CES Conference 2003 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

CES Conference 2003

Description:

Jay Chalke, Public Guardian & Trustee of British Columbia ... Foreshadowing. CCAF FCVI. 20. Reporting. Start-up phase. In process. Fundamentals in place ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:17
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: mikew150
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CES Conference 2003


1
CES Conference 2003
  • In the Publics Best Interest
  • Evaluation,
  • Accountability, and
  • Transparency

2
Panel Discussion Public Performance Reporting
Principles to Practice
  • Jay Chalke, Public Guardian Trustee of British
    Columbia
  • Errol Price, Senior Principal, Office of the
    Auditor General of British Columbia
  • Michael Weir, Research Associate CCAF

3
Discussion Agenda
  • Objectives,
  • Introduce Reporting Principles
  • Share lessons learned from using Reporting
    Principles in
  • Development, finalization of statutory report
  • Provision of audit assurance on same
  • Structure
  • Presentation
  • Discussion
  • Principles
  • Application
  • Moving forward

4
CCAFs Reporting Principles
  • A key element of Multi-Faceted Program to
  • Improve returns
  • Address human dimensions of reporting
  • Reflects the input and perspectives of three key
    communities
  • Auditors
  • Managers
  • Legislators

5
Reporting Principles
  • CCAF recommendations an integrated set of
    Principles
  • Support for disciplined reporting judgments
  • Influence on next generation of performance
    reporting
  • a common reference point for
  • reporting guidance
  • audit criteria and
  • (ultimately) standards.

6
Putting Principles into Practice
  • Realization requires
  • Integrated, holistic approach
  • Shared Leadership
  • By Auditors, Executives, Legislators, Opinion
    leaders, Standard setters
  • In respect of Relationships Incentives
    Capacity to use Agreeing reasonable
    expectations Continuous learning

7
A Real Life Case Study
  • Public Guardian Trustee
  • Office of the Auditor General

8
PGT Overview
  • Clients
  • Children
  • Incapable adults
  • Deceased Estates
  • Dimensions
  • 210 employees
  • gt18 operating budget
  • gt 600 million in trust assets
  • gt 23,000 clients

9
PGT Role
  • Forty different specific services of two general
    types
  • Fiduciary property management roles
  • Managing childrens trusts
  • Managing financial affairs of incapable adults
  • Securing assets and distributing to heirs of
    deceased persons
  • Protective and substitute decision making roles
  • Monitor and investigate private fiduciaries where
    beneficiaries under legal disability
  • Health care decisions

10
Context for PGTs New Statutory Transparency
Regime
  • Historically PGT had a low profile, was
    under-resourced and largely ignored by government
    and public
  • Resulted in inadequate staffing, major backlogs
    and poor reputation
  • Office was poorly understood and considered
    secretive
  • Clients largely powerless and without ability to
    take business elsewhere

11
The New Transparency Regime
Part 3 of the 1993 Public Guardian and Trustee
Act enacted to change profile and provide public
assurance that societys most vulnerable are
properly cared for
  • Act proclaimed in 2000
  • Contains prospective and retrospective aspects of
    transparency and accountability.
  • Rolling 3 year Service Delivery Plans which
    include goals, objective and performance targets
  • Annual self-assessment of performance
  • A unique requirement in BC law - the Auditor
    General must comment on the PGTs performance
    report
  • This third party assurance is included in the
    public Annual Report

12
Office of the Auditor General
  • Primary goal that the Legislative Assembly and
    the public receive the best information possible
    for assessing the performance of government and
    its organizations

13
Context for OAG Involvement
  • Support managing for and accountability for
    results
  • Actively promoted in recent years
  • Supported CCAF-FCVI work
  • Welcome legislated requirement

14
OAG Role re PGT
  • Report on PGT report
  • Unique legislation in BC
  • Allows assurance without full audit opinion
  • Big challenge credibility vs. support

15
Implementing Part 3 of the Public Guardian and
Trustee Act
  • Challenges
  • Little capacity for research, strategic planning
    and related activities
  • 0 to 60 in one year (no corporate history,
    limited MIS, little internal awareness)
  • No external comparators
  • Development of 3 Year Plan
  • External consultation
  • All staff input
  • Senior management finalization
  • In Year Managing for Results
  • Strict tracking and reporting structure developed
  • Quarterly Executive Committee review
  • Final quarter focus on marginal targets
  • Retrospective Reporting
  • Used CCAF principles for reporting
  • Looked for best of other performance reports
  • Worked cooperatively with Auditor General on
    report design

16
Criteria for Choosing Audit Approach
  1. Enhance value of information
  2. Defensible standards and methodology
  3. Establish assurance as value-added
  4. Reasonable stresses on OAG capacity

17
Learning Model What It Is
  • Foundation in CCAF reporting principles
  • Focus on stage of development
  • Objective assessment of where PGT is, not where
    it should be
  • 5025 assurance engagement

18
Matrix for Assessing Report
  • Elaboration on each principle
  • Four stages of development
  • Start-up
  • In Process
  • Fundamentals In Place
  • Fully Incorporated

19
Conduct of Engagement
  • 3 Phases
  • 3 member team
  • Primarily a desk review
  • Foreshadowing

20
Reporting
Reporting Principles
7 Key Reportingjudgments
2 Few Critical Aspects
6 ComparativeInformation
5 Capacity, Risk Other Factors
4 Linking Resources Results
3 Linking Goals Achievements
1 Reliable, Fair Timely
STAGE OF DEVELOPMENT
Fully incorporated
Fundamentals in place
In process
Start-up phase
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
21
Lessons from PGTs Year One of Performance
Reporting
  • Impact of Performance Targets
  • Corporate performance culture well underway
  • Sharpened sense of mission
  • Have a baseline and can start to learn from our
    own performance
  • Ongoing Challenges
  • Lack of comparators historic, private sector,
    other jurisdictions
  • Incremental project nature of change in public
    sector versus value of consistency in year over
    year reporting
  • Attribution of service to outcomes given small
    size and multi-factor environment

22
Lessons from PGTs Year One of Performance
Reporting (Contd)
  • Benefits
  • Assisted with Core Services Review
  • Provides evidence to counteract anecdotal and
    out-dated reputation
  • Allows government to more clearly see what
    services are being delivered and at what standard
  • Clarifies accountability for, and implications,
    of resource related decisions
  • Auditor General involvement adds rigour

23
Discussion Agenda
  • The Principles Themselves
  • Application -- the human dimensions of reporting
  • Next steps

24
Reporting Principles
  • For More Information And Copies of Reports,
    Contact
  • CCAF http//www.ccaf-fcvi.com
  • Public Guardian and Trustee of British Columbia
    http//www.trustee.bc.ca/
  • Office of the Auditor General of British Columbia
    http//www.bcauditor.com
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com