Technology Education and Women: Efforts Made at University of Colorado - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Technology Education and Women: Efforts Made at University of Colorado

Description:

13% of advanced placement computer science test takers in secondary school ... Lab a non-talkative environment. CS: assessment individualized, secret ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:48
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: david1404
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Technology Education and Women: Efforts Made at University of Colorado


1
Technology Education and Women Efforts Made at
University of Colorado
Lecia Barker University of Colorado at Boulder
2
Overview
  • Statistics, why it matters
  • Two or three research projects
  • Middle school
  • Undergraduate
  • Graduate
  • National Center for Women and IT

3
Low participation in the US
  • Girls/women comprise
  • 13 of advanced placement computer science test
    takers in secondary school
  • 28 of all CS bachelors degrees
  • 18 of all CS doctoral degrees
  • 20-25 of CS professionals

4
Why should we care? Social issues
  • Pervasiveness of IT
  • Innovation and creativity requires diverse ideas
  • High attrition of women from CS
  • Research across many studies shows that womens
    performance equals mens in CS, math, when
    experience factored out
  • Difficulty fitting into social context, in spite
    of apparent interest

5
Why should we care? Economic Issues
  • IT jobs are 3 of the 10 fastest growing Projected
  • IT job growth far exceeds production of qualified
    workers
  • US women earn on the average 77 of salaries
    earned by men doing the same work

6
Much research outreach,little progress
  • Need unified effort
  • Advocacy with single message
  • Reason for founding National Center for Women and
    Information Technology

7
ATLAS Research atUniversity of Colorado
  • Research of Middle School Girls
  • Research of Undergraduate
  • IT Programs

8
Middle school an age of intense peer pressure
  • Lifetime of experience tells them that computers
    are in the male domain
  • Beginning to see themselves as heterosexual
    beings
  • Election only or one of few girls, path
    breakers
  • Career aspirations

9
How do we persuade girls?
  • Recruiting into a high school computer magnet
  • Ethnographic research observing classrooms,
    outreach program interviews
  • Survey research

10
Typical recruiting practice v. what kids are
attracted to
  • Cool equipment, software, projects
  • If you like computers
  • Fail to recruit girls and non-techy boys
  • Both boys and girls attracted to
  • Able to be with friends
  • Social acceptance, mutual support
  • Technology for freedom of expression
  • Lots of physical movement
  • Enduring relationships with teachers

11
Society of Women Engineers recruiting event
  • 717 girls, mixed race/ethnicity
  • 84 of the girls like computers (no differences
    across groups, age)
  • 81 believe everyone needs to know how to use
    them (no differences across groups, age)

12
Use of computer at home
Latinas significantly less likely to use computer
at home
13
What do you want to do when you grown up?
Latinas significantly more likely to indicate
traditional role Youngest girls more likely to
report I dont know
14
Implications (need more research)
  • Latinas fewer opportunities for informal
    learning, (confidence and attitude issues)
  • Recruit the younger girls
  • Recruiting messages should align girls interests
    with computing (e.g., technology in veterinary
    medicine)

15
Research at undergraduate level
  • Study compared classroom climates of CS, IT
    certificate program
  • gt600 hours classroom observation
  • Interviews with gt170 students
  • Defensive climate in intro/mid courses
  • Impersonal, competition
  • Intimidation for less experienced students (I.e.,
    most of the women)
  • Women feel conspicuous, isolated, and different

16
Comparing teaching, assessment across programs
  • CS lecture, lab
  • Looking to teacher as fountain of knowledge,
    expert
  • CS concepts abstracted from world of experience
  • Rarely hear other students talk about CS
  • Lab a non-talkative environment
  • CS assessment individualized, secret
  • Difficult to gauge ones progress relative to
    other students

17
More open learning in TAM
  • All teaching in labs
  • Mini-lectures followed by hands-on
  • Requests for help frequent both students and
    professors can be experts, novices
  • Public assessment of assignments
  • Required to present, provide critique
  • Heard each other talk in their own terms (not
    professors disciplinary jargon)
  • Could gauge where they stood

18
What does that have to do with women?
  • Research shows women prefer collaborative
    learning environments
  • Women come into CS with less experience
  • Perform as well as their male peers
  • Lose confidence easily because they cannot
    accurately judge their progress (in addition to
    the more difficult environment)
  • Change of pedagogy/learning environment may both
    attract and retain women

19
Introducing the National Center for Women and IT
  • Core at University of Colorado-Boulder
  • Hubs at U California-Irvine and -Berkeley,
    Georgia Tech, U Oregon, Girl Scouts of the USA,
    Anita Borg Institute, ACM, CRA and CRA-W
  • Academic Alliance
  • Industry Alliance
  • Social Science Network

20
Goals Processes
  • Equal participation of women and men in academic
    and industrial careers within 20 years
  • Equal participation at all levels of the
    education and talent pipeline, from K-12 and
    undergraduate and graduate study to professional
    careers
  • Improved communication
  • Social change movement

21
Methods for succeeding
  • Funding and research at all places in the
    pipeline
  • Research-based best practices
  • Ongoing measurements of success
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com