Title: Breathing Space Evaluation
1Breathing Space Evaluation
Research Evaluation Mini-conference 28 January
2009
Qualitative Stakeholder, Patient Carer
Interviews Julia Burrows Specialist Trainee in
Public Health
2Todays Presentation
- Summary of qualitative research undertaken so far
- Overview of the latest set of stakeholder
interviews - What happens next?
- Discussion and Questions
3Qualitative Research Summary
- Qualitative Research
- Semi-structured interviews allow people to talk
around a subject and bring up issues that may not
be elicited by direct, specific questioning - Complements quantitative aspects of the Breathing
Space evaluation to enable the triangulation of
all findings to give a richer and more rounded
picture of the impact of Breathing Space
4Qualitative Research Summary
- 2 strands
- Patient and Carer Interviews Before After
- Stakeholder Interviews Before After
5Patient Carer Interviews Before
- Ten patients and seven carers were interviewed by
Julia Burrows, Specialist Trainee in Public
Health, between April and May 2007 before
Breathing Space became operational.
6Patient Carer Interviews Before
- GAPS IDENTIFIED IN ROTHERHAMS COPD SERVICES
- Knowledge and expertise in primary care
- Information (medical and social, for example
about benefits and housing advice or access to
aids and adaptations) - Information about, and monitoring of, individual
condition - Respite care and carer support
- Planned and co-ordinated care so that crisis
management is avoided - Somewhere to contact for information and/or
reassurance for patients and carers (for example
a telephone helpline) - Recognition of COPD
- When the hospital discharges you, you are on your
own, there isnt a lot of expertise out there .
And its crisis management after that (Patient)
7Patient Carer Interviews After
- Nine patients and six carers who have used
Breathing Space were interviewed by Hannah
Jordan, Specialist Trainee in Public Health,
between November 2007 and February 2008.
8Patient Carer Interviews After
- Positive things
- The staff, the staff, the staff
- The other patients
- Confidence in managing breathlessness
- Being cared for by experts / the concentration of
expertise - Not being judged
- Being valued
- The building
- Negative things
- Virtually nothing. One worrying case of not
having understood what Breathing Space was for,
but otherwise only negative comments were along
the lines of maybe a bit more equipment for the
gym -
9Patient Carer Interviews After
- Conclusions
- There is a real need for COPD care in Rotherham
- The care Breathing Space provides is valued
- The care Breathing Space provides is different
- The impact of Breathing Space on smoking
cessation was not covered in these interviews as
there were no current smokers amongst the
patients interviewed - It's made me realise that life is for living,
not for smoking and abusing your body (Patient)
10Stakeholder Interviews Before
- Fifteen stakeholders were interviewed by Mark
Strong, Specialist Registrar in Public Health,
between October 2006 and January 2007 while
Breathing Space was in the final planning stage. - Stakeholders interviewed were
- Patient representative
- Local councillor
- Chief Executives PCT, RFT, CRT, RMBC
- Directors Social Services, Public Health
- PCT Professional Executive Doctor
- Clinicians physiotherapist, GP, Respiratory and
Public Health Doctor - Service Leads Breathing Space, Smoking
Cessation
11Stakeholder Interviews Before
- MAJOR THEMES IDENTIFIED
- Perceptions of COPD
- Doctors
- Patients
- Opportunities arising from BS project
- to improve quality of life
- to right wrongs
- to raise profile of Rotherham
- Threats
- competition between PCT and FT
- risks to funding post 09/10
- The Smoke Free debate
12Stakeholder Interviews Before
- it's a fight for people in Rotherham to make
sure it works, not to get anybody coming in and
saying I don't really think this is going to
work get them away. You know we don't want
people like that, we want people who can see that
vision, and not just see it now, but see it in
two years. (Pt rep)
13Stakeholder Interviews After
- Eighteen stakeholders were interviewed by Julia
Burrows, Specialist Trainee in Public Health,
between October and November 2008 - Interviews
- Length - between 40 and 90 minutes each
- Tape recorded and transcribed
- Analysed and coded for key themes
- Ethics and consent
- Issues about participants being identified by job
title - Report to be published on Breathing Space
Evaluation website
14Stakeholders interviewed for the second time
- Chief Executive, NHS Rotherham
- Chief Executive, Rotherham NHS Foundation Trust
(RFT) - Chief Executive, Rotherham Local Authority
- Director of Public Health, NHS Rotherham
- RMBC Council Member for local Area Assembly
- Expert Patient / Breathe Easy group member
- GP not directly involved with the project
- Smoking Cessation Service Manager, NHS Rotherham
- Service Re-design Lead, Breathing Space
- Chair of Professional Executive Committee, NHS
Rotherham - Consultant in Public Health Medicine, NHS
Rotherham - RFT respiratory consultant not directly involved
with the project
15Stakeholders interviewed for the first time
- Senior Finance/Special Projects Officer, CRT
- Director Adult Services, Rotherham Local
Authority - COPD commissioning lead, NHS Rotherham
- Responsible Director (Provider Services), NHS
Rotherham - Nurse Consultant, Breathing Space
- Clinical Manager, Breathing Space
- Coalfields Regeneration Trust
16Aims of Interviews
- To determine the stakeholders views of Breathing
Space in the 18 months since it had become
operational - To enable lessons to be identified from the pilot
phase
17Key Themes Identified
18Vision
- How do we ensure that this service keeps its
soul? (Initiator) - providing continuityis vital in this program
because of such big cultural changes etc and
occasionally reminding people, you know, what the
original plan was (Initiator) - Collective corporate memory does fade over
timeyou have to create opportunities erm to
refresh peoples memories actually and get
continued buy in (Chief Executive)
19Breathing Space Model
- I wonder whether the service model had been
sufficiently rigorously tested in advance or
whether it was on a bit of a wing and a prayer
and the fact that we have had to significantly
rework the service model for beds is certainly
evidence that it wasnt right - (Chief Executive)
-
- We dont ever get an opportunity to do a whole
service in one go and start with a huge amount of
funding so we were starting from a blank page and
really going for it all in one go rather then
faffing about with bits of posts here and there
but if nobody has done it before you have got
to make it up, havent you? So you make it up as
you go along with all the right skills in place,
and some people found it very challenging - (Initiator)
20Cultural Change
- We were trying to be perhaps that little bit too
untraditional er for peoples comfort - (Initiator)
- Its sort of shifted again to a reactive clinical
model than the upstream public health model - (Initiator)
21Perceived Impact
- I think there is kind of a positive vibe about
the day rehabilitation part of the servicestill
kind of slightly masked by the fact its a
glorious building that has been significantly
underused to date - (Chief Executive)
22Responsibility
- I feel a huge responsibility erm to people who
have COPD and to the wider respiratory community
becauseif with all the resource we have got..I
cant make it work both cost effectively and
making life better for people with COPD..and
carers..then all my colleagues ..throughout the
countryand in Europe wont get the resource to
do it - (BS Operational)
23Local clinicians and managers (not directly
involved)
- They want to be in a bunker on their own and seen
as an ivory tower of excellence - The less you spend on infrastructure the more you
have to spend on people - The most important rehabilitation is to stop
smoking. You dont need a multi million pound
building to do that - All the patients seem to have initial assessment
but then are waiting for things to happen
24Management and Leadership
- What we didnt do was put in extra money for
capacity to initiate a programme it was a
completely different managerial task (Initiator) - I think its very difficult to run a model
wherenoone reports to anyone nobody knows
their boundaries (BS Operational) - Physios wanted to work as physios, the OTs wanted
to work on OT and the nursing staff wanted to
work as nurses because at least if everything
else was all in a muddleyou have a comfort in
what youre doing (BS Operational) - Accepting the fact ...thatithasnt gone quite
to plan andso accepting thatit takes a lot for
people to accept that they are wrong in something
(Patient Rep)
25Evaluation
- Patient feedback appears to be extremely goodand
its doing them goodbut the big problem is we
cant really prove it because the computer
systems, quite frankly, are a disaster
(Initiator) - I think we are making a huge impact but proving
it is going to be hard (BS Operational) - (T)he jury is still out but then Breathing Space
is an experiment, its innovative so one would
expect the jury to be out (Chief Executive) - (We underestimated) the time it takes to get a
new service fully operational (Initiator) - I would suggest any dialogue about any changes in
arrangements or any future funding issuesshould
be initiated sooner rather than later (Chief
Executive) - Theres certainly a nice, lovely, touchy, feely,
happy thing about going which actually I think is
beneficial even if thats all there was - thats
beneficial though youve got to be careful how
much money you put into that happy feeling, but
then I suspect a lot of our work is actually just
to temporarily make people feel better thats,
thats what we do (Local clinician/manager)
26Partnership and Prestige
- None of us could make it happen on our own..(it)
has helped the kind of trust and cooperation and
just person contact that are really useful for
moving on to other changes (Chief Executive) - There is a positive side of having such a
facility in Rotherham and erm the kudos it brings
(Chief Executive) - If I was giving a list of..the top 10 things that
I am really pleased withthis would be one of
them (Chief Executive)
27Political environment
- There isnt any mechanism within the existing
system thatwould allow you to charge a premium
for quality so ..if we owned it.. I couldnt
say because this wonderful new place that is
very beautiful, you are going to have to pay
tariff and a half (Chief Executive) - I think its a wonderful micro commissioning
scenario There needs to be a review of the
scale of Breathing Space in five, six years time
and the question is who will drive it because
its not in the service interests necessarily to
do it (Initiator) - If you can imagine a future where the Primary
Care Trust is just commissioning servicesit will
be an expensive service (Chief Executive)
28Building
- The building politically became one of the things
that would enable funding for the service
(Initiator) - I think it has made them take a bit more pride in
the area. .It looks like a hotel in Dubai
(Local councillor) - The building isnt fit for purpose . Its a
beautiful building but theres a lot of wasted
space (BS Operational) - I think the building up until now has been a
hindrance more than a help (BS Operational) - (T)o see this massive area and when you go to the
atrium it feels nice you know. Its cooler down
there and whether its because you havent got
the ceiling coming down on you.. you feel oh I
can breathe in here its not restrictive
(Patient Rep)
29Patient experience
- I understood why they (patients) thought it was
wonderful but it was quite touching in a way.
People were polite to them and nice to them and
asked them what they wanted to eat and they'd
never had that before. Its very sad - (Local clinician/manager)
30You can stand there at night and you over look
atrium and there would be somebody at the other
side and you will wave and talk and you think you
are on a ship (laughing) its so lovely to be
there (Pt rep)
31Key Themes Identified
32What Happens Next?
- Are there any gaps in the qualitative research
programme? For example - What about patients who attended for assessments
or 1 or 2 sessions and stopped coming? Who are
they? What is their feedback? - What about patients who choose not to come?
- Report to be sent to stakeholders who
participated in research and published on the
Breathing Space Evaluation site
33Discussion
- Any Questions?
- Grateful thanks to the stakeholders for agreeing
to take part in this research