Retrieval of Memory - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Retrieval of Memory

Description:

But, if you cannot retrieve, then it does not do you any good. Big question ... blue, black, green, pink. Which was the studied word? Found ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:47
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: chsbs
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Retrieval of Memory


1
Retrieval of Memory
  • So, we acquired and retained information. But,
    if you cannot retrieve, then it does not do you
    any good.
  • Big question
  • What are the ways we retrieve information?
  • But, soon we realized that
  • encoding and retrieval are intimately related.

2
How do we retrieve?
  • Two types of retrieval
  • Explicit - direct tests
  • Implicit - indirect tests
  • Direct tests - Conscious retrieval
  • Indirect tests - Unconscious retrieval

3
Direct tests
  • Two types
  • Recall and Recognition
  • Recall
  • Free recall or Cued recall
  • Recognition
  • Yes/No or Forced-choice
  • What are the differences?

4
The amount of retrieval cues
  • Free recall
  • What cues?
  • List 1 apple, orange, persimmon, pear
  • List 2 cabbage, pepper, carrot, corn
  • You can organize these by
  • List context cues
  • Category cues
  • But, at the time of test, you are not provided
    with these cues

5
  • Cued recall
  • You are provided with cues
  • e.g., Fruit - ???
  • Tulving Psotka (1971)
  • Compared free recall and cued recall
  • Cued recall is better than free recall
  • Cued recall reduced the amount of RI

6
What about recognition?
  • Recognition tests provided even greater amount of
    retrieval cues.
  • So, which word was in List 1?
  • banana, mango, persimmon, kiwi
  • Cues present
  • List context cue
  • Category cue
  • Target

7
  • Based on the amount of cues
  • Recognition is often better than cued or free
    recall.
  • Is there any thing else different?

8
Generate-Recognize Model
  • We may use different processes in recall and
    recognition.
  • Kintch (1970)
  • Recall - two processes
  • Generate
  • Recognize
  • Recognition - one process
  • Recognize

9
  • Which one is easier?
  • Recognition
  • Any support?
  • Word Frequency effect
  • High frequency words are easier to recall than
    low frequency words.
  • Low frequency words are easier to recognize than
    high frequency words.

10
  • Why?
  • High frequency words are easier to generate than
    low frequency words.
  • Low frequency words are easier to discriminate
    than high frequency words.

11
But..
  • Evidence against the Generate-Recognize model.
  • Question - Is recognition always easier than
    recall?
  • Generate-Recognize model
  • To make recall easier, make generation easier.
  • When you do that, recall simply becomes
    recognition.

12
  • So, recall can be made equally as easy as
    recognition.
  • But, it cannot be made easier than recognition.

13
Do you want to bet?
  • Tulving and Wiseman (1975)
  • Phase 1 - learn words. Cues would help.
  • train - Black
  • Phase 2 - Recall
  • train - ?????
  • Phase 3 - Recognition
  • Generate words associated with white.
  • blue, black, green, pink.
  • Which was the studied word?

14
Found
15
  • Recall was easier than rececognition.
  • Subjects could recall the words they could not
    recognize.
  • The model was not supported.
  • Then, why recognition is often easier than
    recall?
  • Based on interaction between encoding and
    retrieval.

16
Encoding Specificity
  • Tulving
  • Important - What cues are encoded and what cues
    are present at retrieval.
  • At test, which would be a better cue for
    retrieving the word mouse?
  • Cheese?
  • Boat?
  • You cannot tell until you know which cue was
    encoded at study.

17
  • Encoding
  • Cheese Boat
  • Cheese
  • Retrieval
  • Boat

18
  • What is important is the match in cues between
    encoding and retrieval.
  • The same principle applies to
  • Context dependent memory
  • State dependent memory
  • Mood-dependent memory
  • Mood-congruent memory

19
More recent.
  • Not just cues, but the type of processing should
    match.
  • Transfer appropriate processing
  • Morris et al. (1977)
  • Which one is better deep or shallow level of
    processing.

20
  • At study
  • Deep - Does a word fit into a sentence?
  • Shallow - Does a word rhyme with beagle?
  • Test
  • Deep - Standard recognition
  • Shallow - Rhyme recognition
  • Which words rhymes with the studied words?

21
Found
  • Standard recognition was better when processing
    was deep.
  • Rhyme recognition was better when processing was
    shallow.
  • Its not the depth that is important.
  • What is important is whether processing at
    retrieval matches with processing at encoding.

22
New insight
  • You cannot ask - What is the best way to study
    for the test?
  • Until you know - What kind of test you will
    take.
  • Each test - requires different kind of processing.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com