Rompre avec le pass - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 47
About This Presentation
Title:

Rompre avec le pass

Description:

New in IP/NoE, enlargement of the consortium to new contractors and new ... This enlargement follows a competitive call launched by the consortium with ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:48
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 48
Provided by: magi180
Category:
Tags: avec | pass | rompre

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Rompre avec le pass


1
Legal Framework
EC TREATY
INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS
PARTICIPATION AND DISSEMINATION RULES
FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME
CONTRACTS
SPECIFIC PROGRAMMES
GUIDELINES ON EVALUATION AND SELECTION
PROCEDURES
Other relevant EC Regulations FINANCIAL
REGULATION
WORK PROGRAMMES
Calls for proposals
2
Guidelines
  • Will provide supplementary information and
    guidance notes
  • Financial guidelines
  • Negotiation guidelines
  • Consortium agreement guidelines
  • Project management guidelines

3
General Principles
  • Reflect requirements of the Legal Framework
  • Simplification
  • No different categories of contractors
  • Reduction of the number of contracts
  • Collective approach
  • Greater flexibility
  • the Work Programme may adjust Rules
  • flexibility in the composition and changes to
    consortium
  • Greater autonomy for participants

4
The instruments
  • RULES APPLIES TO ALL
  • Integrated Projects new
  • Networks of excellence new
  • Specific targeted research or innovation projects
  • Specific research projects for SMEs
  • Co-operative research projects
  • Collective research projects new
  • Integrated infrastructure initiatives new
  • Actions to promote human resources and mobility
    (Some are new)
  • Co-ordination actions
  • Specific support actions
  • Article 169 new (specific rules to this
    instruments)

5
Contract Structure
  • Core contract (standard with specifics of
    project)
  • Annex I (technical tasks - the project)
  • Annex II General Conditions
  • (applicable to every instrument)
  • Annex III Instrument specific provisions
    (specific to instrument)

6
Contract Structure
  • Annex IV - Form A
  • Consent of contractors identified in the
    core-contract (article 1.2) to accede to the
    contract. To be signed by the contractor
    concerned and by the coordinator.
  • Annex V - Form B
  • Accession of new legal entities to the contract.
    To be signed by the new contractor concerned
    and by the coordinator
  • Annex VI - Form C
  • Financial statement per activity. Specific to
    each Instrument and/or type of action. To be
    filled periodically by each contractor

7
Participation
  • New Every legal entity that contributes to the
    project (incl. Project Managers)
  • General Rule Participant contractor
  • Every legal entity contributing to a project
    must have a contractual link with the Community
  • Exceptional cases subject to very restrictive
    rules
  • Third parties identified in Annex I
  • Subcontractors

8
Participation
  • Third parties identified in Annex I
  • In most of the cases they do not participate,
    they simply make their resources available to a
    contractor, this is not a case of participation
    but only a question of eligibility of the cost
    of these resources
  • In exceptional cases participation of
    members of entities such as EEIG,UMR, SMEs
    Associations
  • these entities are contractors (EEIG, UMR)
  • their members can do some of the work on the
    project even though they are third parties
  • contractor and third parties must have a previous
    agreement, normally the constitution
  • the third parties, the agreement and the tasks
    must be identified in Annex I

9
Participation
  • Subcontracting
  • Contractors shall ensure that the work to be
    performed can be carried out by them.
  • Exception where it is necessary to subcontract
    certain elements of the work, this should be
    clearly identified in Annex I.
  • Minor services may be subcontracted
  • which do not represent core elements of the
    project
  • which cannot be directly assumed by contractors
  • where necessary for the performance of the project

10
Signature and entry into force
  • Contractual link of all contractors with the
    Commission
  • New Contract enters into force upon signature
    of coordinator and Commission
  • All the contractors are identified in the core
    contract Art. 1.2
  • Coordinator must ensure other contractors sign
    within delays
  • Distribution of advance - Several options
    available minimum number of participants/all
    participants
  • Evolution of consortium possible
  • where one or more does not sign the Form A
    article 2
  • in case of enlargement (new contractors)
    article 3
  • Project begins in the date established in the
    contract (this can be before the contract enters
    into force but usually later)

11
Amendments
  • Art.10 of Core Contract Art.8 of Annex II
  • Request in writing
  • New at the request of the coordinator, deemed to
    act on behalf of the consortium
  • New Tacit amendments with implicit agreement of
    the Commission within 6 weeks only for
    modification and evolution of the consortium and
    for technical reports
  • New in IP/NoE, enlargement of the consortium to
    new contractors and new activities may be
    foreseen. This enlargement follows a competitive
    call launched by the consortium with evaluation
    of proposals by external experts

12
Financing what ?
  • Community Financial Contribution
  • (Arts 5 and II.24)
  • Based on activities Articles II.2 and II.25
  • Based on costs Articles II.19, II.20 and II.21
  • Based on costs reporting models Art II.22
  • Confirmed by an audit certificate Art II.26

13
Financing
Grant for integration
Grant to the budget
Flat-rate
Networks of excellence ? Integrated Projects
? Specific targeted research projects
? Specific research projects for
SMEs ? Integrated initiatives relating to
infrastructure ? Actions to promote human
resources mobility ? ? Coordination actions
? Specific support actions ? ?
14
Financing
Type of activity (a) Research and technological
development (including innovation related
activity) Demonstration Training Other specific
support activities New Consortium Management
costs reimbursed up to 100 within the limit of
7 of Community contribution (AC contractors
apply FCF)
15
Financing
Type of activity (b)
16
Financing
  • Costs
  • New principles
  • 1 - cost categories are replaced by conformity to
    contractors own accounting rules and legal
    environment
  • 2 - simplify the eligibility criteria
  • 3 - focus resources on the reality and the
    necessity of the cost, rather than on formality
    (cost categories)
  • Therefore, costs must be
  • actual, economic and necessary for the project
  • incurred during the duration of the project
    (exception costs of the final reports)
  • recorded in the accounts (or third parties)
  • and must exclude indirect taxes, duties,
    interests, costs reimbursed in respect of another
    Community project, and not give rise to profit

17
Financing
  • Cost Reporting Models
  • FC actual direct and indirect costs (not
    available for Coordination Actions and Specific
    Support Actions)
  • New FCF (variant of FC) actual direct costs
    flat rate for indirect costs (20 of total actual
    direct costs, except costs of subcontracts - all
    instruments)
  • AC actual additional direct costs flat rate
    for indirect costs (20 of total actual
    additional direct costs, except costs of
    subcontracts - all instruments)

18
Financing
  • SMEs, non- commercial or non-profit
    organisations established either under public or
    private law, international organisations FC/FCF
  • Physical persons AC mandatory
  • Private companies (other than above) FC
  • AC only for those non- commercial or non-profit
    organisations established either under public or
    private law or international organisations that
    do not have an accounting system that allows the
    share of their direct and indirect costs relating
    to the project to be distinguished.
  • General Rule a legal entity applies the same
    cost model in ALL contracts established under FP6
    except may move from AC to FCF/FC or from FCF to
    FC (one way ticket)

19
Financing
  • Costs under FC/FCF
  • Direct costs must be eligible costs that can be
    related directly to the project
  • Indirect costs must be
  • for FC eligible costs determined by the
    contractor, in accordance with its usual
    accounting practices and the definition of
    indirect costs article II.21
  • for FCF a flat rate is applied to the direct
    costs to cover indirect costs.

20
Financing
  • Costs under AC
  • Direct additional costs must be direct costs
    additional to the normal recurring costs of the
    contractor and not covered by any other sources
    of funding.Three possibilities of charging costs
    related to personnel
  • personnel with a temporary contract to complete a
    doctorate 
  • personnel with a temporary contract for working
    under the Community contract concerned 
  • personnel whose employment contract depends full
    or in part on additional external financing.
  • Indirect costs consist of a flat rate applied to
    the direct costs.

21
Financing
  • Receipts
  • Three kinds of receipts must be taken into
    consideration in order to avoid any possibility
    of profit
  • Financial transfers or their equivalent to the
    contractor from third parties 
  • Contributions in kind from third parties
  • Income generated by the project.
  • In the first two cases (financial transfers or
    contributions in kind), these endowments are
    considered as receipts of the project if the
    third party has provided them specifically to be
    used in the project.
  • If, on the other hand, these endowments are at
    the discretion of the contractor they are not to
    be considered as receipts.

22
Financing
  • Receipts
  • In the first two cases, where contributions from
    third parties are used for the project by the
    contractor, the latter is required to inform the
    third party of this use and in accordance with
    the national legislation or practice in force.
  • In the case of income generated by the project
    itself
  • General rule any income generated by the project
    itself, including the sale of assets bought for
    the project, are considered as income to the
    project (receipts)
  • Derogation income generated by the use of the
    knowledge resulting from the project is not
    considered as a receipt

23
Financing
  • Reports and deliverables
  • All reports and deliverables shall be submitted
    within 45 days of the end of the period in
    question.
  • The project is divided into reporting periods of
    12 months for IP and NOE
  • For other instruments, reporting periods are
    established on an ad hoc basis in the contract
  • P1 from month 1 to month X
  • P2 from month X1 to month Y
  • P3 from month Y1 to month Z
  • final from month N1 to the last month of the
    project

24
Financing
  • Reports and deliverables
  • The consortium will submit the following reports
    to the Commission
  • For each reporting period
  • a periodic activity report
  • a periodic management report
  • a report on the distribution between contractors
  • supplementary reports required by Annex to this
    contract
  • an audit certificate when required

25
Financing
  • Reports and Deliverables
  • In addition to the periodic reports of the last
    period, for the last period
  • a final activity report
  • a final management report
  • supplementary reports required by Annex to this
    contract
  • a report on the distribution between contractors
    made after the end of the project of the
    Community financial contribution - shall be 60
    days after receipt of the final tranche

26
Financing
  • Audit certificates
  • Article II.26
  • each contractor shall provide an audit
    certificate prepared and certified by an external
    auditor (for public bodies - competent public
    officer)
  • for each period for which an audit certificate is
    required (article 7 - option 2)
  • every 12 months for IP/NoE (article 7 - option 1)
  • where requesting a Community financial
    contribution exceeding 750.000 for a specific
    reporting period, even though an audit
    certificate is not required for this specific
    period

27
Financing how ?
  • Payment Modalities
  • Periodic pre-financing (based on the applicable
    periodicity)
  • The Community financial contribution is paid to
    the coordinator on behalf of the contractors the
    consortium decides on the allocation of each
    tranche of its between the contractors
    (consortium agreement)

28
Financing
  • Payment modalities
  • The Community financial contribution shall be
    paid in accordance with the provisions of Article
    8 and II.28. Differences between
  • 1 one single reporting period
  • 2 several reporting periods
  • - with an audit certificate for each period
  • - without an audit certificate for each period
  • 3 one single reporting period - lump sum

29
Payments and reporting schedule for an
IP(example of a 4 year contract)
Activity report
Reported costs
Activity report
Detailed work plan
Reported costs
Adjusted advance
Activity report
Detailed work plan
Reported costs
Adjusted advance
Activity report
Detailed work plan
Reported costs
Adjusted advance
Detailed work plan
Initial advance
0 6 12
18 24 30
36 42 48

Months
30
Payments and reporting schedule for a STREP, CA
or SSA(example of a 3 year contract)
Final activity report
Final payment
Reported costs audit certificate (mandatory)
Intermediate pre-financing or payment NB
impact on the total pre-financing
Periodic activity report (mid-term review
optional)
Reported costs (audit certificate if required)
Detailed work plan
Initial advance
0 6 12 14
18 20 24 26 30
36 38

Months
31
LIABILITY (1)
  • New Collective responsibility of the contractors
  • Mechanism by which a contractor may be held
    liable, technically and/or financially, fully or
    partially, for the action of another contractor
  • Why?
  • Reinforce the protection of the financial
    interests of the Community, both quantitative
    (only pay what is due to be paid) and qualitative
    (ensure that the project continues)
  • Consequence of FP6 principle of autonomy of the
    consortium if the money is granted to the
    consortium, which decides on its allocation, then
    the consortium as a whole is to be held liable

32
LIABILITY (2)
  • Implementation applied as a last resort
  • Breach of contract
  • Depending on the nature of the breach, the
    consortium will be invited to find the
    appropriate solution (technical responsibility)
  • If no solution is found, the defaulting
    contractor is excluded and the consortium is
    requested to continue the project (technical
    responsibility with financial consequences)
  • If the consortium refuses to perform
  • 1 - the contract is terminated
  • 2 - the consortium is requested to reimburse
    money owed by the defaulting contractor
    (collective financial responsibility)

33
LIABILITY (3)
  • Implementation limitations
  • Limited in proportion to the participants share
    of costs in the project, up to the total payment
    they are entitled to receive
  • IOs, public bodies or entities guaranteed by
    MS/AS solely responsible for their own debts
  • Exceptions for specific actions for SMEs,
    fellowships, duly justified cases of specific
    support actions
  • Without prejudice to civil and criminal actions
    to be launched against the defaulting contractor

34
LIABILITY (4)
  • Additional impacts
  • Raises awareness among contractors
  • 1 - constitution of the consortium
  • 2 - projects with real and lasting common
    interests (avoid artificial transnational
    projects)
  • 3 - establishment of internal auto-controls and
    checks and balances within the consortium
  • Limits systematic requests for bank guarantees
    and performance of ex-ante financial controls
  • 1 - as foreseen in the new financial regulations
  • 2 - depending on the impact of the limitations
    (risk assessment - to be detailed in Guidelines
    on negotiations)

35
Controls (1)
reinforce scientific monitoring and ex-post
financial controls Simplified and streamlined
ex-ante controls due to the collective
responsibility Simplified and streamlined
day-to-day financial management due to the audit
certificates and the new approach on eligible
costs (no more formal conformity with cost
categories) Reorient resources in qualitative
monitoring and control 1 - assessment of the
scientific outputs 2 - appraisal of the necessity
of the costs with regards to these outputs
36
Controls (2)
  • How?
  • New continuous monitoring by Commission with
    external experts (mandatory for IP and NoE),
    based on simplified procedures (no public
    procurement)
  • Newperiodical reviews of results achieved and
    expenditure made - go/no-go procedure (12 months
    basis for IP NoE - ad hoc for other
    instruments)
  • Technical (incl. ethical), technological, and
    financial audits

37
Sanctions
  • Autonomy implies accountability
  • New in case of irregularity in a contract...
  • 1 - exclusion from the contract
  • 2 - exclusion from OTHER FP6 contracts, and from
    other Community policies
  • 3 - ineligible to participate in FP6 activities,
    and from other Community policies
  • New liquidated damages in case of financial
    overstatement
  • Without prejudice to civil and criminal sanctions

38
Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)
  • Developed on the basis of
  • Feedback from FP5
  • Features of the new instruments
  • contractors may leave/join during the project
  • larger projects

39
Principles
  • Consistency with FP5 (similar concepts)
  • Simplification
  • ? New Same IPR rules for ? all instruments
    (fewer exceptions)
  • ? New Same IPR rules for all contractors
  • Increased certainty, in particular regarding
    access rights (restricted to what is necessary)
  • Increased emphasis on the management of knowledge
    and IP (especially new instruments)

40
General Concepts
  • Definitions no major change compared to FP5
  • knowledge, pre-existing know-how, use,
    dissemination, ...
  • Ownership no major changes compared to FP5
  • resides with the contractor (incl. JRC)
    generating knowledge
  • exception for SME actions cooperative research
    - SMEs own results not the RTD Performers
  • collective research - SME associations own
    results
  • transfer of ownership prior notice to other
    participants Commission (possible objection
    within 30 days)
  • public procurement (Commission owns results)

41
General Concepts -
  • Protection
  • Where there is commercial application and subject
    to legitimate interests, it is a requirement to
    protect
  • Where there is no protection, Commission may
    protect
  • Publication
  • allowed if not detrimental to protection
  • prior notice to Commission other contractors
    (possible objection within 30 days)
  • Use / dissemination
  • Obligation to use and disseminate
  • Commission may disseminate itself if needed

42
Access Rights
  • General principles
  • New Granted on written request, access rights for
    use of anothers results only where necessary
    (not by right)
  • No sub-licensing (unless explicitly agreed
    possible optional clause for software)
  • Obligatory Access Rights between contractors
    limited to what they really need (either for
    carrying out the project or for using their own
    knowledge) but broader Access Rights may be
    freely negotiated
  • Access Rights granted to third parties
    Commission may object

43
Access Rights
  • New features
  • Feedback from FP5 need for pre-existing know-how
    (Pre-Existing Know How ) to be better safeguarded
  • New Possibility for a contractor to exclude
    specific Pre-Existing Know How from the
    obligation to grant Access Rights to the others
  • with the agreement of all participants
  • before the contractor concerned signs the
    contract (or before entry of a new contractor)

44
FP6 System of Access Rights
Access rights to
Access rights to
pre-existing know-how
knowledge
If a contractor needs them for carrying out its
own work under the project
For carrying out the project
Royalty-free unless otherwise agreed before
signing the contract
Royalty-free
If a contractor needs them for using its own
knowledge
For use (exploitation further research)
Non-discriminatory conditions to be agreed
Royalty-free unless otherwise agreed before
signing the contract
Possibility for participants to agree on
exclusion of specific pre-existing know-how
before signature of the contract (or before
entry of a new participant)
45
Consortium Agreement
  • WHY ? (1)
  • 1 - Mandatory unless excluded by the call for
    proposals
  • 2 - Management of the consortium
  • distribution of funds paid to the consortium (via
    the coordinator)
  • no automatic pre-allocation of the funds among
    contractors to be decided by the consortium
  • evolution of the work programme
  • organisation of work to be carried out
    (sub-projects)
  • reports presented and submitted by the consortium
    (via the coordinator)
  • evolution of the consortiums composition
    (modification)

46
Consortium Agreement
  • WHY ? (2)
  • 3 - IPR issues should be agreed before signature
    of the contract (mandatory for specific
    Pre-Existing Know How exclusion)
  • 4 - Global Risk Management collective
    responsibility
  • technical implementation of the action
    collective responsibility of the contractors
  • consortium to deal with breach of contract /
    non-performance and imposition of financial
    collective responsibility and any financial
    security necessary for same

47
Consortium Agreement
  • Issues
  • Decision-making process
  • governance may range from 1 participant, 1
    vote to elective dictatorship, via the
    shareholder approach
  • IPR
  • - ensure that agreements necessary for the
    implementation of the project have been reached -
    exclusion of background/sideground
  • - initiate common strategy on dissemination/use/p
    rotection search for industrial partners
  • Global Risk Management
  • - establish internal auto-control and a checks
    and balances mechanism (periodic distribution of
    the funds, progress reporting, etc).
  • - specific issues regarding competitive calls,
    costs less than EC funding etc for specific
    instruments
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com