Alueeliset ratkaisut

1
HL7- Finland ry. - Dokumentti-SIG
Dokumentti SIGn 5. kokous 07.05.2002
Aino Virtanen Satakunnan sairaanhoitopiiri,
tietopalvelut
2
Dokumentti SIG - kokousagenda 07.5.2002

• Kokouksen avaus
• HL7 v3 Workshop 22-24.4.2002 palautteiden
  yhteenveto ja keskustelua
• Vesa Pakarinen
• HL7 v3 tulevaisuus meillä - strategia,
  eteneminen, mistä aloitetaan, mikä tärkeää -
  keskustelua Timo Tarhonen
• CDA paikallistamisprojekti CDA-projektin
  tekijät
• - Tilannekatsaus
• - Sisällöllisten kysymysten työstäminen
• - Header-osa, Body-osa, tietosisällöt
• - koodistot, tietotyypit, muotoilukysymyksiä
• Seuraavan kokouksen ajankohta - xx.xx.xxx klo
  xx.xx
• Muut asiat ja kokouksen päätös

12.30
15.30
3
V3 koulutus 4/2002

• 16.4.2002 XML perusteet ja UML/Rose perusteet
• mukana 31 (XML) ja 23 UML)
• 22-24.4.2002 v3 tilannekatsaus
• mukana 43
• Mark Shafarman, Kai Heitmann, Lloyd McKenzie
• Vastaava järjestettiin myös Tanskassa
• Esitykset verkossa jäsensivuilla
• Koko CD opiskelupaketti myös tilattavissa (50
  Eur)
• Kts. työkaluohjelmistopaketti (näitä tarvitset )
• myös XSBrowswer ja Schematron
• 10/2002 Berliinissä järjestetään CDA-workshop
  (Baltimoren jälkeen, myös Australialaiset)

4
Palaute

• Käytössä HL7 standardi palautelomake (0-4)
• Vastaus 61
• Abily to communicate 3,19
• Ability to interact with class 3,09
• Knowledge of the subject matter 3,87
• Did instructor emplasize key points 2,95
• Quality and use of visual aids 3,12
• Overall reaction to presentation 3,12
• 9. Should this course be repeated ?
• yes18 no4 missing3
• 10. Would You recommend this course to
  others yes20 no2 missing3
• 11. Should a repetition for others be held
• yes18 no4 missing3

5
What additional topics should be included

• how to use rational rose
• how to use rose/uml as message modelling tools
• more student exercises, hands-on
• real world implementations, CCOW
• more vocabulary, messaging wrapper classes,
  messaging in practise, conformance claims
• more emphasis on using HL7, details of modelling
  could be reduced
• demo of sending and receiving a message between
  applications
• implementation case of a real project
• more examples

6
What additional handsout would you find usefull

• summaries
• printed terminology at first, all terms got mixed
  up, tutorials to the tools
• prematerial about prerequisites, so one could
  familiarize before
• material was good and sufficient
• a HL7 quick guide or introduction booklet
• reference cards for the key concepts, the big
  picture would help to put things in context

7
1If a follow-up course were held, what topics
should be included

• how to use tools,whole chain from design to
  implementation
• real world example how to use tools to build real
  messages that really work
• more examples of actual live implementations
  maybe
• simple project, how to start utilising v3
• practical approach for vendors
• building a bridge to v2.x a bit wider. An
  addition of 4th day to build a project with v3
  tools
• current status of the standards, methods etc, a
  brief glance on other standards like CCOW
• concrete project as an example during whole
  course
• maybe in other workshop we cpould bring some
  messages from real world. Whole v3 process with
  few examples
• pragmatic issues, message definition and tooling

8
Other additional comments.

• use UML
• one simple use case that will be presented in all
  cases, more microphones
• try to put all possible tooling operational in
  the web
• highlight the key points more clearly, try to
  speak clearly because audience is not native
  speaking english
• it would be nice if exercise would be constructed
  as a single big "project"
• take away prints after each presentation as
  summaries
• separate the MDF and use of tools, real world
  cases. Maybe in 4-6 person groups with tutors
• as a conclusion You did a good work, Thank You ,
  a lot
• So long and thanks for the fish ( no, candies)