Managing the Supervisory Relationship - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

Managing the Supervisory Relationship

Description:

To engage in thought / discussion in order that future experience of supervision ... this professionally but is noticeably lukewarm towards them in return, and ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:36
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: owne69
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Managing the Supervisory Relationship


1
Managing the Supervisory Relationship
  • Nathan Babiker, ClinPsyD
  • Rotherham, Doncaster and South Humber Mental
    Health Foundation NHS Trust

2
Outline
  • What is Supervision
  • Understanding the relationship
  • What helps, what doesnt
  • Rating Supervision The SRQ (Palomo, 2004)
  • Supervision Contracts
  • Managing Personality Styles
  • Final Reflections on Problem Solving

3
Aims
  • To engage in thought / discussion in order that
    future experience of supervision can be more
    helpful
  • To begin thinking about how to inject core
    psychologist skills into the management of
    supervision
  • To inspire some thought about how personality,
    relationship and other factors can be usefully
    understood and allowed for

4
What is Supervision?
  • A working alliance between a supervisor and
    supervisee, in which the latter can receive
    feedback, guidance and appraisal on their work
    (Inskipp Proctor, 1993)
  • Object is to maximise the competence of the
    supervisee (McGill Salmon, 1995)
  • Achieved by sharing knowledge, enhancing the
    supervisees self-understanding and amplifying
    their creativity (Feltham Dryden, 1994)
  • For further information see Davies, Salmon
    MacDonald (2000). Supervision what works for
    whom? Clinical Psychology Forum, 146 17 - 20

5
Quick Exercise
  • Imagine you and your supervisor(s) are stranded
    on a desert island together

6
  • Who is doing what?
  • What does this tell you about the nature of your
    relationship?
  • Does anything need to be different?

7
What is Good Supervision?
  • Important areas to think about
  • Reassurance
  • Advice
  • Criticism
  • Feedback
  • Expectations
  • Trust

Delivered well / Delivered badly
8
Hirons Velleman (1993)
  • Helpful Unhelpful
  • Direct guidance Dictating what to do
  • Joint problem-solving Lack of direction
  • Reassurance Talking down
  • Theory-practice linking
  • Soliciting ideas
  • Factors which might contribute to effective
    supervision. Clinical Psychology Forum, 57, 11-13

9
Cushway Knibbs (2004)
  • Helpful Unhelpful
  • Rapport Safety Unbalanced
  • Challenge Developmentally inappropriate
  • Direction Intolerant of diffs.
  • Reflection Untrained
  • Direct Learning Professionally apathetic
  • Trainees and supervisors perceptions of
    supervision. In I. Fleming L. Steen,
    Supervision and Clinical Psychology

10
  • Now think of your own.....
  • Helpful vs Unhelpful

11
Supervisory Relationship Questionnaire (SRQ)
  • Devised by Palomo (2004)
  • Rating scale used to assess the supervisory
    relationship on a number of factors
  • Safe Base
  • Structure
  • Commitment
  • Reflective Education (more relevant for Clin ?)
  • Role Model (more relevant for Clin ?)
  • Formative Feedback

12
Supervisory Contracts
  • Scaife (2001)
  • Clarify expectations of both parties
  • Set context of openness / negotiation
  • Set context of shared responsibility
  • Help supervisee reflect on the best conditions
    for learning
  • Clarify evaluative role
  • Identifying the context in which supervision
    occurs

13
  • Think of, and then write down a few ideas that
    follow from these sentences
  • What I want out of supervision is...
  • What I would dislike most in supervision is...

14
  • How could these factors / ideas form the basis of
    a good supervisory contract?
  • What are the key issues that should be contracted
    in supervision?

15
Managing Personality Styles
  • Why is this important?
  • Personality is a key factor in any relationship
  • Right tool for the right job
  • Predictive / premeditative function
  • Insight
  • Key Text
  • Sperry, L. (2003) Handbook of diagnosis and
    treatment of DSM-IV-TR personality disorders (2nd
    Ed.). Routledge.

16
Obsessive-Compulsive Personality Style
  • Characteristics of O-C personality style
  • Desire to complete tasks / projects without error
  • Takes pride in small details
  • Tend towards things being done just right
  • Intense, single-minded effort
  • Careful decision-making, ?indecisive
  • Strong moral principles
  • No-nonsense approach, less emotionally involved

17
Narcissistic Personality Style
  • Characteristics include
  • Good at selling ideas, projects etc
  • Love competition, especially winning!
  • Able to see themselves as best in their field
  • Self belief
  • Good at achieving own goals
  • Can be shrewd in dealing with others for own aim

18
Avoidant Personality Style
  • Characteristics include
  • Prefers the known to the unknown
  • Few close relationships
  • Self-conscious
  • Discrete and deliberate dealing with others
  • Reserved and self-restrained
  • Sensitive about what others think

19
Example Scenarios
  • Think about the particular personality style
    what is it? How is it affecting the problem?
  • Discuss what the best way of approaching the
    problem with the particular supervisor might be
    remember there is no right way!

20
Example Dr. M
  • Dr. M has worked through the ranks of her
    University department and is widely considered to
    be the hardest-working staff member. She
    frequently goes above and beyond the call of
    duty. Because of this, she has managed to
    produce dozens of academic papers despite limited
    departmental resources. Most evenings she takes
    a briefcase home with her, and will frequently
    expect supervisees to do the same, telling them
    they will not get anywhere in the academic world
    if they dont make a little sacrifice. Her
    attention to detail is noteworthy but also
    notorious, she can seem picky and pedantic.

21
Dr. M - Scenario
  • Dr. M has called you into her office to discuss
    your first draft. You think that you have done a
    good job but you still need some helpful pointers
    to move forward. Dr. M spends most of the
    meeting talking about the introduction section in
    detail, critiquing the use of particular
    references and the theoretical model you have
    chosen to focus on.

22
Example Dr. S
  • Dr. S is a field supervisor working in a
    world-renowned heart surgery department. He is
    witty, extroverted and effective at his job. He
    has a reputation for convincing supervisees to
    embark on research projects that contribute to
    his own research. Sometimes this can lead to the
    supervisee taking unnecessary risks with their
    degree and falling short of the university
    requirements. If Dr. S feels his supervisee
    doesnt like him, he handles this professionally
    but is noticeably lukewarm towards them in
    return, and offers less time to supervise them.

23
Dr. S - Scenario
  • Dr. S has been your field supervisor for 6 months
    and you get on well with him. However, you have
    agreed to undertake an ambitious project using
    heart surgery patients and you are finding it
    difficult to collect the data necessary to
    satisfy your university supervisor. Dr. S offers
    reassurance that everything will be fine, but
    you are less convinced and beginning to worry.

24
Example Prof. R
  • Prof. R definitely keeps himself to himself. He
    rarely attends departmental functions and
    normally finds a way to excuse himself early if
    he does. As a supervisor, he is uncertain about
    ideas outside of his expertise, and appears
    unenthusiastic or wary about them. He is
    mysterious and difficult to contact, and very
    little is known about him outside of his academic
    existence. When supervision is booked, he comes
    across as shy and emotionally distant.

25
Prof. R - Scenario
  • You have been having difficulty with Prof. R in
    the very early stages of your research, which is
    becoming uninspiring to you. By coincidence,
    your placement supervisor has an appealing
    project idea that has some links to your own.
    When you suggest it to Prof. R, he is resistant,
    and then avoids further discussion, leaving you
    feeling stuck. It is difficult to contact Prof.
    R at the best of times, and it could be too late
    to change project by your next supervision
    meeting.

26
Reflections
  • How much did you link what you knew about the
    supervisor with the scenario posed?
  • Would it have been easier without the information
    on the supervisors personality?
  • How might this help in the real world?
  • What other reflections on this do you have?

27
Tying it all together...
  • Think of a bad experience in supervision
  • Discuss in pairs
  • What were the important factors in the
    relationship?
  • What were the important factors for the
    individuals (supervisee / supervisor)?
  • How could it have been different?

28
Managing Problems... Advice
  • Explore the problem collaboratively
  • Be clear about misunderstandings
  • Rethink roles / boundaries
  • Contract if necessary
  • At a last resort seek help from 3rd party
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com