The White Paper and the future for Surrey - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

The White Paper and the future for Surrey

Description:

Blair's vision. Schools to have more freedom. To control assets and staffing ... Tailor education to the needs of each individual child ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:27
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: test317
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The White Paper and the future for Surrey


1
The White Paper and the future for Surrey
  • Anna Wright
  • Director for Schools
  • November 2005

2
Blairs vision
  • Schools to have more freedom
  • To control assets and staffing
  • To build stronger links with external partners
    and sponsors
  • More power and choice for parents
  • Faster intervention where schools are failing

3
Kellys vision
  • Tailor education to the needs of each individual
    child
  • Put parents at the centre of our thinking
    giving them greater choice and active engagement
    in the childs learning and how schools are run
  • Empower schools and teachers to respond to local
    and parental demands, injecting dynamism and
    innovation into our schools

4
The substance - trusts
  • All primary and secondary schools will be
    encouraged to acquire a trust
  • Trust schools will employ their own staff and
    have their own assets.
  • They can seek freedoms from National Curriculum
    and pay regulations.
  • They are funded in the same way as other schools,
    must abide by the Admissions Code of Practice and
    will be subject to the local authoritys
    intervention powers.
  • There can be shared Trusts
  • There will be no new community schools.

5
Parents
  • Parents would be able to ask for a new school to
    be provided to improve standards or meet a lack
    of faith provision.
  • Local authorities will to appoint choice
    advisers to support them by 2008
  • Ofsted to have new statutory power to investigate
    parental complaints
  • All GBs to have regard to views of parents
  • Trust schools to establish parent councils

6
Supporting children and families
  • All schools offering full service extended
    schools by 2010
  • All schools working towards being healthy schools
    by 2009

7
Behaviour and discipline
  • Clear right for teachers to discipline children
  • Schools can use parenting orders to make parents
    take responsibility
  • Parents to take responsibility for supervision
    the first 5 days of an exclusion
  • HTs to work together in developing offsite
    alternative provision
  • LAs to make full time provision for excluded
    pupils
  • More vocational provision

8
Fair admissions
  • There will be an extended transport offer for
    those less well off and charging for others
  • Locally based banding systems
  • Inner and outer catchment areas
  • Specialist schools can offer up to 10 places for
    children with particular aptitudes
  • Everyone subject to Code of practice

9
Personalisation
  • Intensive small group tuition for those falling
    behind (335 m)
  • Stretch for gifted and talented
  • More funding for those with largest numbers of
    children falling behind (60 m)
  • 50 SEN specialism specialist schools
  • Encourage more grouping by ability
  • Publish contextual value added

10
Local education authorities
  • Will decide on response to parents proposal to
    establish new schools
  • Decide on reorganisation proposals (SOC
    disbanded)
  • New intervention powers in response to an adverse
    Ofsted report
  • Can require a school to join a federation
  • Schools in special measure only have one year to
    make progress or be closed
  • Cannot set up new community schools, must hold
    competitions
  • Lead 14-19 reforms

11
  • The rules in the paper are only guidance not
    mandatory, so can ultimately be set aside and
    ignored
  • Chris Leslie, New local
  • government network

12
  • There are very big question marks about the
    extent to which parent power will deliver
    general improvements in standards as against
    relative improvements in some schools at the
    expense of others. And the further diminution in
    the role of local authorities could prove counter
    productive
  • Nick Raynsford
  • Ex Local Government Minister

13
The vision in Surrey
  • Every child and young person will be safe,
    healthy, happy, creative and have the personal
    confidence, skills and opportunities to
    contribute and achieve more than they thought
    possible

14
Our strategy
  • Develop a County Childrens Trust with health,
    LSC, Connexions
  • This trust to have a joint budget and jointly
    commission education, social care, health
    services, and childrens services
  • Commissioning to take place County-wide
  • Commissioning also to take place at local level
    through confederations
  • Schools could join this trust or become
    affiliated to it
  • Schools could also change their confederation
    into a trust

15
What the trust needs to do
  • Develop the capacity of schools to support the
    broad spectrum of childrens development and
    become the foci of their communities in
    collaboration with each other and partners
  • Develop the range of childrens services proven
    to meet the needs of children whose development
    is or is likely to be impaired
  • Develop the capacity of childrens services to
    deliver the new services and decommission others
    that are not effective

16
Ensuring personalisation and inclusion
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com