EURISOL Design Study

1
EURISOL Design Study

• NUPECC MEETING
• LNF - DECEMBER 5th, 2003

2
The EURISOL status report

• The Task Group reports are to be supplied as
  Appendices to the EURISOL Report, and are now at
  the Printer. Proofs will be received shortly, and
  printing should take place during December 03.
• The main document, "The EURISOL Report" itself
  is almost complete, and will be circulated to the
  EURISOL Steering Committee members for final
  comment and corrections, and will then be printed
  in early January 2004.
• 600 copies of the Report plus the 5 separate
  companion volumes of the Appendices will be
  mailed out thereafter. A CD version will also be
  available, together with the report, and also
  separately.

3
EURISOL DESIGN STUDY ACTION GENERAL INFORMATION
EURISOL
Design Study
SPECIFIC PROGRAMME STRUCTURING THE ERA
Aim of this specific programme is to remove the Structural weaknesses of European Research
AREA OF INTERVENTION
This activity promotes the development of a fabric of research infrastructures of highest quality and performance in Europe and their optimum use on a European scale.
RESEARCH INFRASTRUCTURES
SUPPORT SCHEME
Aim of this scheme is to contribute, to feasibility studies and technical preparatory work for a potential new infrastructure which have a clear European dimension and interest.
DESIGN STUDY
INSTRUMENT
This instrument aim to contribute actively among other objectives the preparation of future activities
SSA (SPECIFIC SUPPORT ACTION)
4
FP6-2003-INFRASTRUCTURES-4 CALL SPECIFIC
INFORMATION
EURISOL
Design Study

Total budget for the call 70 M
Requested budget About 9 M
Deadline 4 March 2004
Pre-notification proposal before the end of 2003
Acronym EURISOL DS
Consortium agreement not required
Duration of the project 48 months
WRITING GROUP G.Fortuna, P. Butler, Y. Blumenfeld Consultant for Beta-beams M. Lindroos
COORDINATING INSTITUTION GANIL Technical Coordinator John Cornell
The Community support will take the form of grant up to a maximum of 50 of the total cost of the Design Study
5
EURISOL DESIGN STUDY THE SCIENTIFIC GOALS
EURISOL
Design Study
Production of a Detailed Engineering Design (DED), of the facility, in particular in relation to its most technologically advanced aspect (i.e. excluding the detailed design of standard elements of the infrastructure)
Carrying out the Technical Preparatory Work (TPW) related to components, subsystems, material or techniques (dedicated software is included) that are critical for the future development of the new facility
6
EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR SPECIFIC SUPPORT
ACTIONSThe evaluation criteria are organized in
four different areas, to each area specific
weight and threshold are given . The final
threshold of the proposal is 3.5/5
EURISOL
Design Study
EUROPEAN ADDED VALUE (weight 1 threshold 3/5) the extent of the European significance and interest of the proposed infrastructure, in particular in terms of the needs of the potential users and of the opportunities for multidisciplinary research
ST EXCELLENCE (weight 1 threshold 3/5) The extent to which - the proposed new infrastructure is scientifically and technologically original and innovative - the proposed study and work is scientifically and technologically well structured, also in relation to the overall development plans of the new infrastructure.
7
EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR SPECIFIC SUPPORT ACTIONS
EURISOL
Design Study
RELEVANCE TO THE OBJECTIVES OF THE SCHEME (weight 1 threshold 3/5) The extent to which - there is a clear scientific or technological need for the proposed detailed engineering design and technical preparatory work - the proposed study and work is capable of exploring the funding and, where appropriate, the regional and transregional dimensions of the proposed infrastructure.
QUALITY OF THE MANAGEMENT (weight 1 threshold 3/5) The extent to which - the project management and the competence of each partner are appropriate for the intended study and work - there is a clear description and justification of the corresponding budget, divided by tasks and by participants
8
PROPOSAL STRUCTUREA COMPLETE PROPOSAL HAS TWO
PARTS PART A AND PART B
EURISOL
Design Study
It is a set of forms collecting necessary administrative information (activity code, abstract, organisation legal name, address, legal status, cost model, total funding requested, etc) The co-ordinator fills in forms A1 and A3 Participants fill in the A2 form
PART A
The scientific and technical content of the proposal will be given in detail. It describes, among other things, the nature of the proposed work, the participants and their roles in the proposed project. It will be prepared by the Writing Group
PART B
9
PREPARATION O F THE EURISOL.DS PROPOSALIMPORTANT
MILESTONES

• YEAR 2003
• MAY 12th
• THE WRITING GROUP (G. FORTUNA, P. BUTLER, Y.
  BLUMENFELD) IS APPOINTED BY THE EURISOL STEERING
  COMMITEE AT THE ORSAY MEETING)
• END OF JULY
• THE CALL FOR COLLECTING LETTERS OF INTEREST TO
  PARTICIPATE IN THE EURISOL. DS IS LAUNCHED.
• SEPTEMBER 20th
• FOURTY LETTERS OF INTERERST FROM ABOUT 20
  DIFFERENT INSTITUTIONS ARE COLLECTED BY THE
  WRITING GROUP.
• OCTOBER 2nd,3rd
• AT THE EURISOL STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING HELD
  AT LNL 11 DIFFERENT TASKS ARE IDENTIFIED AND THE
  TASKS LEADERS APPOINTED.
• NOVEMBER 14th
• AT ORSAY FIRST OPEN MEETING OF THE TASK LEADERS
  WITH THE WRITING GROUP. A PROVISIONAL WORK
  PLANNING OF THE VARIOUS TASKS IS PRESENTED AND
  DISCUSSED.

10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
EURISOL
Design Study
N.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
TASKS LEADER E-MAIL INSTITUTE NATURE OF WORK
Liquid Metal Target/Ion Source 1 F. Groeschel Friedrich.Groeschel_at_psi.ch PSI PW - PRO - E
Direct Target/Ion-Source 1 J. Lettry Jacques.Lettry_at_cern.ch CERN PW - PRO - E
Solid Converter Target/IonSource 1 L. Tecchio Luigi.tecchio_at_lnl.infn.it INFN PW - PRO E
Safety Radioprotection D. Ridikas ridikas_at_cea.fr CEA SACLAY PW
Heavy-Ion Accelerator Design M-H. Moscatello moscatello_at_ganil.fr GANIL PW -PRO
Proton Accelerator Design A. Facco alberto.facco_at_lnl.infn.it INFN PW - PRO
SC Cavity Development S. Bousson bousson_at_ipno.in2p3.fr IPNO PW PRO
Beam Preparation A. Jokinen ari.s.jokinen_at_phys.jyu.fi JYFL PW - PRO - E
Physics and Instrumentation R. Page rdp_at_ns.ph.liv.ac.uk U LIVERPOOL PW - PRO
Beam Intensity Calculations (Also Protons v Heavy Ions) K.H. Schmidt k.h.schmidt_at_gsi.de GSI PW E
Beta Beams Aspects M. Benedikt Michael.Benedikt_at_cern.ch CERN PW
Global Coherence and Layout TO BE DEFINED
PWPaperwork PROPrototype E Experiment
13

(No Transcript)
14
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE TASKS
EURISOL
Design Study
Liquid metal target 1 ion source the objective of this task is the development of a LIQUID METAL CONVERTER target that can accommodate up to 5 MW proton power. The work package should also investigate the efficient production of singly charged ions of neutron rich radionuclides in the secondary fissile target and ion source system. (F. Groeschel)
1
Direct target 1 ion source the objective of this task is the development of a target and ion source for radionuclide production that can accommodate up to 100 kW power from a beam of protons or heavier ions. The work package should also investigate how to significantly improve the efficiency for the release and ionisation process over that of present target and ion source systems. (J. Lettry)
2
Solid Converter Target and 1 ion-source this task should continue the work already conducted, within the task Target and Ion Sources of EURISOL-RTD -, studying in depth the feasibility and the reliability of neutron converters based on solid materials in the beam power domain of some hundred KW. In other words, it should move from a conceptual design to a much more engineering oriented study, which should better outline and start to freeze technical choices for such crucial facility component, especially in relation with the RIB production target coupling. (L. Tecchio)
3
15
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE TASKS
EURISOL
Design Study
Safety and radioprotection in the framework of this task calculation of radiation production and activation should be performed. The methods for shielding against prompt radiation and for the containment of activity should be studied. This task also should investigate the handling of targets and in particular the disposal of spent targets. The conformity of the proposed installation to the legislation shall be insured. (D. Ridikas)
4
Heavy Ion Accelerator Design this task should continue the work already of the task Post Accelerator and Mass Separator of EURISOL-RTD -, studying in depth dynamics, beam transport and matching of the beam characteristics with the needs of the future experimental campaigns. This task will move from a conceptual design to a much more engineering oriented study, which should better outline and start to freeze technical choices for the subsystems and components of the HI-Accelerator included in the Eurisol machine chain. (M. H. Moscatello)
5
Proton Accelerator Design the task Proton Accelerator Design should continue the work already conducted, within the task Proton Driver of Eurisol RTD, deepening the study of dynamics, beam transport and matching of the beam characteristics with the feasibility of the neutron converter and production target in terms of sustainable power. In other words, this task will move from a conceptual design to a much more oriented engineering study, which should better outline and start to freeze the technical choices for subsystems and components of the proton driver. (A. Facco)
6
16
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE TASKS
EURISOL
Design Study
SC Cavity Development with this task we intended to attack, as first priority, the technical open problems related to the construction of complete cryomodules. It is worthwhile mentioning that such cryomodules should fit the configuration and the design choices of the driver and post accelerator proposed for the EURISOL facility. (S. Bousson)
7
Beam preparation this task is concerned with several aspects of beam preparation for injection into the post-accelerator beam bunching and cooling species purification (e.g. classical magnetic separation or ion trap) charge breeding, multi-user capability. (A. Jokinen)
8
Physics and instrumentation this task should build upon the conclusions of the report published within the FP-5 Eurisol contract (see http//www.ganil.fr/eurisol) to select few key scientific goals and identify the required experimental methods using novel detector technologies. (R. Page)
9
17
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE TASKS
EURISOL
Design Study
Beam Intensity Calculations in the framework of this task a procedure for calculating beam intensities for various accelerator and target configurations in a consistent manner should be devised, in order to compare and choose between different technical solutions. In particular, production yields using primary proton, deuteron and heavy ion beams should be investigated for specific radio-nuclides. The production of nuclei very far from stability by fragmentation of intermediate energy radioactive beams should be explored. The conducting of a limited number of experiments to validate the calculation procedures is encouraged. (K. H. Schmidt)
10
Beta beam aspects the objective of this task is to liaise with the target group to optimize 6He and 18Ne production and the beam preparation group for the development of pulsed ECR source to liaise with the post-acceleration group to develop the design of the storage ring/ rapid cycling synchrotron, decay ring and stacking scheme. (M.Benedikt)
11
Global Coherence and Layout to be defined
12
18
INPUTS FROM ORSAY MEETING

• Need of better defining the border lines of the
  various tasks
• Need of a strong (sub)coordination of the 3
  accelerators (targets) related tasks
• Strong indication of concentrating the resources
  on accelerators and targets tasks(6M out of 9M)
• Need of involving SMEs and non-european( VI FP)
  partners( Triunf, Vinca..)
• Dec.1st,03 final instructions including tabular
  forms to the task leaders

19

• MANAGEMENT SUPPORTING GROUP
• SCIENTIFIC SECRETARY
• ADMINISTRATION
• TECHNICAL COORDINATOR

PROJECT ADVISORY COMMITTEE 3 Members
MANAGEMENT GROUP COORDINATOR2 Members Responsibi
lity for the Execution of the contract  

• STEERING COMMITTEE
• MANAGEMEMENT GROUP
• Representatives of the
• participating institution
• 1 Meeting/Y
• Approval of the planning
• Monitoring of the use of resources
•  

• COORDINATION BOARD
• Management Group Task Leaders
• 2-3 Meetings/Y
• ScientificTechnical Planning
• Task CoordinationGlobal Coherence

• ANNUAL PARTICIPANTS MEETING
• 1 Meeting/Y
• Information Plan between the Project and the
  Community

Task 1
Task 2
Task n
20
Preparation o f the Eurisol.ds ProposalImportant
milestones

• YEAR 2004
• JANUARY 8th
• DEADLINE FOR THE PREPARATION OF AN ADVANCED
  DESCRIPTION OF THE TASKS CONTAINING WORK
  PLANNING, MILESTONES, DELIVERABLES AND REQUESTED
  RESOURCES.
• JANUARY 26th
• PARIS JOINT MEETING OF THE WRITNG GROUP AND THE
  EURISOL STEERING COMMITTE TO EXAMINE THE STATUS
  OF THE PROPOSAL AND ITS GLOBAL COHERENCE.
• FEBRUARY 16tH
• CERN OPEN MEETING OF THE WRTITING GROUP AND THE
  TASK LEADERS FOR THE UPDATE OF THE PROPOSAL DRAFT