Can Civil Society Influence Policy Making for Vulnerability Reduction - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Can Civil Society Influence Policy Making for Vulnerability Reduction

Description:

Pastoralists migrate in search of water and pasture. ... have been found to respond positively by watering their animals less regularly. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:55
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: isabella
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Can Civil Society Influence Policy Making for Vulnerability Reduction


1
Can Civil Society Influence Policy Making for
Vulnerability Reduction?
  • Isabella Masinde, Advisor, Reducing Vulnerability

2
Abstract
  • The presentation is based on experiences from
    work carried out in Northern Kenya by ITDG-EA and
    other CSOs in water conservation as it relates to
    the drought cycle management. It highlights how
    advocacy can bring change in the policies and
    activities of all levels of government, NGOs,
    civil society, community organizations, aid
    agencies, private sector and individuals.

3
Key words
  • Water sources
  • Water and livelihoods
  • Water and conflict
  • Water and the drought cycle
  • Interventions (normal stage,
  • lert stage, emergency stage and recovery stage)
    Advocacy
  • Audiences The advocacy process.

4
Water and livelihoods
  • Water is a critical resource for pastoralists and
    agro-pastoralists livelihoods. Pastoralists
    migrate in search of water and pasture. Accessing
    the critical balance of water and pasture is one
    of the key skills in pastoralism. Civil Society
    works with the local people in the following
    areas
  • Water interventions. These reduce vulnerability
    at household level in various ways that include
  • Reduces time needed to fetch it when it is closer
    to the household. This means that women can spend
    more time doing other productive work.
  •         Improved nutrition and health because
    when there is enough water, the household and the
    herd can stay together. Small children can easily
    access milk.

5
Water and livelihoodsctd
  • Less time spent trekking to water points means
    more time for grazing. Animals are healthier, put
    on more weight and produce more milk.
  •         Well sited water interventions mean
    grazing pressure is better distributed.
  • Example in Marsabit district during the
    1999/2000 drought, ITDG with funding from USAID
    worked with local communities to dig out troughs
    that acted as water pans. These were lined with
    plastic sheets and water was delivered by
    tankering every 3 days of the week. The water was
    used for domestic and livestock purposes. A
    similar intervention was carried out in Wajir by
    Oxfam GB.

6
Water sources
  • Drought prone areas have few water sources.
    Communities rely on
  • Shallow groundwater from temporary wells in dry
    river beds.
  • Water pans that hold water up to 3 months after
    the end of the rains.
  • Springs in hills and forests
  • Others include permanent water supplies such as
    boreholes, piped water, traditionally excavated
    wells, etc.

7
Water sourcesctd
  • Paying for water has helped many communities to
    sustain interventions that are otherwise
    expensive to maintain such as boreholes. A
    community in Samburu District relied on shallow
    wells, dug along seasonally dry river valleys.
    These were 10 km away, and were unable to supply
    the communitys water needs. A borehole was
    installed to pump water to a tank, from where
    pipes distribute it to four points in the
    village. They now walk for only 1 km to fetch
    water and have started kitchen gardens. Each
    household contributes only Ksh 50 per month to
    sustain the scheme and pay the attendants. The
    Samburu Wings of Mercy initiated this
    intervention.
  • Government has borrowed the idea of
    commercialisation of water which was introduced
    by Civil Society to Water Users Associations
    (WUAs) in order to attain sustainability after
    project completion. This has been incorporated in
    the new water Act.

8
Water and conflict
  • Tensions usually arise between different groups
    of pastoralists or pastoralists and the crop
    farmers when the water available is little due to
    drought or breakdown in the supply systems. Civil
    society intervenes by providing conflict
    management solutions. Ex. Samburu sand dam.

9
Water and the drought cycle
  • Good water and pasture management is essential
    during the entire cycle for all water users. As
    compared to crop farmers and town folk,
    pastoralists have been found to respond
    positively by watering their animals less
    regularly. Civil society support their
    initiatives by offering training in pasture
    management and maintenance of boreholes as part
    of preparedness, and developing early warning
    systems.

10
Advocacy
  • The main objective is to bring policy change.
    Local people have little influence as their needs
    are disregarded. In addition, the current
    policies separate relief and development
    interventions. This creates a cycle where drought
    is seen to interrupt normal development work when
    in actual sense, it should have been anticipated.
    Organizing them into lobby groups has helped to
    bring their issues on the national agenda, e.g.
    in the constitutional review, the PRSP, and the
    draft policy for arid and semi arid lands and the
    National Disaster Management Policy.

11
Audiences
  • The decision makers at primary level and those
    who influence the decisions at secondary level
    need to be targeted. Both traditional governors
    and the parliamentarians need to understand the
    issues so that they can influence them in their
    policy making forums. Civil Society has worked
    well with Pastoralist Parliamentary Groups in
    bringing the issues to parliament. The media can
    play a crucial role in highlighting an issue e.g.
    the plight of Turkana that was highlighted even
    at international level. 
  • Involve relevant departments on the ground.

12
Conclusions
  • Civil Society Organizations have had a great
    impact on the policy formulation/reviews in
    Kenya. The government has used case studies from
    CSOs to inform policy formulation.
  • CSOs organized CBOs to lobby for the formation of
    a Pastoralist Parliamentary Group who could
    articulate their concerns in parliament. They
    have worked well with CSOs on issues of conflict
    resolution, lobbying for markets for livestock,
    animal health services and water management in
    drylands.

13
Conclusion ctd
  • The CSOs have facilitated the formation of and
    build capacity of user groups such as Water
    Users Associations, Peace Committees and
    Livestock keepers who are recognized by the
    formal structures at the district and national
    level.
  • Issues of drought prone areas have gained
    international attention due to interventions by
    CSOs through information sharing, case studies,
    and by participating in other international
    events such as the UNDP Equator Awards.
  • The most important contribution form CSOs is
    empowering the communities through capacity
    building, provision of skills and tools that
    ensures sustainability after project completion.

14
Pictures courtesy of Eric Ogara
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com