Title: Eye Disability Rating
1Eye Disability Rating
- Fall Conference 2009
- Steve Heye / Jim Sampson
2What is important for me as a CSO to know
- VA updated portion of Rating Schedule that deals
with eyes - Visual acuity will generally be rated on basis of
best corrected distance vision - Certain eye disabilities will be rated either on
- Visual impairment or
- Incapacitating episodes
3Objective of this Training Class
- What changed?
- Effective date
- Specific changes
4What changed?
- Numerous changes, technical and substantive
- See handout for details
5Effective date
- Effective date of new criteria 12-10-08
- Claims received on or after 12-10-08
- Rating under new criteria
- Claim pending on 12-10-08
- Examination and rating under old criteria
6Specific changes
- Reorganized instructions for rating visual
impairment - Now four sections
- 1. Visual impairment (38 CFR 4.75)
- 2. Visual acuity (38 CFR 4.76)
- 3. Visual fields (38 CFR 4.77)
- 4. Muscle function (38 CFR 4.78)
7Number of diagnostic codes
- There were 19 different diagnostic codes
- This has been reduced to 6
- 33 codes revised
- 20 removed
- 2 added
8Measuring visual acuity
- Examination requirements
- Uncorrected and corrected visual acuity for
distance and near must be measured and recorded -
9What is visual impairment?
- 1. Impairment of visual acuity, and/or
- excluding development errors of refraction
- 2. Impairment of visual field, and/or
- 3. Impairment of muscle function
10Causes of visual impairment
- Common causes
- Retinal degeneration, including macular
degeneration - Retinopathy
- Cataracts
- Glaucoma
- Muscle imbalance problems
- Corneal disorders
- Trauma
- Infection
11Distance visual acuity
- Distance visual acuity
- Visual acuity of 20/20 means a person can see on
an eye chart at 20 feet the smallest symbol that
a person with normal visual acuity can see at
that distance - Visual acuity of 20/40 means a person can see on
an eye chart at 20 feet that which a person with
normal visual acuity can see at 40 feet
12Near visual acuity
- Measured by reading print samples of different
sizes - From a card at distance of 14 inches from
persons eye. - Near visual acuity of 14/14 means a person can
read at 14 inches what someone with normal vision
can read at 14 inches
13Methods of evaluating eyes
- Need specialist exams
- Include uncorrected and corrected central visual
acuity - Basis for rating
- Best distant vision after correction by glasses
14Additional considerations
- Other conditions such as multiple sclerosis (MS),
diabetes mellitus, pituitary tumors or CVA
(strokes) can cause visual disturbances - MS can cause partial blindness, pain, diplopia,
or optic neuritis - CVA and pituitary tumors can cause disturbances
in visual fields
15Pyramiding
- 38 CFRÂ 4.14Â Â Â Avoidance of pyramiding
- Dont rate same symptoms under different
diagnoses
16Higher of two evaluations
- 38 CFR 4.83
- Unable to read at a particular scheduled step or
distance, - But able to read at the next scheduled step or
distance, - Rate using visual acuity that permits the higher
evaluation
17Summary of new narrative for 38 CFR 4.75
- Licensed optometrist or ophthalmologist must
conduct examination - Identify disease or injury responsible for visual
impairment - Examinations of visual field or muscle function
only when necessary - Eyes examined with pupils dilated
- Refer to 38 CFR 3.350 if potential entitlement to
SMC
18Summary of new narrative for 38 CFR 4.76
- Record uncorrected and corrected visual acuity
- for distant and near
- Central visual acuity based on best corrected
distance vision even when central scotoma (blind
spot) detected
19Summary of new narrative for 38 CFR 4.77
- Determining extent of concentric visual field
defect - When both visual acuity and visual field impaired
in one or both eyes - Combine under 38 CFR 4.25
20Summary of new narrative for 38 CFR 4.78
- Revises method of evaluating muscle function when
another type of visual impairment also present - A test is used to measure muscle function and to
chart areas of diplopia
21Summary of new narrative for 38 CFR 4.79
- Loss of use of one eye is SMC k.
- Requires 2 findings
- Inability to recognize largest letters on Eye
Chart at 1 foot, and - Perception of objects, hand movement, or counting
fingers cannot be done far away as 3 feet
22SMC for Bilateral Blindness
- Best corrected vision in better eye 5/200 or
less or - Visual field restriction to 5º or less 5/200
- SMC l
- 38 CFR 3.350(b)(2)
23 Evaluation when only one eye is SC
- If only one eye SC,
- Only visual acuity of that eye is evaluated
- Consider visual acuity of the other (NSC) eye to
be 20/40, subject to - 38 CFR 3.383(a)(1), paired organ rule.
- For loss of visual acuity alone, maximum for
single eye 30 - With anatomic loss, maximum 40
- If anatomic loss and cant wear prosthesis ,
maximum 50 -
24Example of evaluation of one eye
2538 CFR 3.383 Paired organs
- If a veteran has SC loss or LOU in one eye only
and impairment of vision in NSC eye (not due to
misconduct) - Then VA compensates the veteran as if both eyes
are SC - For VA purposes, impairment of vision in the NSC
eye means - Best corrected vision is 20/200 or less, or
- Peripheral field of vision for each eye is 20
degrees or less
26No light perception
- VA removed term blindness from titles of
diagnostic codes 6062 and 6064. - In evaluating the visual acuity of one eye, no
light perception is now evaluated the same as
light perception only.
27Conditions considered as refractive error
- VA considers 3 conditions as refractive error
- 1. Regular astigmatism
- 2. Presbyopia (hyperopia, farsightedness)
- 3. Myopia (nearsightedness)
28Refractive errors
- Effect of uncomplicated refractive error excluded
- when considering visual impairment from
standpoint of SC evaluation.
29Congenital or developmental defects
- Normally static conditions incapable of
improvement or deterioration, such as conditions
present at birth that affect eyes or vision
30Establishing SC for congenital or developmental
diseases
- SC may be established for diseases of congenital,
developmental, or familial, hereditary origin
that - First manifest themselves during service, OR
- Pre-exist service and progress at abnormally high
rate during service, and - Hereditary or familial disease that first became
manifest to compensable degree within presumptive
period following discharge from service (38 CFR
3.309(a)
31Incurrence or aggravation of hereditary or
familial disease
- Manifested after entry on duty
- Progresses during service at a rate greater than
normally expected
32Reconciling inconsistent findings with refractive
error
- When dealing with refractive error only,
- If best corrected vision on any examination by VA
is better than on prior examinations, - VA assumes the prior determinations to be
erroneous or at least as not representing the
best correction
33Diagnostic codes 6000-6009
- Formerly evaluated 10 to 100 percent
- based on impairment of visual acuity or field
loss, pain, rest-requirements, or episodic
incapacity, - combining additional rating of 10 percent during
continuance of active pathology. - Revised set of evaluation criteria in form of
general rating formula following diagnostic code
6009 - based either on visual impairment
- or incapacitating episodes, whichever results in
higher evaluation.
346012, Angle-closure glaucoma
- Title changed from glaucoma, congestive or
inflammatory to angle-closure glaucoma - Because this is current medical term for this
condition. -
356013, Open-angle glaucoma
- VA changed the title of diagnostic code 6013 from
glaucoma, simple, primary, noncongestive to
open-angle glaucoma - Because this is current medical term for this
condition.
366014, Malignant neoplasms (eyeball only)
- Updated title from new growth to neoplasm.
- Since not all malignant neoplasms of the eye are
- totally disabling or require treatment that is
totally disabling for a period of time - and often require no treatment other than
observation, - There are now two methods of evaluation
- For treatment confined to the eye
- For treatment not confined to the eye
376014, first method of evaluation
- If malignant neoplasm requires treatment more
extensive than to the eye - For example,
- Systemic chemotherapy
- Radiation therapy more extensive than to the eye,
or - Surgery more extensive than enucleation
- Then, a 100 percent evaluation will be assigned
386014, second method of evaluation
- If treatment is confined to the eye
- then provisions of 38 CFR 3.105(e) do not apply.
- The evaluation is based on
- Visual impairment and non visual impairment, such
as disfigurement (DC 7800) - The evaluations are combined under 38 CFR 4.25
3938 CFR 3.105(e)
- Reduction in evaluationcompensation
- Rating proposing reduction
- 60 days for presentation of additional evidence
- If additional evidence is not received within 60
days or a request for a pre determination hearing
within 30 days after the notice proposing
reduction, - Then final rating action will be taken and the
award reduced
406015, Benign neoplasms of eyeball and adnexa
- VA edited the title
- Removed 10 percent minimum evaluation as not
warranted in all cases - Evaluation based on visual impairment
- to be combined with evaluation for any non-visual
impairment, - for example, disfigurement
416017, Trachomatous conjunctivitis
- A chronic infection of the conjunctiva due to
Chlamydia trachomatis - Formerly evaluated based on impairment of visual
acuity - with a minimum evaluation of 30 percent for
active pathology - The 30 percent evaluation for active trachoma has
been retained, but - Inactive trachoma is now evaluated based on
residuals - such as visual impairment and disfigurement
426018, Chronic conjunctivitis, non trachomatous
- Other forms of conjunctivitis (pink eye)
- An inflammation of the conjunctiva (the outermost
layer of the eye and the inner surface of the
eyelids), most commonly due to an allergic
reaction or an infection(usually viral, but
sometimes bacterial - Formerly,
- It was evaluated at 10 percent for objective
symptoms - Objective symptoms changed to objective
findings - Healed changed to inactive
- because conjunctivitis may be active
intermittently without actually being healed
436019, Ptosis
- Means droopy eyelid (blepharoptosis)
- Can affect vision if covers part or all of pupil
- May be congenital or acquired
- May be cosmetic problem
- May also result in loss of superior
- (looking up) vision
44Ptosis, continued
- May be due to muscle or nerve impairment
- May be cosmetic problem
- May also result in loss of superior
- (looking up) vision
45Rating ptosis
- Formerly, (DC 6019) rated
- equivalent to visual acuity of
- 5/200 whenever the pupil was completely
obscured, or - 20/100 if pupil ½ or more obscured
- on disfigurement if less than ½ of pupil obscured
- Now, because extent to which pupil is obscured
can be difficult to determine reliably, - Evaluated based on visual impairment, or
- In absence of visual impairment, on disfigurement
466025, Disorders of the lacrimal apparatus
(epiphora)
- Epiphora is excessive tearing
- Acute type often results from
- corneal foreign bodies or allergic
conjunctivitis, and often resolves -
47Rating epiphora
- Rated under diagnostic code 6025 at 10 percent if
unilateral and 20 percent if bilateral - Example
- Unilateral epiphora due to acquired nasolacrimal
duct (tear duct)obstruction - Would be rated at 10 percent
486026, Optic neuropathy
- Disease or optic nerve injury
- Macular degeneration
- Glaucoma
- Retinitis pigmentosa
- Need field of vision measurements
496027, Cataract of any type
- Preoperative
- Evaluate based on visual impairment
- Postoperative
- If replacement lens is present (pseudophakia),
evaluate based on visual impairment - If is no replacement lens, evaluate based on
aphakia(absence of the lens of the eye) - Important change because, under the old criteria
- if veteran underwent cataract surgery with lens
implantation, - received a minimum 30 percent rating regardless
of any visual impairment following surgery
506029, Aphakia or dislocation of crystalline lens
- Definition Absence of lens of the eye
- Evaluate based on visual impairment
- And elevate resulting level of visual impairment
one step - Minimum rating (unilateral or bilateral)
- 30 percent
516034, Pterygium
- Fleshy tissue that grows over
- Formerly evaluated on loss of vision, if any
- Now evaluated on visual impairment,
disfigurement, conjunctivitis, etc.
526035, Keratoconus
- Progressive eye disease
- Cornea thins and begins to bulge into cone-like
shape - Cone shape deflects light as enters eye on way to
light-sensitive retina - Formerly minimum 30 percent evaluation when
contact lenses medically required - Minimum evaluation now deleted
- Evaluation now based on corrected visual acuity
536036, Status post corneal transplant
- New diagnosis for common condition
- Evaluation based on visual impairment
- Minimum evaluation of 10 percent if pain,
photophobia, and glare sensitivity after
transplant
546037, Pinguecula
- Yellowish, thickened lesion on the conjunctiva
near cornea - Added diagnostic code for this sometimes
disfiguring condition - Evaluated based on disfigurement
556081, Scotoma, unilateral
- A scotoma is a loss of vision in a defined area
in one or both eyes, often called a blind spot - Formerly minimum 10 percent evaluation for large
or centrally located scotoma - Changed large to affecting at least ¼ of
visual field - Evaluation otherwise based on visual impairment
566090,Diplopia
- Diplopia double vision
- If disease or injury involves
- Extrinsic muscles of the eye, or
- Motor nerve supplying these muscles, then
- Exam should include measurement of muscle
function
576091, Symblepharon
- Adhesion of one or both eyelids to the eyeball
- Formerly rated under diagnostic code 6090
(diplopia) - Is evaluated based on
- visual impairment
- lagophthalmos (DC 6022), inability to close or
poor closure, of upper eyelid - disfigurement, etc.
- May also result in other types of impairments
58Retinitis pigmentosa
- Retinitis pigmentosa
- Not changed, but is a very important topic
- Hereditary or congenital
- May grant SC under certain circumstances (see
next few slides) - No diagnostic code for retinitis pigmentosa
- Evaluation based on visual impairment
- Often loss of peripheral visual fields, but may
also be loss of central visual acuity and
widespread - field loss
59Presumption of soundness
- Veteran will be considered to have been in sound
condition when examined, accepted and enrolled
for service - Except as to defects, infirmities, or disorders
noted at entrance into service, or - Evidence clearly shows that condition existed
before and was not aggravated by service
60 VAOPGCPREC 11-99
- Â Service connection may be granted for retinitis
pigmentosa even though it existed prior to
service if there was in-service aggravation
61VAOPGPREC 82-90
- A defect differs from a disease
- A defect is more or less stationary in nature
and - A disease is capable of improving or
deteriorating.
62 Quirin v. Shinseki
- BVA must properly apply VAOPG 82-90 in
determining whether or not a condition is a
disease or defect - Worsening any change at all might demonstrate
condition is a disease - Â Presumption of soundness does not apply to
congenital defects, - but must be applied if condition determined to be
a congenital disease.
63Ancillary benefits
- 1. Auto allowance
- 2. Specially Adapted Housing
- 3. Special Home Adaptation Grant
- A specific claim is required, however,
- It becomes an inferred issue when the veteran
meets the schedular requirements and VA can grant
the benefit
64Auto allowance
- A certificate of eligibility for financial
assistance in the purchase of one automobile or
other conveyance in an amount not exceeding the
amount specified in 38 U.S.C. 3902 (including all
State, local, and other taxes where such are
applicable and included in the purchase price)
and of basic entitlement to necessary adaptive
equipment - Payable where best corrected central visual
acuity no better than 20/200 in better eye (at
least 70 percent evaluation using DC 6066), or - Visual field no better than 20 degrees in better
eye - (at least 50 percent evaluation under DC
6080) - 38 CFR 3.808(b)(1)(iii)
65Specially adapted housing
- A certificate of eligibility for assistance in
acquiring specially adapted housing under 38
U.S.C. 2101 - Not payable for blindness alone, but is payable
for - Blindness in both eyes no better than light
perception (LPO) - Plus anatomical loss or loss of use of one lower
extremity - 38 CFRÂ 3.809Â Â Â Specially adapted housing under 38
U.S.C. 2101(a).
66Special home adaptation grant
- A certificate of eligibility for assistance in
acquiring necessary special home adaptations, or,
on or after October 28, 1986, for assistance in
acquiring a residence already adapted with
necessary special features, under 38 U.S.C.
2101(b) - Blindness of both eyes with visual acuity of
5/200 or less, or - Bilateral concentric contraction of visual field
to 5 degrees or less under DC 6080 (visual field
defects) - 38 CFR 3.809(a)
67Summary of what we have learned today
- The VA Rating Schedule for the Eyes changed
effective 12-10-08 - Reorganized into 4 sections
- 1. Visual impairment (38 CFR 4.75)
- 2. Visual acuity (38 CFR 4.76)
- 3. Visual fields (38 CFR 4.77)
- 4. Muscle function (38 CFR 4.78)
- Certain eye disabilities will be rated either on
- Visual impairment or
- Incapacitating episodes
68