Introspection - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

Introspection

Description:

Rabbit-Duck. Thought psychology. Wurzburger school. Germany 1890 till 1930 ... I doubt if any one psychologist can draw up a set of statements describing what ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1291
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: louis6
Category:
Tags: draw | how | introspection | rabbit | to

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Introspection


1
Introspection
  • Do we have access to our mind?

2
Descartes ideas on conscious mind
  • Characteristics of the mind
  • 1. Our entire mental life is conscious.
  • 2. Our consciousness is transparent to itself.
  • 3. Our consciousness is a unified entity.
  • 4. Our consciousness is responsible for our free
    actions.
  • Yesterday especially about 3
  • Mind of split brain patient not a unity
  • Today mostly about 2 and 4
  • Combination makes introspection very interesting
  • Mind knows itself, and minds acts upon this
    knowledge
  • Introspection gives insight into nature of mind
    and causes of behavior

3
Introspection and ideas
  • Back to the Scientific revolution
  • Aristotle
  • Access to the world
  • The world is as we experience it
  • Nothing between us and the world
  • We are always in the world
  • We experience the world as it is
  • We experience the mind as it is

4
The world as mystery
  • The real world is hidden
  • Is different from what we observe
  • Mechanistic world view
  • Motion, mass, size, form
  • Mathematical description of the world
  • Separating objective and subjective
    characteristics

5
No direct access to the world
  • Primary qualities are part of the world
  • Secondary qualities are part of the mind
  • Rationalism and Empiricism
  • Both united on this
  • Only partial correspondence between world and
    mind
  • What do we have knowledge of
  • Our sense experiences empiricism
  • Our thoughts rationalism
  • The world becomes sensations and thoughts

6
Ideas
  • We only know about perceptions/ sense experiences
  • Locke
  • We only know about thoughts
  • Descartes
  • Cartesian theatre (Dennet)
  • The subject looks at the content of mind
  • Homunculus
  • Introspection as the eye inside
  • Mind as spatial metaphor we look around in the
    space of our mind and see images of reality

7
Kant
  • Strengthening of idealist tendencies
  • Mind imposes order on the universe
  • We cannot know the world as it is, only as it
    appears to us through perceptual schemata and
    categories
  • Space, time, quantity, quality, cause
  • Transcendental idealism
  • No scientific knowledge possible of mind
  • Introspection changes the process
  • You cannot think and think about thinking at the
    same time
  • Challenge for psychology Wundt

8
Wundt and introspection
  • Physiological psychology
  • Introspection under control of experimental
    stimuli
  • We can both experience and report on experience
    if there is a
  • Link between stimulus and report
  • Stimulus error
  • Mental atomism
  • Simple mental functions

9
Limit to introspection
  • Thinking, and thinking about the same impossible
  • Hence
  • Higher functions cannot be studied experimentally
  • Must be studies in the products of the mind
  • Art, culture, philosophy, literature
  • Voelkerpsychologie cultural anthropology
  • Mental atomism weak spot
  • Assumes synthesis of analytic parts, but
  • Holism of perception and thought

10
Introspection after Wundt
  • Gestalt psychology
  • Introspection to find mental atoms is nonsense
  • Unity of perception
  • Active, but non-conscious processes
  • Continuation
  • Rabbit-Duck

11
Thought psychology
  • Wurzburger school
  • Germany 1890 till 1930
  • Kuelpe, Selz
  • Introspection on complex tasks
  • Girgensohn
  • Assignment Right to vote Two main kinds.
  • Answer after less than 6 seconds
  • direct and indirect
  • Then retrospective analysis of thought process

12
Analysis
  • Direct appeal on memory. Seeking for something
    well known is experienced completely different
    from cases where I have to look for an answer
    independently. In this case immediately I fathom
    that I know something, and I try to establish
    what I know. But also knowledge about the
    controversies on the right to vote during the
    last parliamentary session in Prussia shimmered
    before my mind. Apart from a vague orientation on
    this, there was something else present in my
    consciousness that to me seems to me to represent
    the object of this orientation. This, which
    represents the object of the orientation, has
    nothing to do with moods or feelings. Of this I
    am subjectively sure. There were no images
    present during this complete process, and as far
    as I can remember, there were also no words
    involved up till that moment

13
Decline of introspection
  • Such research did introspection no good
  • Rise of behaviorism
  • Experimental research into behavior is object of
    psychology
  • Introspection only leads to controversy and
    dissidence
  • James Watson

14
James Watson
  • There is no longer any guarantee that we all mean
    the same thing when we use the terms now current
    in psychology. I doubt if any one psychologist
    can draw up a set of statements describing what
    he means by sensation which will be agreed to by
    three other psychologists.
  • I firmly believe that two hundred years from now,
    unless the introspective method is discarded,
    psychology will still be divided on the question
    as to whether auditory sensations have the
    quality of 'extension', whether intensity is an
    attribute which can be applied to color, whether
    there is a difference in 'texture' between image
    and sensation and upon many hundreds of others of
    like character.

15
Modern cognitive psychology
  • Resurfacing of introspection
  • Attention as a topic
  • Thinking and problem solving
  • Introspection widely used and often very fruitful
  • Rotation problem good example
  • However also grave dangers
  • Research into problem solving
  • Nine point problem
  • Go into more detail

16
The problem
  • Connect all the dots with maximum of 4 lines
  • Difficulty is you have to go outside the matrix
    of points
  • Most people find solution but may take time

17
The experiment
  • Four groups receive sheet with specimens of
    problem
  • Different instructions for the groups
  • 1. No instruction. Just solve
  • 2. No instruction, but afterwards asked how they
    solved the problem
  • 3. Notified before that afterwards they will be
    asked to retrospectively report how they solved
    the problem
  • 4. Instructed to think aloud while solving the
    problem
  • Results
  • On 3 dimensions
  • Time used to solve problem
  • Number of specimens used on sheet
  • Number of words used in explanation

18
Group 1
Time to solve Number of specimens Number of
words Note only relative position!
  • Low number of specimens used
  • Relative brief time to solve
  • Random strategy
  • Trial and error

19
Group 2
Time to solve Number of specimens Number of words
  • 1 and 2 comparable on time and number of
    specimens used
  • Asking for description of thought process
    experienced as unfair
  • No relation between retrospection and specimen
    sheet

20
Group 3
Time to solve Number of specimens Number of words
  • Increase in time used
  • Lower nr of specimens
  • More words than group 2
  • Clear relation between retrospection and use of
    specimen sheet
  • Work more systematically than gr. 1 and 2

21
Group 4
Time to solve Number of specimens Number of words
  • Strong increase on all dimensions more time,
    more specimens and more words
  • Very systematic style of working
  • No trial and error but methodical strategy to
    solve problem

22
Conclusions
  • If we solve a problem we are not conscious on how
    we do it
  • see group 2, angry when asked
  • If we know we must give an account of our thought
    processes we think not only slower but also
    differently
  • see relation between sheet and retrospection
  • none in group 1 2, strong in group 3 4
  • The instrument of introspection influences the
    object we want to measure
  • Introsepction is a big thermometer used to
    measure the temperature of a small volume of
    fluid
  • Therefore introspection is a dangerous tool in
    psychological research

23
Conclusions continued
  • Our mind is not transparent to introspection
  • Introspection creates another mind, not identical
    to the mind without introspection
  • But things are even worse
  • We often have no access to why we do things
  • Introspection does not lay bare the causes of
    behavior
  • Nisbett and Wilson on attribution

24
Helping behavior
  • Bystander phenomenon
  • Kitty Genovese
  • The more people witness an emergency, the less
    likely it is that anyone will help
  • Presence of others is cause of apathy among
    witnesses
  • Interpretations
  • Generalized knowledge
  • Nobody helps so it is no emergency
  • Why me?

25
Robust phenomenon
  • On introspection people will never mention this
    true cause of apathy in an emergency
  • They will cite all sorts of other reasons, prior
    theories they have
  • Introspection will not give the true cause of
    action
  • Mind is not transparent

26
Access to the mind?
  • Do we have access to our mind?
  • Do we know how we do things?
  • Language
  • I can speak, but do I know how I do it?
  • Man is both master and slave
  • Sometimes we accept slave status overwhelmed by
    emotions
  • Not for thinking
  • Cannot say Overwhelmed by thoughts
  • Are we the victims or suspects of our actions?
  • A victim is not responsible
  • A suspect is
  • Image of man in psychology
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com