Title: Classical Conditioning
1Classical Conditioning
- Ivan Pavlov (1849-1936)
- Influenced by Dr. William Beaumont
- St. Martins Experiment
- Story of Pavlovs puppies
- Classical Conditioning Learning in which a
previously neutral stimuli acquires the
capability of evoking a response previously
evoked by another non-neutral stimuli - Unconditioned stimulus (US) A non-Neutral
stimulus - ex. Cupcake
- Unconditioned Response (UR) Response to a
non-neutral stimulus - ex. Salivating at the sight of a cupcake
2Conditioning
- Conditioned Stimulus (CS) When paired with US
begins to evoke response previously evoked by US - Conditioned Response (CR) Response now evoked by
CS - CR not always as strong as UR
- dinner bells
- cognitive expectation effects?
- Timing
US
Simultaneous
CS
Trace
CS
Delayed
CS
Backward
CS
3Pavlov Continued
- Delayed and Trace seem to work best
- within .5 seconds
- US effects
- works best with powerful US (hunger and pain)
- ex. doorknobs
- CS effects
- certain organisms respond better to certain kinds
of stimuli - dogs and auditory stimuli
- visual stimuli, sex and the human male
- should be novel stimuli
4Compound Stimuli
- Represents a problem for Classical conditioning
- stimuli are rarely presented consistently or
alone - can classical conditioning account for most
learning? - Overshadowing
- one potential CS is more effective in a compound
stimuli scenario - ex. Bells and student shuffling at end of class
- sometimes the weaker stimuli can succeed if more
powerful one goes away - more novel data is more powerful
- ex. Screeching tires at accident
- Blocking One stimuli blocks learning potential
of another - quieter dentist drills
- tastier meds
5Extinction
- Elimination of CR by presentation of CS alone
- Pavlov rings bell, no food
- doesnt always work particularly with fear
responses - consider dog phobia
- how (according to CC) would it develop?
- Yet extinction does not seem to occur
- Spontaneous Recovery
- tendency for previously conditioned responses to
reoccur after extinction once the pairing begins
again - fire alarms, school and real fires
6Problems with Classical Conditioning
- Works best with novel stimuli and biological
imperitives - Presentation of stimuli in real world
- Very passive form of learning
- not effective in life threatening situations
- Easily overcome by cognitive factors
- Thus, while part of the puzzle, CC is just one
facet of human learning
7Operant Conditioning
- Skinner
- Skinner Box
- disliked use of private events
- Redefines what is ok to be studied by
psychology - previously focused highly on mental events
- Now focuses exclusively on external events
- gradually repudiates existence of mind
8Contingency
- Behavior takes place in a context
- environmental stimuli
- environmental consequences
- Antecedent Stimulus
- sets up the behavior
- ex. Ask a question
- commands to a dog
- Response Behavior of the critter after
antecedent stimulus
Stimulus
Stimulus
Response
9Consequent Stimuli
- How the environment ultimately reacts to the
critters behavioral response to antecedent
stimuli - reinforcement or punishment
- increase or decrease rate of behavior on which
they are contingent - Primary reinforcers have biological significance
- ex. Food, drink, sex, etc.
- Secondary reinforcers acquire reinforcing
properties due to prior learning - ex. Getting an A on test
- can be a bit tenuous
10Reinforcement and Punishment
- Reinforcement leads to an increase in behavior
- Positive reinforcementadding something good
- candy reward, money, praise
- Negative reinfocementtaking away something bad
- nagging, electric shock
- Punishment leads to a decrease in behavior
- Positive punishmentadding something bad
- electric shock, spanking, yelling
- Negative punishmenttaking away something good
- removing privileges, withdrawing love, silent
treatment - Controversies on Punishment
11Operant Conditioning The Good the Bad and the
Ugly
- Operant conditioning is a trial and error based
approach to learning - flying a plane?
- Rewards and punishments often unclear,
contradictory, or completely lacking - Some behaviors continue in spite of little
reinforcement - romantic liaisons
- Like most psyche theories is ultimately guilty of
the hammer hypothesis - discounts important cognitive factors
- discounts freewill