worsen
    political HIs.

15
Reforms needed for HIs
  • To accept importance of correcting HIs
  • Monitor HIs
  • Indepth analysis to identify salient groups
  • Statistical review of nature of HIs.

16
Aid policy reforms
  •         Increasing the proportion of aid going
    to ethnically heterogeneous societies.
  •         Discussing the imperative of correcting
    HIs, where large, in policy dialogue note aid
    can be influential accounts for 35 of
    government expenditure in Ghana more in many
    countries.
  •         Introducing HIs as a specific element
    into PRSPs
  •         Considering distribution across groups
    in all public expenditure reviews
  •         Allocating aid resources towards
    deprived groups or regions
  •         Reviewing macro-economic policies to
    consider the implication for horizontal
    inequalities and considering possible changes or
    compensatory policies.
  • Supporting the systematic monitoring of
    horizontal inequalities.

17
Political conditionality and support
  • For inclusive systems of government
  • Democratically inclusive
  • Members of different groups included in
    government
  • Shared powers
  • Federal systems

18
Policies towards HIs CAN work
  • HIs reduced in Malaysia by set of policies
    towards education, employment and assets
  • In N.Ireland use of combination of employment
    and housing policies Fair Employment legislation
    combined with threat of withdrawal of contracts
    by outside money.
  • In Guatemala, post-peace agreements, HIs have
    narrowed but not fast enough.

19
(No Transcript)
20
(No Transcript)
21
HIs in Guatemala
 
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com