Title: Jabu Mabuza
1PRESENTATIONTO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEEON TRADE
INDUSTRY
THE NEW NATIONAL BILL WHAT DOES IT MEAN FOR
EMPOWERMENT AND OTHER GOVERNMENT PRIORITIES IN
THE CASINO SECTOR ?
By
- Jabu Mabuza
- Chairman
- Casino Association of South Africa
- 19 September 2003
2Introduction
- CASA endorses and welcomes many of the proposals
contained in the new bill, including, and among
others - Rationalization of the roles of policy makers and
regulators - The need to respond to the issue of problem
gambling - CASA regrets that there was insufficient
consultation with - The gambling industry, including horse racing
- Empowerment stakeholders
- Organised labour
- Tourism bodies
- Organised commerce
- Financial community, especially international and
local investors
3The Urban Gambling Industry Prior To 1996
- Prior to 1996 A Substantial Illegal Industry
- Widespread up to 150 000 illegal machines in
all urban centres - Easy access to all no age restrictions
- Not regulated
- Public not protected
- Payout percentages manipulated
- Winnings often not paid
- Often associated with criminal elements (drugs,
loan sharks, protection rackets) - No taxes
- No responsible gambling programmes
- Almost totally controlled by whites no
empowerment in equity, management, procurement,
etc
4Legal Gambling Industry Prior To 1996 The Rural
Resort Model
- Prior to 1996 The Legal Industry
- Limited to Homelands
- 15 casinos (six subsequently closed, three sold,
six remain) - Not widely accessible
- Only one operator, unlike today
- Largely self-regulated
- Including a responsible gambling element
- Limited empowerment components
- Mainly institutional investors
- 6 890 slot machines
- Significant tourism infrastructure contribution
in rural areas - Sun City, Wild Coast Sun, Thaba Nchu
5New Dispensation Governments Mission
Accomplished (1)
- The Process Whereby the New Industry was
Established - Two government commissions, extensive
consultation and thorough process - National Gambling Bill 1996 US/Canada/Australia
model of must see entertainment destinations - And subsequent Provincial legislation
- Comprehensive regulatory framework
- Created a successful and well regulated casino
industry - Rigid probity standards and consumer protection
- Supply of gaming, out of control with previous
government, now fixed and contained - Highly competitive licensing process
- Delivered significant non-gaming infrastructure
and meaningful public benefit projects - Two world class convention centres and associated
facilities - Tourist attractions, eg Apartheid Museum, bird
and wildlife centres, sports facilities - Hotels
- Other physical infrastructure, such as roads,
which has acted as a catalyst for other new
investment
6New Dispensation Governments Mission
Accomplished (2)
- Nearly R30-million p.a. in community social
investment - RFPs and subsequent regulations determined
comprehensive response (NRGP) to the issue of
problem gambling - NRGP established as a public/private sector
partnership of government regulators and industry
with R10-million budget p.a. - Internationally recognized as among the best in
the world - Stability and accountability
7CASACasino Association of South Africa
- Voluntary association with legal standing
- All casino operators
- Representative of
- 30 657 employees
- Seven operators, four with international
investors - 30 casinos
- R12-billion in new investment since 1996
- 5 141 new hotel rooms since 1996
- R6-billion annual gross gaming revenue
- R1.7-billion annual tax bill
- R715-million annual pre-tax profits
- R2.5-billion spent with suppliers, 25 of whom
are PDIs - Black Economic Empowerment
- PDIs have 60 voting control, on average, in the
casino sector - PDIs have 38 economic interest, on average, in
the casino sector
8Asking The Question
- Given the achievements of this government in
establishing a legal and regulated framework for
gambling, and given the successes achieved by the
new casino industry, both of which are much
envied by the developed world, it begs the
question - Why was a totally new Bill necessary when the
original objective was to rationalise control of
policy between national and provincial
governments? - Why was there no research into, and consultation
about, the new and unacceptable provisions which
only appeared in draft 11, being the version of
the Bill before you? - Why was there no consultation at all with other
vitally interested parties such as organised
labour, the tourism sector, public safety
agencies, Nedlac, not to mention critical sectors
of the gambling industry, such as horse racing - It is not good enough for the Department to
expect the Portfolio Committee to take
responsibility for this
9Key Issues
- Ministerial discretion to increase the amount of
available gambling in SA - Removing ATMs from all casino complexes and
entertainment centres, race tracks, etc. - Making it illegal, after the fact, to have
casinos located in undefined close proximity to
schools - Making credit illegal, including the use of
credit cards and placing money on deposit - Enforced six hour closures (coincidently a full
shift) - No discounted or complimentary hospitality
services or tourism packages - Requiring already-built casinos to retrofit so as
to make gaming areas invisible
10Likely Impact of the Bill In Its Present Form (1)
- Significant decline in casino revenues (up to
25) leading to - 8 000 to 10 000 jobs lost with the majority among
less skilled workers - Hugely reduced dividend stream and probable
collapse of already fragile empowerment
structures - Certain breach of existing license conditions,
especially in empowerment arena, leading to legal
action in courts throughout the country - Possible constitutional challenges
- Closure of marginal casino operations
- Cross-subsidisation of tourism events and
infrastructure compromised - Significant revenue loss ( R400m) for provinces
and national treasuries
11Likely Impact of the Bill In Its Present Form (2)
- Stakeholders (concessionaires, suppliers, etc)
and indirect employment seriously affected - New investments iced, and capex involved in
retrofitting could mean mothballing of non-gaming
facilities - CSI affordability compromised
- Undermining South Africas image as a country
where it is safe to invest and do business - It is common cause that other sectors of the
gambling industry, including major employers such
as horse racing, will be devastated, with serious
consequences for associated sectors such as
agriculture
12Casinos And The Poor
- Legitimate government concern for the welfare of
poor South Africans, shared by industry - Barriers to entry in the casino sector mean that
the poor do not utilise casino facilities in
meaningful numbers - Cost of casino gambling
- Cost of non-gaming entertainment
- Entrance fees
- Cost of transport
- Measures in the Bill will not ameliorate the
position of the poor, relative to casinos,
because - Poor people do not have credit cards, or qualify
for credit - Free and discounted services are only available
to qualifying customers - Research in South Africa demonstrates that
casino-type gambling is predominantly a
middle-class activity. It also shows that the
poor favour other forms of gambling
13Addressing The UnintendedConsequences Of The
Bill (1)
- Can we do more about addressing the issue of
problem and compulsive gambling, and can we do
things better? This will require a greater
investment from industry, through the NRGP, in
public education, and additional measures are in
process to accomplish this with the SA
Responsible Gambling Trust (SARGT) - But perspective is needed. Why introduce
measures that will - Not fundamentally contribute to helping the 1 of
people who are compulsive gamblers - Inconvenience the vast majority of casino
customers for whom gambling is harmless
recreation - Jeopardise the future of an industry which is an
international success story for this government - Give rise to a resurgence of illegal industry
with no restrictions
14Addressing The UnintendedConsequences Of The
Bill (2)
- Casino companies are obliged to protect
shareholders, and will cut costs to maintain
profitability - Jobs are biggest variable cost
- Reduced purchasing from suppliers
- Reduced dividends to empowerment partners
- This government achieved considerable and
internationally-acknowledged success with its
gambling policy and framework. Dramatic policy
changes, as in the new Bill, must result in
government similarly assuming responsibility for
the outcome and consequences
15More Appropriate, Informed Way Forward
- Time for more perspective on the casino industry
- Research into commercial and socio-economic
implications - More in-depth consultation and understanding of
stakeholders position - Peoples rights in a free society
- Remove negative provisions from the bill
- Consult on measures
- That will not result in political, economic and
thus social problems - That will sustain tourism funding and investments
- Broaden and entrench sustainable BEE
- That will effectively minimise compulsive and
problem gambling - Go forward in partnership together to advance
governments political objectives while
maintaining a healthy, contributory industry