Chapter Nine - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Chapter Nine

Description:

Percentages are a common way to use numbers to denote probability. ... 05, then we decide that chance is still a possible explanation for the finding, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:10
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: wpsPre
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Chapter Nine


1
Chapter Nine
  • Probability, the Normal Curve, and Sampling

PowerPoint Presentation created by Dr. Susan R.
BurnsMorningside College
2
The Nature and Logic of Probability
  • Probability is used to help determine the
    likelihood that a given outcome from out
    experiment was probable or not. Anytime we use a
    sample and not a population, we have to use
    statistics and probability to draw conclusions.
  • Subjective Probability is used in estimations
    of probability, not using numbers.
  • Odds when you hear about the odds of something
    taking place using numbers that is a type of
    probability.
  • Percentages are a common way to use numbers to
    denote probability.
  • Proportions also use numbers to indicate
    probability.

3
The Nature and Logic of Probability
  • The reason probability is so important for
    researchers is that inferential statistics tests
    allow us to determine the probability that our
    results came about by chance.
  • The basic premise behind inferential statistics
    is that we assume there is no difference between
    the groups in our experiment (a.k.a., the null
    hypothesis).

4
The Nature and Logic of Probability
  • With two groups the null hypothesis looks like
    this
  • M1 M2
  • In other words, the mean of group 1 is equal to
    the mean of group 2.
  • The second hypothesis we test in inferential
    statistics is the alternative (or experimental)
    hypothesis. Written as
  • M1 ? M2
  • The alternative hypothesis is typically the one
    the experimenter hopes to support in the
    experiment. To avoid bias, we start off assuming
    the null hypothesis and let the data and
    statistical test demonstrate otherwise.

5
The Nature and Logic of Probability
  • If the differences between the groups is small or
    zero, our inferential statistic would also be
    small.
  • Inferential statistics with small values occur
    frequently by chance.
  • If it occurs by chance, then we say that the
    difference between our groups is not significant
    and conclude that our IV did not affect the DV,
    and thus accept the null hypothesis.
  • If the difference between the groups is large,
    our inferential statistic would be large.
  • Inferential statistics with large values occur
    rarely by chance, and thus, we would say that the
    difference between our group sis significant and
    conclude that some factor other than chance (our
    IV) is at work (affecting the DV).

6
The Nature and Logic of Probability
  • What is considered chance in psychology?
  • Typically psychologists say that any event that
    occurs by chance 5 times or fewer in 100
    occasions is a rare event.
  • Thus, the common phrase mentioned in publications
    is .05 level of significance.
  • Meaning, that a result is considered significant
    if it would occur 5 or fewer times by chance in
    100 replications of the experiment when the null
    hypothesis is actually true.

7
A Conceptual Statistical Note
  • Although with our hypotheses we discuss
    comparisons of sample means, researchers and
    statisticians want to compare the two population
    means represented by the two groups so they can
    draw conclusions about the effects of the IV in
    the populations of interest.
  • Thus, the conceptual null hypothesis is µ1 µ2,
    and the conceptual alternative hypothesis is µ1 ?
    µ2.
  • Because we rarely can test populations, we resort
    to sampling from those populations and end up
    comparing sample means.
  • Although we use sample means in our formulas, the
    statistical null and alternative hypotheses use
    population means.

8
Probability and the Normal Curve
  • The shape and spread of the normal distribution
    never changes, so the probability associated with
    a z score of a certain size will never change.
  • Thus, to use the normal distribution to find
    probabilities, you can use the z score formula
  • This concept is true for statistical tests in
    general. We use probabilities from statistical
    tests because they are objective, which allows us
    to avoid making subjective guesses about the
    outcomes of our research.

9
Probability and Decisions
  • The process of using probability to make
    decisions concerning experimental findings is
    fairly straightforward
  • We use a statistical test to find the probability
    of a given event occurring by chance.
  • We then compare that probability to the critical
    probability for making our decisions the .05
    level of significance.
  • If the probability of the statistic occurring by
    chance is above .05, then we decide that chance
    is still a possible explanation for the finding,
    and thus are uncertain about the outcome and
    conclude that is possible that the finding is due
    to chance (i.e., accept the null hypothesis).
  • If the probability of our statistic test is less
    than .05, we believe that chance is not a likely
    explanation for the finding. Thus, the null
    hypothesis is rejected and the alternative
    hypothesis is accepted.

10
Comparing a Sample to a Population The
One-Sample t Test
  • The One-Sample t test in some instances we
    would like to compare a sample mean to a mean of
    a population.
  • To do such a problem, rather than using the
    normal distribution as we did for the z scores,
    we need to use a new statistical distribution
    the t distribution.
  • The t distribution is similar to the normal
    shape, but the t distribution is used for smaller
    samples than we usually would have for the normal
    distribution.
  • The t distribution is flatter in the middle and
    higher on the tails compared to the normal
    distribution.

11
Comparing a Sample to a Population The
One-Sample t Test
  • Being higher on the tails is a concern because
    the critical region for a statistical test (the
    .05 level) is located in the tails of the curves.
  • Using a normal distribution for small samples can
    give us misleading probabilities and, therefore,
    result in misleading conclusions.

12
Comparing a Sample to a Population The
One-Sample t Test
  • Another characteristic of the t distribution that
    is different from the normal distribution is that
    the t distribution does not retain its shape it
    changes shape based on the size of the sample.
  • The t distribution changes shape based on its
    number of degrees of freedom (i.e., the ability
    of a number in a given set to assume any value).
  • This ability is influence by the restrictions
    imposed on the set of numbers. For every
    restriction, one number is determine and must
    assume a fixed or specified value.

13
Comparing a Sample to a Population The
One-Sample t Test
  • When examining a critical value table, you will
    see that the values in the df column are
    continuous until 30, at which point they jump by
    larger and larger increments.
  • Should your value for df not appear in the table,
    you should bias the test against yourself.
  • That is, never give yourself degrees of freedom
    that you dont actually have.
  • This decreases the chance of you making a
    statistical error. You will also notice in the
    critical value table, that there are more
    probabilities listed than just the .05 level.
  • Having additional levels in the table allows us
    to get a better idea of the probability of chance
    of our results.

14
Comparing a Sample to a Population The
One-Sample t Test
  • The statistical formula for the one-sample t test
    is
  • Marginal significance is often labeled by the
    area of probability between .05 and .10.
  • The conclusion is that your results were almost
    significant, but not quite.
  • Typically, researchers will discuss results that
    are marginally significant in their articles.
    However, they will likely use hedge words
    (e.g., these results may indicate, rather than
    these results indicate) in their discussions.

15
One-Tailed and Two-Tailed Tests of Significance
  • You can state your experimental hypotheses in a
    direction or a non-directional manner.
  • Non-directional would look like this M1 ? M2
  • Directional would look like this either M1 lt M2
    or M1 gt M2
  • A one-tailed t test evaluates the probability of
    an outcome in only one direction (greater than or
    less than a directional hypothesis), whereas the
    two-tailed t test evaluates the outcome in both
    possible directions (a non-directional
    hypothesis).
  • For non-directional hypotheses, the probability
    of the result occurring by chance alone is split
    in half and distributed equally in the two tails
    of the distribution. Although the test is
    calculated the same, you would consult different
    columns in the t table.
  • Because the probability is not split for the
    one-tailed test, the critical value is lower, and
    thus it is easier to find a significant result.
    The main reason researchers dont use the
    one-tailed test is because they dont exactly
    know how an experiment will turn out, and thus
    are cautious in their predictions.

16
When Statistics Go Astray Type I and Type II
Errors
  • When we conduct research and use probability in
    determining significance of our tests, there is
    always the possibility that your experiment
    represents one of those 5 times in 100 when the
    results did occur by chance.
  • Type I Error occurs when the null hypothesis is
    true and you make an error in accepting the
    experimental hypothesis. The experimenter
    directly controls the probability of making a
    Type I error by setting the significance level
    (e.g., switching from .05 to .01)
  • Type II error occurs when we reject a true
    experimental hypothesis. This type of errors is
    not under the control of the researcher. We can
    cut down on Type II errors by implementing
    techniques that will cause our groups to differ
    as much as possible (e.g., using a strong IV and
    larger groups of participants are two techniques
    that can help avoid Type II errors).

17
When Statistics Go Astray Type I and Type II
Errors
18
Sampling Considerations and Basic Research
Strategies
  • Sampling
  • When we select a group to represent the
    population we can that group a sample.
  • Techniques you can use to obtain a sample
    include
  • Random sampling - ensures that every member of
    the population has an equal chance of being
    selected for inclusion in the sample. Thus giving
    us a representative sample of the population.
  • Random sampling without replacement occurs when
    a participant is not eligible to be chosen again
    once youve selected him/her. This is the
    technique psychologists prefer.
  • Random sampling with replacement occurs when
    you return a participant to the population and
    have him/her eligible for selection again.

19
Sampling Considerations and Basic Research
Strategies
  • Sampling
  • To increase representativeness of our sample, we
    can increase a larger sample size. Generally, the
    larger the sample, the more representative it
    will be of the population.
  • Stratified random sampling is another technique
    we can use to increase representativeness it
    involves dividing the population into
    subpopulations or strata and then drawing a
    random sample from one or more of these strata.

20
Basic Research Strategies
  • Single-strata approach seeks to acquire data
    from a single, specified segment of the
    population.
  • Cross-sectional research involves the
    comparison of two or more groups of participants
    during the same time, rather limited, time span.
  • Longitudinal research involves obtaining a
    random sample from the population of interest
    then this sample (or cohort) would be contacted
    periodically over an extended period of time to
    determine if any changes had occurred during the
    time of interest.

21
Basic Research Strategies
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com