Windstream Communications - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 6
About This Presentation
Title:

Windstream Communications

Description:

Since 2002, WIN has lost roughly 25% of its voice customers (and ... VZ transactions, WIN will have the fewest access lines per square mile of mid-size group ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:280
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 7
Provided by: ALL877
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Windstream Communications


1
What the New FCC (and other regulators) Can Do
To Get it Right MARC - Traverse City,
MI Jeff Gardner - President and CEO June 16,
2009
2
Windstream is . . .
A heavily regulated ILEC competing against
lightly regulated communications and
entertainment providers rural focused.
Business Overview As of March 31, 2009
Rural Markets Geographically Diverse Serving 16
States
  • Access Lines 3M
  • Long-distance customers 2M
  • High-speed Internet customers 1M
  • Digital TV (via DISH) customers 295K
  • Since 2002, WIN has lost roughly 25 of its voice
    customers (and WIN leads the industry with the
    lowest rate of access line erosion!)

Not heavily reliant on FUSF
  • Less than 2.50 per line monthly

3
Serving rural consumers . . .
Competitive Environment
Low Density
Access Lines per Square Mile
(1)
  • 60 of lines have cable voice competition
  • 75-80 of lines have broadband competition
  • 100 of lines have wireless competition
  • Following the upcoming CTL/EQ and FTR/VZ
    transactions, WIN will have the fewest access
    lines per square mile of mid-size group

Notes (1) Windstream access lines excludes
CATV and CLEC lines Source Public filings and
investor presentations
4
Our business objectives are aligned with
policymakers objectives . . .
Video Penetration of Total Access Lines
HSI Penetration of Total Access Lines
Year-over-Year Change in Access Lines
Internet speed availability ( of addressable
lines)
Data as of 3/31/09
Source Public filings and Analyst Reports
5
But regulation and market realitiesare in
conflict . . .
  • Then Monopoly era social compact -- exclusivity
    benefit vs. COLR burden reliance on implicit
    subsidies.
  • Now Fierce competition for higher profit
    customers between multiple facilities-based
    providers using various technologies. Inadequate
    support in high-cost areas for mid-sized ILECs.
  • Current regulatory regime is not sustainable.
    Reform urgently needed to reflect modern market
    realities, such as
  • Technology neutral regulatory parity
  • Sufficient, sustainable, and explicit universal
    service/inter-carrier compensation

3
6
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com