Neutrons, quantum bounds, extra interactions' - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

Neutrons, quantum bounds, extra interactions'

Description:

3 Gravitational quantum states of neutrons in the Earth gravitational field ... Very precise measurements exist for both methods, on lead and bismuth nuclei. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:38
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: pou81
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Neutrons, quantum bounds, extra interactions'


1
Neutrons, quantum bounds, extra interactions.
Doesnt need a visa
Guillaume Pignol Valery Nesvizhevsky Konstantin
Protasov
Who did not manage to get a Visa in time
Quantum reflection workshop ITAMP Harvard
2
Outline
1 Quantum reflection of Ultra Cold Neutrons 2
Slow neutrons and extra interactions in the range
between 1 pm and 5 nm 3 Gravitational quantum
states of neutrons in the Earth gravitational
field
3
The institute Laue-Langevin in Grenoble, France
European Synchrotron
Mountain
  • The ILL
  • Nuclear core 53 MW
  • The most intense neutron
  • source in the world

4
Outline
1 Quantum reflection of Ultra Cold Neutrons 2
Slow neutrons and extra interactions in the range
between 1 pm and 5 nm 3 Gravitational quantum
states of neutrons in the Earth gravitational
field
5
Ultra Cold Neutrons (UCN)
  • Optical neutrons
  • wavelength gt2 Ã…
  • interaction with bulk matter described by a mean
    potential (Fermi potential) 100 neV

10 MeV
production
Thermal neutrons
0.025 eV
Optical neutrons
100 neV
Ultra Cold Neutrons
6
Quantum reflection of UCN
Measured reflectivity agrees with Q.M. simplest
calculation (Koester 1986 as an example)
Ultra Cold Neutrons
  • velocity lt 7 m/s
  • wavelength gt 50 nm
  • Elastic reflection 99.99
  • 10-4 inelastic reflection at phonons
  • 10-5 inelastic reflection at
  • surface nanoparticles
  • 10-5 absorption

7
Outline
1 Quantum reflection of Ultra Cold Neutrons 2
Slow neutrons and extra interactions in the range
between 1 pm and 5 nm 3 Gravitational quantum
states of neutrons in the Earth gravitational
field
8
Slow neutrons and fundamental interactions
  • Free neutrons feel all interactions very weakely
  • Weak interaction
  • ß decay 886 s
  • Strong interaction
  • Fermi potentials 100 neV
  • Electromagnetism
  • No electric charge
  • B 1 T induce Zeeman split of 100 neV
  • Gravity
  • 1 m fall neutron increases its energy by 100
    neV

Neutrons can be very sensitive to new
interactions!
9
Extra short range interaction
We assume a new interaction between neutron and
nucleus with A nucleons
Mediated by a new light boson of mass M
High Energy Physics
Modification of gravity
10
Slow neutron scattering with extra interaction
  • Coherent scattering length (Fermi)
  • Isotropic
  • Energy independant
  • Scales as A1/3
  • Not isotropic
  • Energy dependant
  • Scales as A

11
1 Simple nuclear model
We aim to exclude a contribution A in the set of
measured scattering lengths
Random potential model
Peskhin, Ringo, Am. J. Phys. 39 (1971)
  • Square well potential for
  • nuclear interaction
  • Radius R x A1/3
  • Random depth.

12
1 Simple nuclear model extra interaction
We repeated the analysis with an extra force
included
Additional parameter
Random potential model
13
2 Comparing forward and backward scattering
Interference measurement
Bragg diffraction measurement
  • Measurements using interference method
  • sensitive to the forward scattering amplitude
  • one actually measures
  • Measurements using Bragg-diffraction method
  • sensitive to q 10 nm-1 scattering amplitude
  • one actually measures

The two methods for measuring the scattering
lengths do not bear the same sensitivity to extra
force
14
2 Comparing forward and backward scattering
No difference is observed for the nuclei for
which both measures exist
15
3 Comparing forward scattering and total X-section
  • Measurements using optical method
  • sensitive to the forward scattering amplitude
  • one actually measures
  • Measurements using transmission method
  • sensitive to the total cross-section at 1 eV
  • one actually measures

This idea first appeared in Leeb and
Schmiedmayer, PRL 68 (1992)
16
3 Comparing forward scattering and total X-section
Very precise measurements exist for both methods,
on lead and bismuth nuclei. No deviation is
observed There is a hidden difficulty for
scattering at 1 eV, electromagnetic effects have
to be taken into account.
17
Neutrons and extra interactions conclusions
  • Neutron constraints on extra interactions are
    several orders of magnitude better than those
    usually cited in the range 1 pm 5 nm
  • We provided several independant strategies
  • neutron constraints are reliable

18
Outline
1 Quantum reflection of Ultra Cold Neutrons 2
Slow neutrons and extra interactions in the range
between 1 pm and 5 nm 3 Gravitational quantum
states of neutrons in the Earth gravitational
field 1 Gravitational quantum states of
neutrons 2 The GRANIT experiment
19
Gravitational quantum states of neutrons
Q.M. fact a particle bouncing above a perfect
mirror has discrete energy states.
Schrödinger equation
  • The neutron is the best candidate
  • it is electrically neutral and almost stable.
  • This effect has indeed been discovered with the
    ILL UCN source.

20
Universality of free fall violated
Newton equation
Classical free fall independent of mass
Schrödinger equation
Size of the wavefunctions does depend on mass
Watching a neutron falling, one can actually
measure its mass!
21
Discovery of neutron quantum states in 1999
Nesvizhevsky et al, Nature 415 (2002)
CLASSICAL
QUANTUM
22
Current situation
  • Accuracy of position-like observables limited by
    absorber resolution
  • Spectrometry of excited states
  • difficult.

Nesvizhevsky et al, Eur. Phys. J. C 40 (2005)
Next step the GRANIT experiment
  • GRAvity Neutrons Induced Transitions
  • Precise measurement of energy-like observables
  • First measurements start by the end of 2008.

23
To excite resonant transitions
Initial neutron , we apply the perturbation
Probability to observe the neutron in excited
state after time t
Rabi frequency defines the strength of the
perturbation for transition N ? n
One measures differences of energies
One observes resonances
24
To excite resonant transitions
Width of resonances
  • Pulse time needed to resolve neighbouring
    states 10-2 s
  • Flow through mode
  • Ultimate accuracy due to neutron decay
  • Step 1 to observe transitions in flow through
    mode
  • Step 2 to trap quantum states
  • in order to approach ultimate sensitivity

25
Resonant transitions in flow through mode
  • The transition is resonant for a single
    horizontal velocity, that we measure using free
    fall afterwards
  • One can measure the transitions frequencies at
    1 level

26
Trapping quantum states
Measurement sequence
  • Fill the trap
  • Oscillating magnetic gradient
  • Extract neutrons from the trap

Storage time
  • Goal T 1 s
  • Accuracy 10-3 for the transition frequencies.

27
The GRANIT experiment conclusions
  • We observe quantum bounds violating the
    universality of free fall
  • GRANIT will perform precise measurements of the
    spectrum of graviationally bound quantum states
    of neutrons
  • Observing resonant transitions in flow through
    mode
  • Increasing the precision using trapped quantum
    states
  • The spectrometer is under construction,
  • measurements will begin by the end of 2008
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com