How did scientists study nature in the past - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

How did scientists study nature in the past

Description:

Restoring River Otters to the Illinois River; K-6 internet activities. http://www2.ic.edu/beal/otters. Books Use the same format as journals ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:21
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: dbe9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: How did scientists study nature in the past


1
  How did scientists study nature in the past? 
  • Bias
  • To influence in a particular, typically unfair
    direction prejudice.
  • Naturalistsomeone with a passion for and
    knowledge of the natural world

2
How do we study science?
  • Laboratory vs field work

3
What is science?
  • Science A process used to solve problems or
    develop an understanding of nature that involves
    testing possible answers.

4
What is the scientific method?
  • Method of gaining information about the world by
    forming possible solutions to questions, followed
    by rigorous testing to determine if the proposed
    solutions are valid.

5
Presumptions of the Scientific Method
  • Specific causes for observed events.
  • Causes can be identified.
  • General rules can describe observations.
  • Repeated events have same cause.
  • Perceptions are not individualistic.
  • Fundamental rules of nature are universal.

6
The Scientific Method
  • Observation
  • Background literature survey
  • Hypothesis
  • Methods and materials
  • Results
  • Statistics
  • graphs
  • Discussion
  • Conclusion
  • References

7
Observation
  • Occurs when we use our senses, or extension
    thereof, to record an event.
  • Careful, thoughtful recognition of an event.
  • Often leads to additional questions about the
    observations.
  • Asking the right question is critical in
    determining how, and where, to look for answers.
  • Literature Exploration

8
Hypothesis
  • - A testable statement that provides a possible
    answer to a question, or an explanation for an
    observation.
  • A good hypothesis must be logical, account for
    all relevant information, allow prediction of
    related future events, and be testable.
  • Given a choice, the simplest hypothesis with the
    fewest assumptions is the most desirable.

9
Experiment
  • Re-creation of an event enabling an investigator
    to support or disprove a hypothesis.
  • Controlled Separate variables and divide
    experiment into experimental and control groups,
    differing by only one variable.
  • Reproducible Experiment is repeated to
    eliminate unconscious bias.
  • Independent investigators must be able to
    reproduce the experiment.

10
Publishing
  • Results must be published for peers to be able to
    examine and criticize.
  • A hypothesis supported by many experiments and by
    different investigators is considered reliable.

11
Control vs test variables
  • Control
  • Standard, no change, not manipulated
  • Used as a basis for comparison with test variable
  • Test variable
  • Experimental
  • Manipulated
  • Usually changes during experiment

12
Inductive vs Deductive
  • Inductive
  • Intuition
  • insight
  • Used to form hypothesis
  • Deductive
  • Deduce
  • Conclude
  • Interprete
  • Used to evaluate results

13
Laws vs theories vs models
  • Law hypothesis supported by many studies
  • Law of gravity
  • Law of Natural selection
  • Theory supported by some evidence
  • Theory of Evolution
  • Still questions about exact processes
  • Model
  • Physical or written schematic demonstrating how a
    natural event is related to other events.

14
How does the scientific method relate to lab
reports?
  • Introduction
  • Observation What question are you
    investigating?
  • Background Literature review what have other
    scientists discovered on the same topic
  • Describe animal, plant or habitat you are
    investigating.
  • Species descriptions
  • Habitat description
  • Hypothesis form a hypothesis using intuition
    from reading reports of other scientists and
    applying the information to your observation.
  • What do you think is the explanation for what you
    see?

15
How does the scientific method relate to lab
reports?
  • Methods and Materials
  • List materials used to run the experiment
  • Describe how you will conduct the experiment
  • Describe how you will evaluate the experiment
  • Graphs
  • statistics
  • Sometimes the site description goes here

16
How does the scientific method relate to lab
reports?
  • Results
  • Data table
  • Graphs
  • Statisitics
  • Paragraph describing results

17
How does the scientific method relate to lab
reports?
  • Discussion
  • How did your results support your hypothesis (or
    not). What evidence do you have of this?
  • Stats
  • graphs
  • How do your results related to what other
    scientists have found?
  • Do your results relate or contribute information
    to other theories, laws or models?

18
How does the scientific method relate to lab
reports?
  • Conclusion
  • What is your overall conclusion or summary of
    this experiment?

19
How does the scientific method relate to lab
reports?
  • References cited cite your references Journals
  • Beal, D.L. and R.V. Anderson, 1993. The response
    of zooplankton to applications of rotenone in a
    small pond. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 51
    551-556.
  • Internet
  • Beal, D.L. 2000. Restoring River Otters to the
    Illinois River K-6 internet activities.
  • http//www2.ic.edu/beal/otters.
  • Books Use the same format as journals
  • Author, date published, title, edition (if
    available), publisher, number of pages.

20
Scientific Method online Refs
  • http//www2.ic.edu/beal/sciencemethods.html
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com