Title: The LHC Beam Interlock System
1M. Zerlauth
0v1
2 Outline
- HCC campaign 2009 is progressing very well with
gtgt number of tests performed / shift - Many changes and improvements of test plans,
powering procedures, powering specifities, tools,
have/had to be done for this years campaign - LHC powering system commissioning tools by now
a rather complex construct - Presentation summarizes and answers/provides
hints to some FAQ to further minimize number of
failing tests and (avoidable) test repetition - Focus on operational procedure
- Not included are implementation-issues ie,
errors in sequences, test-plan, LSA, etc
Machine Interlock Systems
3 Conditions before starting a test
- Next step not correctly proposed by sequencer
(especially for PIC1 / PIC2 of mains) - Login as lhcop
- SOC needs to be reserved for your console
- Circuit must not be locked (ie due to previous
failure) - Is previous test completed? Ie the analysis
signed - Check correct short status in SOC editor and
Simulation/normal mode of power converter
Machine Interlock Systems
4 Conditions for starting a test
- Circuit not being ready for testing is most
frequent reason for a failed test - Multitude of conditions required, most frequent
missing (gt90) are - Circuit still locked / super-locked -gt PIC
supervision - QPS controller not yet ready (ie a reset is
needed) or 13kA switches are still open -gt PIC
supervision / Circuit synoptic - CRYO conditions (temporarily) lost -gt PIC
supervision - UPS conditions (temporarily) lost -gt PIC
supervision - What the sequencer is capable/allowed doing in
2009 - Closing of 600A switches
- Resetting of faults in PIC/PC
Machine Interlock Systems
5 Conditions for starting a test
- To avoid unnecessary repetition (and follow-up)
of failed tests, it is strongly recommended to
verify the correct state of the circuit before
launching ANY test, e.g. using Circuit Synoptic
Sequence will work
Machine Interlock Systems
6 Conditions for starting a test
- To avoid unnecessary repetition (and follow-up)
of failed tests, it is strongly recommended to
verify the correct state of the circuit before
launching ANY test, e.g. using Circuit Synoptic
Sequence will NOT work
Machine Interlock Systems
7 Conditions for starting a test
- To avoid unnecessary repetition (and follow-up)
of failed tests, it is strongly recommended to
verify the correct state of the circuit before
launching ANY test, e.g. using PIC Supervision
Machine Interlock Systems
8 Conditions for starting a test
- Be careful with Circuits that have already been
frequently repeated (especially tests where
heaters are fired, etc..) - Dangerous tests PIC2 CIRCUIT QUENCH, PLI.f,
PNO.f - Check in HCC pages history, now of test
repetition also in overall view
Machine Interlock Systems
9Conditions for starting a test
- New version of HCC show now the current
repetition number for the test currently under
execution - By default, green as long as rep lt2, red if
repeated more often - New MPP strategy 2 training quenches allowed,
afterwards open NC and change I_PNO
10 Reasons for failures during sequence
- In addition to quenches, trips, etc the
following things might make a sequence
fail/time-out - Wrong login in sequencer, resulting in RBAC
exception -gt PIC FGC is now under RBAC, only
lhcop will work from CCC island - QPS controller not reset -gt Error message like
QPS.PVSS ST_LOGGING not OK -gt Reset QPS
controller before test - Mismatch of parameters in LSA and power converter
(out of limits exception) -gt ask EPC expert to
re-synchronize or CO to correct LSA - Exceeding I_ERR or I_EARTH limits Considered as
warning only (sequence will halt but not fail) -gt
Confirm with EPC expert and in case accepted skip
step in sequence - CRYO conditions (only CRYO_MAINTAIN), UPS
conditions (only HW signal) -gt Can be checked in
PIC supervision or PIC history buffer
Machine Interlock Systems
11 Reasons for failures during sequence
- Asserting pop-ups too quickly (ie if action not
yet completed) might result in timeouts at a
later stage - Re-trip of agent after automatic reset (e.g. in
RQ6.R7B1 ) -gt Circuit synoptic - PM acquisition in agent blocks (RQ4.L8) -gt
Circuit synoptic
Machine Interlock Systems
12 Signing a test
- Overall outcome of a HCC test is logical AND
between successfully performed sequence PMA
comments - Thus if sequence failed for any reason, even a
passed PMA will not alter the test outcome - For special cases (ie long sequences that failed
with minor errors), outcome should be altered by
CO expert BEFORE signing the test - Automated analysis
- Automated path introduces additional 10 minute
delay to make sure data is present - Currently only PIC2 for 120A and 600A signed
automatically - Test should normally be signed 15 minutes after
the end-time of test - If after this time test does not appear in PMEA
nor in history -gt Call LV-expert - If test is signed by experts (not visible in PMEA
anymore) but not updated in HCC pages (ie next
step proposed) -gt Call LV-expert
Machine Interlock Systems
13 Unlocking of Circuits after Failing test
- Test execution must be sequential, when UNLOCKING
circuits in SOC editor after failure, make sure
no PMA is pending - Test repetition before completion of analysis of
previous test could be dangerous and breaks MTF
upload (requires for sequential upload)
Machine Interlock Systems
14 Re-commissioning of circuit
- Pointer defines commissioning status of a
circuits LAST_PASSED_TEST - If circuit should be re-commissioned (e.g. after
HW change) - Request point owner to move back this pointed in
the SOC editor to the required step (where to
start re-commissioning)
Machine Interlock Systems
15 Cleaning-up
- If sequences have been e.g. repeated by mistake
(and step was already performed correctly) - Complete the test (if not long test, critical,
etc..) - Abort test immediately tell CO expert to delete
test in LSA before signed and copied to MTF - Others?
- Id be happy for your feedback of other
reoccurring issues - Try to include new things answers in these
slide publish on HCC pages and others?
Machine Interlock Systems
16 Machine Interlock Systems