International Debate Education Association - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

International Debate Education Association

Description:

E-Mail: kminch_at_truman.edu or ... Mail: c/o Truman State University, 100 E. Normal, Kirksville, Missouri 63501 USA. Facebook (Truman State University Network) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:17
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: kevin328
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: International Debate Education Association


1
International Debate Education Association
Dos and Donts of Critiquing Debate Rounds Kevin
Minch
2
What do you think your most important duty is
when adjudicating a debate?
3
Evaluating Facts and Checking Opinions
4
Thinking About Arguments
  • Dealing with our personal biases can sometimes be
    difficult.
  • Experience shapes our sense of reality.
  • The power of facts is shaped by the information
    we have been presented with before.
  • To judge fairly, an adjudicator needs to do their
    best to set aside their biases when they enter
    the debate. They need to attempt to give
    arguments a fair hearing.

5
Dealing with Questionable Information
  • Listening to an argument objectively does not
    mean the judge must change their personal views.
  • The ballot / oral critique is the adjudicators
    tool for communicating reservations about
    arguments.
  • Inform the student in your comments that you
    believe their information to be incorrect.
  • Offer constructive suggestions for how they could
    make their argument better, or their information
    more accurate.
  • But, confine the basis of your decision to the
    question Who did the better debating?

6
Good Rules to Live By
  • How an opposing team responds to poor arguments
    may be as important to the debate as the poor
    arguments themselves.
  • Listening critically to an argumentwhether you
    agree with it or notdoes not constitute
    acceptance of that argument as true.
  • Your most important role as an adjudicator is to
    help students learn to make better arguments by
    learning what succeeds and fails in a debate.

7
Negative Adjudication Habits
8
Negative Habits During the Debate
  • Avoid behaviors that suggest to the debaters that
    you are disinterested.
  • Avoid showing overt preference for one side in
    the debate, or a particular argument, while the
    debate is in progress.
  • Avoid forming opinions about the debate, and the
    arguments therein, until the debate is concluded.

9
Negative Habits After the Debate
  • Avoid heavy-handed language that belittles
    debaters for their mistakes.
  • Avoid letting your personal biases overwhelm the
    decision in the debate.

10
Good Adjudication Habits
11
Good Habits During the Debate
  • Listen as attentively as possible to the
    arguments.
  • Take as many notes as you can.
  • Keep track of key arguments in the debate.
  • Make note of constructive criticism you can
    provide after the debate.
  • Provide positive non-verbal reinforcement during
    the debate (smile, make eye contact when
    possible).

12
Good Habits After The Debate
  • Offer both positive feedback and constructive
    criticism. Tell debaters what they did well, but
    also tell them what they can do to improve.
  • Convey your critique in a positive tone. Help
    the debaters feel good about what they have
    learned, even if they lost the debate.
  • Help the debaters to understand what they can do
    to be better at what they do.
  • Remember that even the winning debaters have
    things they can do to improve!

13
Contact Information
  • E-Mail kminch_at_truman.edu or kevin.minch_at_gmail.com
  • Mail c/o Truman State University, 100 E.
    Normal, Kirksville, Missouri 63501 USA
  • Facebook (Truman State University Network)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com