Conformity - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Conformity

Description:

Obviously, there are times where conformity, and obedience, are crucial ... 'learner's' objections become more vehement until they stop responding altogether ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:393
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: rayg53
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Conformity


1
Conformity
  • How similar are we to sheep and lemmings?

2
Is Conformity Good or Bad?
  • Due to our upbringing in American culture,
    individuality has a certain allure
  • But
  • Another word for individualist is deviant
  • Another word for conformist is team player
  • Obviously, there are times where conformity, and
    obedience, are crucial
  • Despite Hollywoods depiction, research
    (Schacter Kruglanski) shows that the conformist
    is liked more

3
Definitions
  • Conformity a change in attitude or behavior due
    to the real or imagined presence of others.
  • Compliance a change in behavior, but not
    attitude, due to the results of social pressure.
  • Acceptance a change in both behavior and
    attitude.

4
Muzafer Sherif
  • Will social norms evolve in the laboratory?
  • Utilizes autokinetic effect to set up ambiguous
    stimulus.
  • Participants first provide estimates of amount of
    movement by themselves.
  • Then in a group of three, overall estimates tend
    to converge so that the three people provide
    similar answers.

5
Suggestibility
  • Norm formation is, of course, just one form of
    suggestibility.
  • Yawning
  • Chameleon effect (non-verbal matching)
  • Phillips research on copycat suicides
  • Mass psychogenic illnesses
  • Groupthink

6
Groupthink
  • Irving Janis coined the term groupthink
  • When concurrence seeking overrides realistic
    appraisal
  • Factors that lead to groupthink
  • Self-censorship
  • Illusion of unanimity
  • Direct pressure on dissenters
  • Illusion of invulnerability
  • Illusion of morality
  • Stereotype and dismiss competitors

7
Solomon Asch
  • Asch (19511956) completed two studies that
    demonstrate how easily conformity occurs
  • Naïve subject is brought into lab with 6-8
    confederates
  • Asked to make a judgment about line length
  • Subject is seated next to last
  • In 12 of 18 trials confederates provide the wrong
    answer DV is whether subject follows
  • Ordinarily subjects make mistakes 1 of the time,
    in this experiment 36.8 of the time

8
Influences on Conformity in Asch
  • Size of group as group size increases to 3
    others, conformity increases. After that, little
    change
  • Presence of one dissenter decreases conformity
    immensely
  • If dissenter disagrees with both it still reduces
    conformity
  • The more wrong the majority was, the less
    influence
  • The greater the privacy, the less conformity
  • Accuracy versus approval issue
  • Also known as informational vs. normative
    influence.

9
Variables that Increase/Decrease Conformity in
General
  • Decrease lack of unanimity
  • Decrease induce individual to make commitment to
    their initial judgment
  • Decrease high-self esteem individuals
  • Decrease Individualistic vs. Collective cultures
  • Decrease feeling of security in a group
  • Increase expert power
  • Increase similarity of group to the individual

10
Stanley Milgram Obedience to Authority
  • Participants brought into experiment on learning
    through punishment.
  • Participant is always the teacher, the
    confederate is always the learner.
  • Everytime that the learner is wrong on a word
    recognition task the teacher must administer a
    shock, with the shock increasing by 15 volts with
    each incorrect answer.

11
Stanley Milgram Obedience to Authority
  • As the voltage increases, the learners
    objections become more vehement until they stop
    responding altogether at 345 volts.
  • The question becomes, when do participants
    absolutely refuse to continue (they have to say
    they wont continue 4 consecutive times in order
    for the experimenter to stop the experiment).
  • 65 of the participants went all the way to the
    end (450 volts).

12
Other Variables and Thoughts to Consider
  • Milgram manipulated a number of different
    variables
  • Distance between learner and teacher.
  • Distance between experimenter and teacher.
  • Location of the study.
  • Whether the participant was the shocker or just
    an observer.
  • Foot in the Door/Cognitive Dissonance.
  • Fundamental Attribution Error.

13
Ethical Implications
14
Reactance
  • Sometimes we do say no when our freedom is
    threatened.
  • Romeo and Juliet Effect
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com