Is Consciousness a Brain Process - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 32
About This Presentation
Title:

Is Consciousness a Brain Process

Description:

We can agree that every mental state is correlated with some brain state ... They're glued in so I'm wearing them all the time. 'You just forget you're wearing them' ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:87
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: heba3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Is Consciousness a Brain Process


1
Is Consciousness a Brain Process?
  • U. T. Place
  • With some reflections on Dennett

2
Am I my brain?
Your brain on philosophy
3
This isnt a scientific question
  • We can agree that every mental state is
    correlated with some brain state
  • Philosophy doesnt deal with this issue--its a
    matter for empirical science
  • The philosophical question is whether, given the
    results of empirical research, the relation
    between mental states and brain states is
    identity.

4
Why the answer isnt a no-brainer
  • My brain and I dont have all the same properties
  • E.g. I weigh (a lot) more than my brain
  • Its not clear that I am wherever my brain is
  • Could I be a brain in a vat?
  • If my brain were in a vat, would I be there?

5
Hamlet contemplating Yorick
It had been decided that the person sent to
recover the device should leave his brain behind.
It would be kept in a safe place as there it
could execute its normal control functions by
elaborate radio links.
6
Where Hamlet goes there goes Dennett?
In some sense I, and not merely most of me, was
descending into the earth under Tulsa
7
Where Yorick goes there goes Dennett?
Whereas an instant before I had been buried
alive in Oklahoma,now I was disembodied in Houston
8
Where Fortinbras goes there goes Dennett?
I woke to find myself fully restored to my
senses. When I looked in the the mirror though I
was a bit startled
9
Is it an illusion?
As Dennett suggests, our intuitions on these
matters can be inconsistent--and so
unreliable. Thought experiments are merely
intuition pumps
10
Are mental states brain states?
  • Indiscernibility problems
  • Spatial location of experiences
  • Privileged access
  • Qualia
  • Necessity of identity problems
  • Multiple realizability
  • Physicalism, if true, is contingent

11
The Identity Theory pre-history
  • Rylean behaviorism
  • Mental state talk is talk about behavioral
    dispositions
  • Motivation were in the business of analyzing
    ordinary language
  • Problem
  • Works for, e.g. believing, wanting, etc.
  • But not for feely mental states

12
Missing Qualia
Zombies have the same behavioral dispositions we
do but no qualia
13
Reversed Qualia
Same behavioral dispositions but different qualia
14
Privileged Access
How am I?
Youre fine
Behaviorists greeting one another
15
Inner States
  • Behaviorism cant account for psychological talk
    that seems to refer to inner states.
  • An acceptance of inner processes does not entail
    dualism
  • The thesis that consciousness is a process in the
    brain cannot be dismissed on logical grounds

16
Are mental states brain states?
  • Mental state talk cant be analyzed as brain
    state talk because
  • The relation between mental states and brain
    states is contingent
  • But there are other models

17
His table is an old packing case
  • This statement is contingent
  • The senses of table and packing case are
    different
  • But in this case they refer to the same thing

18
But theres a difference
  • Most tables arent old packing cases and most old
    packing cases arent tables
  • Consciousness is a process in the brain is a
    general or universal proposition applying to all
    states of consciousness

19
Logical and ontological independence
  • Typically, were justified in arguing from the
    logical independence of two expressions to the
    ontological independence of the states of affairs
    to which they refer.
  • Since when two characteristics invariably go
    together their linkage becomes embodied in a
    rule of language
  • But there are exceptions

20
A cloud is a mass of droplets
  • Clouds are always masses of droplets
  • But this hasnt become a rule of language
    because
  • We never make the observations necessary to
    verify the statement this is a cloud, and those
    necessary to verify the statement This is a mass
    of tiny particles in suspension, at one and the
    same time

21
When are two sets of observations observations of
the same event?
  • We treat the two sets of observations as
    observations of the same event, in those cases
    where the technical scientific observations
    setprovide an immediate explanation of the
    observations made by the man in the street.
  • In the case of the cloud we could in principle
    make the connection by moving toward or away from
    the cloud.
  • The brain state/mental state case is different,
    so lets try another analogy

22
Lightening is a motion of electric charges
As in the case of consciousness, however closely
we scrutinize the lightening we shall never be
able to observe the electric charges.
23
Mental states are brain states
  • If this account is correct it should follow that
    in order to establish the identity of
    consciousness and certain processes in the brain,
    it would be necessary to show that the
    introspective observations reported by the
    subject can be accounted for in terms of
    processes that are known to have occurred in his
    brain.

24
But what about qualia?!!?!
  • Feely mental states seem to have a character
    that the underlying brain states which account
    for them dont have.
  • E.g. the firing of C-fibers doesnt feel like
    anything but
  • Pain hurts!
  • My mental imagery has a character that brain
    states dont have.

25
The Phenomenological Fallacy
  • The mistake of supposing that when the subject
    describes his experiencehe is describing the
    literal properties of objects and events on a
    peculiar sort of internal cinema
  • The phenomenological fallacydepends on the
    mistaken assumption that because our ability to
    describe things in our environment depends on our
    consciousness of them, our ability to describe
    things in our environment our descriptions of
    things are primarily descriptions of our
    conscious experiences.

26
Seeing a green afterimage
Theres nothing green outside so there must be
something green inside and theres nothing
green in my brain
27
Seeing a green afterimagetopic-neutral
description
Im in a state like the state Im typically in
when Im looking at a green object
28
Does this solve the qualia problem?
  • Not if zombies are naturally possible.
  • If reversed spectra are naturally possible we
    have a dilemma
  • If same mental state only if same brain state
    then multiple realizability is a problem
  • If not then it seems we can have same brain
    state, same sincere reports, but different mental
    states
  • Is that possible?

29
Spectrum Reversal
Suppose I get colored contact lenses that
reverse colors. Theyre glued in so Im wearing
them all the time.
30
You just forget youre wearing them
  • These contacts dont do anything to brain states
    presumably.
  • Years later, having forgotten that Im wearing
    them, all of my behavioral dispositions are back
    to normal.
  • Does it make sense to say that even so I may
    still be seeing things differently from the way I
    used to?

31
Contingent Identity
  • Every thing is necessarily identical to itself.
  • But some true identity statements are contingent.
    How can that be?
  • If a mental state in some sense is a brain
    states, is that the is of identity?
  • Correlation in and of itself is not identity.

32
The Moral
  • Science does not answer philosophical questions.
  • Philosophy does not contradict science.
  • When the scientific questions are answered, the
    conceptual (philosophical) questions begin.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com