Title: TOWARD IMPROVED PREDICTION OF CONVECTIVE PRECIPITATION Mitchell W. Moncrieff Cloud Systems Group NCAR/MMM
1 TOWARD IMPROVED PREDICTION OF CONVECTIVE
PRECIPITATION Mitchell W. Moncrieff
Cloud Systems Group NCAR/MMM
NSF Briefing, March 6
2003
2What are the strategic needs?
- To realize skillful NWP models, global and
regional - To understand the water and energy cycles
- To narrow uncertainties in climate models that
involve moist physics
3CRM Multiscale approach
- Modern cloud-resolving models (CRM) have the
dynamic range to resolve convection and the
multiscale organization of convection, this is
demonstrated by realizations of - warm-season precipitation over the US continent
(Moncrieff and Liu 2003). - convectively-coupled tropical waves (Grabowski
Moncrieff 2001, 2002). - MJO-like systems using CRMs in the
cloud-resolving-convection (super)
parameterization approach (Grabowski 2001
Khairoutdinov Randall 2002). -
4Organized convection
Is organized convection important from the
large- scale perspective?
- Organization product of coupled physical
processes and dynamics. - Climate models parameterizations not designed
to represent organization. - NWP models grid-scale convection is an
unphysical form of organization.
5Parameterization methodology
Prediction models
Measurements
Convection cloud parameterization
Cloud- resolving models
Resolved convection super-parameterization pathw
ay
Dynamical models, stochastic models
6Large-scale forcing
- 2-D CRMs planetary-scale computational domains
enable convection and advective forcing to be
interactive and physically consistent (Grabowski
Moncrieff 2001, 2002). - 3-D CRM computational domains are presently
smaller than the Rossby radius of deformation,
requiring that large-scale forcing be specified. - Accurate forcing not obtainable from standard
measurements alone a role for field campaigns
e.g., GATE, TOGA COARE, IHOP_2002, NAME Tier 1,
among others.
7Warm-season precipitation over US-continent
- Large-scale forcing specified from nested MM5
using NCEP global analysis as a first-guess in
the outer domain. - 10-day composite forcing applied to each day of
CRM simulation -- an ensemble approach. - Questions
- Do CRMs represent sequences of
precipitation? - Improve on parameterized-convection
results? -
- Implications for convective
parameterization?
8Computational domains
Cloud-resolving domain ( )
9Environmental shear
Travel speed of observed sequences (14 m/s)
Same deep shear, increased low-level shear
10Sequences of precipitation
Kain-Fritsch
Grell
Carbone et al. (2002)
Betts-Miller
Betts-Miller
2-D CRM
16 m/s
10 m/s
14 m/s
10 days
16 m/s
14 m/s
14 m/s
6 m/s
14 m/s
5 m/s
5 m/s
Grell
CRM precipitation travels at observed speed (14
m/s) shear is the important quantity
11Total condensate
18 UTC 12 MDT
00 UTC 18 MDT
06 UTC 00 MDT
12 UTC 06 MDT
12System-relative zonal flow (CRM)
Midnight CST
- Steering-level is 7 km (400 mb)
13 Dynamical model
c
Dynamical model steering level 7 km (400 mb),
agrees with CRM and observations
c
c
Steering level
Traditional steering level (700 mb 3 km),
lies outside the solution range
CAPE and shear
Moncrieff and Green (1972)
Compressibility
14Parameterization
Organized deep convection
Ordinary deep convection
Perhaps many grid volumes
Single grid volume
- Organized transport
- Shear effects
- Propagation effects
- Open system
- Dynamically consistent far-field
- Entraining plume
- No shear
- No propagation
- Mass balance within grid volume
- Far-field effects minimal
Ordinary and organized convection can occur
15Conclusions
- In CRM, sequences of precipitation over the US
continent travel at the observed speed (14 m/s)
wind shear the key quantity. - Dynamical models of organized convection provide
a theoretical foundation. - Failure of conventional parameterization
attributed to wind shear not being represented. - 2-D CRMs embedded in GCMs (super-parameterization
) is a new way forward. - Dynamical/stochastic models possible ways to
improve existing parameterization. -