Title: Start-up Meeting Presentations
1Start-up Meeting Presentations
INCOFISH WP 7
- Before and after WP meeting
2Simple Indicators for Sustainable Fisheries
INCOFISH WP 7
3Outline
- WP Goal
- List of WP members
- Brief introduction to indicators concept
- WP objectives and deliverables
- WP milestones and time table
- Open discussion
4WP 7 Goal
- Identify, apply, and evaluate the use of
indicators that have the potential to end
overfishing
5WP 7 Members are
- Joe Ryan
- Mauricio Castrejón
- Graham Watkins
- Birane Samb
- Rainer Froese
- Amanda Stern-Pirlot
- Michael Ballón
- Carlos Benites-Rodriguez
- Lynne Shannon
- Vachira Lheknim
- Graham Pierce
- Cristina Pita
CABAL S.A., Nicaragua CDF CDF CRODT,
Senegal IfM-GEOMAR IfM-GEOMAR IMARPE,
Peru IMARPE MCM DEAT, So. Africa PSU,
Thailand UNIABDN, Scotland UNIABDN
6Simple indicators
- Fisheries management is not working
- Top-down control
- Informed solely by info. from fisheries biology
- Complex, costly, largely incomprehensible
- Simple indicators
- Reflect condition of fishery
- Rely on low-cost observations
- Can be accepted and applied by stakeholders and
public - Conform to Pressure, State, Response framework
7Let them spawn!
- Indicator Percentage of mature fish in catch
(target 100) - Response Fish ruler demarcating minimum length
for mature fish
8PSR Framework
PRESSURE Recruitment Overfishing (the taking of
immature fish)
STATE Percent mature fish in catch tool
fish-ruler
RESPONSE Let Them Spawn! awareness
campaign Tool fish-ruler
9WP 7 Objectives
- Identify suitable indicators
- Establish parameters needed for indicators for
all relevant species/fisheries - Test management by indicators with stakeholders
and public - Analyze progress and problems
10WP 7 Deliverables
- Review of existing indicators and selection of
suitable, simple indicators (Month 7) - Database to make available the parameters needed
for application of indicators (Month 13) - Web-tool to assist in the application of
indicators - (Month 19)
- Test of indicators with real-world fisheries and
stakeholdersfinal report (Month 34) - The Big 5
11WP 7 Milestones
- 1st Workshop (now)
- 2nd Workshop (Month 20)
12WP7 Meeting Outcomes
13In attendance
- Mauricio Castrejón, CDF
- Vachira Lheknim, PSU
- Christina Pita, UNIABDN
- Graham Pierce, UNIABDN
- Henn Ojaveer, MEI
- Carlos Benites, IMARPE
- Michael Ballón, IMARPE
- Rainer Froese, IfM-GEOMAR
- Amanda Stern-Pirlot, IfM-GEOMAR
14Agreed-upon criteria
- Indicators should be
- Observable by stakeholders, either directly or
through a transparent process - Understandable
- Acceptable by fishers and public at large
- Efficient and within economic resources for
research on a sustained basis - Related to management and have responding
management measures (PSR framework) - Valide.g. accurately reflecting the state of the
resource
15Selected Indicators
Indicator Indicator Required Data Possible responses
1 of mature fish in catch (goal 100) Mean length in pop. or mixed fishery Lm (also eventually length where 90-100 are mature) length frequency of catch Promote capture of mature fish through Fish ruler and info sheet for fish traders
2 of optimum size in catch (goal 100) Length-frequencies from catch or surveys Length-weight relationship for species Same as above
3 mega spawners in catch ( size above optimum length plus 10) (goal 0) Mean max. length in pop or mixed fishery Length-frequencies from catch and surveys MPAs Campaign Let Megaspawners live Only catch cohorts after 1st and before 2nd spawning
4 Bycatch in total catch Possibly charismatic spp. in bycatch Bycatch biomass by fishery Awareness/ propaganda campaign
16Probable target fisheries
Galapagos Lobsters, Sea Cucumbers
Peru Hake, Lumptail Searobin, Peruvian Rock Seabass, Peruvian Banded Croaker
Scotland Haddock, Whiting, Nephrops, Squid, Some Portuguese species?
Thailand Prawns, some fish
Nicaragua Littoral demersals, Lobsters?
Baltic Maybe Zander, Perch, Herring?
17Next Steps
- Each member to assemble data necessary to apply
indicators to his/her fisheries for web portal - (L-F, maturity, bycatch)
- Deadline Month 13 (Next March/April)
- Start thinking about response implementation
- Keep in touch with other WPs re their
indicatorscan we draw correlations?
18General Remarks
Easy part is first The harder part is in
implementation most of the concerns among WP
members and others concerned approaches to using
indicators in mgmt.
We will mostly collaborate with other WP
indicator-related objectives in relation to and
combination with our selected indicators and
overfishing were not an indicator clearinghouse.