Industrial Espionage - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

Industrial Espionage

Description:

The collection of information (most often trade secrets) of a company in an ... from the project by Gillette and fearing job security, Davis sold the trade ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:378
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: mjc61
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Industrial Espionage


1
Industrial Espionage
  • Michael Chwang
  • Alfredo Cuaresma
  • Meissa Dia
  • Ashley Fabeck

2
What is Industrial Espionage?
  • The collection of information (most often trade
    secrets) of a company in an unethical/unlawful
    manner for personal gains or a competitive edge.
  • Trade secret A secret that gives a company an
    edge over its competition. i.e. softdrink
    formulas, fastfood restaurant secret sauce, etc.

3
Increase in Espionage
  • Computers and the internet.
  • Hesitancy to Report theft.
  • Lack of company resource to pursue such matters.

4
Examples of Industrial Espionage
  • Computer hacking
  • Bribery
  • Quitting a job while taking important information
    and use it elsewhere.

5
Case Study
  • Steven Davis V. The Gillette Company Illegal
    sales of Gillettes Mach3 razor design.

6
Steven Davis
  • Process control engineer
  • Employed by Wright Industries, Inc. a company
    contracted by Gillette for development.
  • Davis was contacted by Gillette for design of a
    new shaving system.

7
The Gillette Company
  • Headquarter in Boston, Mass.
  • One of the main providers of shaving goods in the
    market.
  • Contacted Davis for development of new razor.

8
What happened?
  • This new project was considered to be the utmost
    secret by both Gillette and Wright Industries,
    Inc.
  • After being removed from the project by Gillette
    and fearing job security, Davis sold the trade
    secret of the Mach3 shaving system to major
    competitors Warner-Lambert Co. (think Schick
    razors), Bic, and American Safety Razor Co.
  • In 1997, Davis was arrested by the FBI and plead
    guilty to charges with 5 counts theft and
    disclosure of trade secrets, he has been
    sentenced to a 2year and 3 month and a fine of
    250,000 on each count of violation.
  • Gillette suffered a lost of at least 1.5
    million.

9
Legal Issues
  • The Economic Espionage Act of 1996
  • Signed by President Clinton on October 11, 1996.
  • Made theft and misappropriation of company trade
    secrets illegal.

10
Professional Issues
  • Gillette
  • Want to keep their trade secrets private.
  • Need trade secrets to remain competitive.
  • Using ideas to stay innovative.
  • Competitors
  • Need ideas to stay competitive.
  • Save time and money on RD.
  • Davis
  • Worried about job security.

11
Ethical Issues
  • Should we use knowledge we obtained from work for
    personal gain?
  • Should companies perform background search before
    accepting submissions from designers?
  • The competition is just going to end up copying
    it after the new shaver is released.

12
Stake Holders
  • Gillette They spent time and money in RD for
    the new razor.
  • Davis He was worried about his job.
  • The Competition They need as much as possible
    to remain in the market.
  • The consumer The quality and price of the
    shaver would change.

13
Possible Actions
  • Davis could have ask for re-evaluation of his
    performance on the project.
  • Competition
  • Make their own products.
  • Join forces.
  • Reverse engineer.
  • Keep no secrets.

14
Consequences
  • If everyone designed their own products, there
    will be more choices for the consumer, leading to
    better designs.
  • Joining forces might not lead to high profit.
  • If companies kept trade secrets, the similar
    technologies might not develop as fast.
  • However, with no secrets, competition will be
    non-existent.

15
Individual Rights/Fairness
  • Davis had a right to protect his financial
    security.
  • The consumers have a right to choose.
  • Gillette has the right to profit from their
    innovations.
  • Gillette has the right to their designs.

16
Common Good
  • Keeping trade secrets would give people more
    choices.
  • It can make people more comfortable.
  • Price drop.
  • With no secrets, other innovations can come from
    it to help advanced society.

17
Final Decision
  • Davis should not have sold Gillettes secret to
    the competition.
  • The competition should have been cautious.
  • The result was a lose lose situation for both
    Gillette and Davis.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com