Nonuniversality of Transverse Momentum Dependent Parton Distribution Functions - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 34
About This Presentation
Title:

Nonuniversality of Transverse Momentum Dependent Parton Distribution Functions

Description:

Distribution functions (collinear, TMD) Observables: azimuthal asymmetries ... collinear. NON-COLLINEARITY. TMD correlators: gluons ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:20
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 35
Provided by: mul123
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Nonuniversality of Transverse Momentum Dependent Parton Distribution Functions


1
Non-universality of Transverse Momentum
Dependent Parton Distribution Functions
TRENTO - 2008
GPD workshop ECT, Trento June 2008
  • Piet Mulders

mulders_at_few.vu.nl
See also Mulders, WHEPP X talk, arXiv0806.1134
hep-ph
2
Outline
OUTLINE
  • Introduction partons in high energy scattering
    processes
  • (Non-)collinearity collinear and non-collinear
    parton correlators
  • Distribution functions (collinear, TMD)
  • Observables azimuthal asymmetries
  • Time reversal odd phenomena/single spin
    asymmetries
  • Gauge links
  • Resumming multi-gluon interactions Initial/final
    states
  • Color flow dependence
  • Applications
  • Universality an example gq?gq
  • Conclusions

3
QCD Standard Model
INTRODUCTION
  • QCD framework (including electroweak theory)
    provides the machinery to calculate cross
    sections, e.g. gq ? q, qq ? g, g ? qq, qq ?
    qq, qg ? qg, etc.
  • E.g.
  • qg ? qg
  • Calculations work for plane waves

_
_
4
Confinement in QCD
INTRODUCTION
  • Confinement limits us to hadrons as quark
    sources or targets (with PX P-p)
  • These involve nucleon states
  • At high energies interference terms between
    different hadrons disappear as 1/P1.P2
  • Thus, the theoretical description/calculation
    involves instead of ui(p)uj(p) for hard
    processes, a forward matrix element of the form

_
quark momentum
5
Leading partonic structure of hadrons
INTRODUCTION
Need PH.Kh s (large) to get separation of soft
and hard parts Allows ? ds ? d(p.P)
hard process
p
fragmentation correlator
distribution correlator
D(z, kT)
F(x, pT)
6
Partonic correlators
INTRODUCTION
  • The cross section can be expressed in hard
    squared QCD-amplitudes and distribution and
    fragmentation functions entering in forward
    matrix elements of nonlocal combinations of quark
    and gluon field operators (f ? y or G).

Distribution functions
Fragmentation functions
7
Probing intrinsic transverse momenta
NON-COLLINEARITY
  • In a hard process one probes quarks and gluons
  • Momenta fixed by kinematics (external momenta)
  • DIS
  • SIDIS
  • Also possible for transverse momenta
  • SIDIS
  • 2-particle inclusive hadron-hadron scattering

We need more than one hadron and knowledge of
hard process(es)!
8
TMD correlators quarks
NON-COLLINEARITY
TMD
collinear
  • Gauge link essential for color gauge invariance
  • Arises from all leading matrix elements
    containing y A...A y
  • Basic (simplest) gauge links for TMD correlators

F-
F
T
9
TMD correlators gluons
NON-COLLINEARITY
  • The most general TMD gluon correlator contains
    two links, possibly with different paths.
  • Note that standard field displacement involves C
    C
  • Basic (simplest) gauge links for gluon TMD
    correlators

Fg,
Fg-,-
Fg-,
Fg,-
10
Process dependence of gauge link
GAUGE LINKS
  • In order to determine gauge link for F(x1,p1T)
    one needs to consider all collinear gluon
    insertions
  • For a given hard subprocess, only the insertions
    attached to (other) external partons contribute
  • They give links to lightcone infinity for parton
    fields in F(x1,p1T) and connecting gauge links
    U0,x in correlator

Two color-flow possibilities
Link structure for fields in correlator 1
C. Bomhof, P.J. Mulders and F. Pijlman, PLB 596
(2004) 277 hep-ph/0406099 EPJ C 47 (2006) 147
hep-ph/0601171
11
Process dependence of gauge link
GAUGE LINKS
  • E.g. qq-scattering as hard subprocess
  • The correlator F(x1,p1T) enters for each
    contributing term in squared amplitude with
    specific link

12
example qq ? qq in pp
GAUGE LINKS
Bacchetta, Bomhof, Pijlman, M, PRD 72 (2005)
034030 hep-ph/0505268
13
TMD master formula
APPLICATIONS
14
Result for integrated cross section
APPLICATIONS
Integrate into collinear cross section
?
(partonic cross section)
15
COLLINEAR DISTRIBUTION AND FRAGMENTATION FUNCTIONS
even
odd
c
flip
U
U
L
L
T
T
even
odd
c
U
L
T
16
Result for weighted cross section
APPLICATIONS
Construct weighted cross section (azimuthal
asymmetry)
Why?
  • New info on hadrons (cf models/lattice)
  • Allows T-odd structure (exp. signal SSA)

17
Result for weighted cross section
APPLICATIONS
18
Result for weighted cross section
APPLICATIONS
?
?
universal matrix elements
T-even
T-odd
(operator structure)
FG(x,x) is gluonic pole matrix element
19
TMD DISTRIBUTION AND FRAGMENTATION FUNCTIONS
even
odd
c
U
T even
L
T odd
T
even
odd
c
U
?
L
T
Gamberg, Mukherjee, Mulders, arXiv0803.2632
hep-ph
20
Result for weighted cross section
APPLICATIONS
?
?
universal matrix elements
Examples are CGU 1, CG U- -1, CGU?
U 3, CG Tr(U?)U Nc
21
Result for weighted cross section
APPLICATIONS
?
?
(gluonic pole cross section)
22
example qq ? qq in pp
APPLICATIONS
Bacchetta, Bomhof, Pijlman, M, PRD 72 (2005)
034030 hep-ph/0505268
23
Gluonic pole cross sections
APPLICATIONS
  • for pp
  • etc.
  • for SIDIS
  • for DY

Bomhof, Mulders, JHEP 0702 (2007) 029
hep-ph/0609206
24
example qq ? qq in pp
APPLICATIONS
weighted
Transverse momentum dependent
Bacchetta, Bomhof, Pijlman, M, PRD 72 (2005)
034030 hep-ph/0505268
25
example qg ? qg in pp
APPLICATIONS
weighted
Transverse momentum dependent
D1
Only one factor, but more DY-like than SIDIS
D2
D3
Note also etc.
D4
Bacchetta, Bomhof, DAlesio, M, Murgia PRL 99
(2007) 212002
26
example qg ? qg
UNIVERSALITY
weighted
Transverse momentum dependent
D1
D2
D3
D4
D5
e.g. relevant in Bomhof, M, Vogelsang, Yuan, PRD
75 (2007) 074019
27
example qg ? qg
UNIVERSALITY
weighted
Transverse momentum dependent
28
example qg ? qg
UNIVERSALITY
weighted
Transverse momentum dependent
29
example qg ? qg
UNIVERSALITY
weighted
Transverse momentum dependent
It is possible to group the TMD functions in a
smart way into two particular TMD
functions (nontrivial for eight diagrams/four
color-flow possibilities)
We get process dependent and (instead of
diagram-dependent) But still no factorization!
Bomhof, Mulders, NPB 795 (2008) 409 arXiv
0709.1390
30
Universality for TMD correlators?
UNIVERSALITY
  • We can work with basic TMD functions F(x,pT)
    junk
  • The junk constitutes process-dependent residual
    TMDs
  • Thus
  • The junk gives zero after integrating (dF(x) 0)
    and after weighting (dF?(x) 0), i.e. cancelling
    kT contributions moreover it most likely also
    disappears for large pT

Bomhof, Mulders, NPB 795 (2008) 409 arXiv
0709.1390
31
(Limited) universality for TMD functions
UNIVERSALITY
QUARKS
GLUONS
Bomhof, Mulders, NPB 795 (2008) 409 arXiv
0709.1390
32
TMD DISTRIBUTION FUNCTIONS
even
odd
c
odd
even
U
L
T
33
Conclusions
CONCLUSIONS
  • Transverse momentum dependence, experimentally
    important for single spin asymmetries,
    theoretically challenging (consistency, gauges,
    universality, factorization)
  • For leading integrated and weighted functions
    factorization is possible, but it requires
    besides the normal partonic cross sections use
    of gluonic pole cross sections
  • For TMDs there is no simple universality, but the
    non-universality can be made explicit through the
    process dependence of gauge links.
  • This is a step towards factorization of TMD
    correlators

Related work Bacchetta et al., JHEP 02 (2007)
093 Bacchetta, Boer, Diehl, Mulders,
arXiv0803.0227 Qiu, Vogelsang, Yuan, PLB 650
(2007) 373 arXiv0704.1153 Collins, Qiu, PRD 75
(2007) 114014 arXiv0705.2141 Qiu, Vogelsang,
Yan, PRD 76 (2007) 074029 arXiv0706.1196 Meissn
er, Metz, Goeke, PRD 76 (2007) 034002
hep-ph/0703176 Collins, Rogers, Stasto, PRD
arXiv0708.2833
34
CONCLUSIONS 24/24
END
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com