Transnational Families and Remittances: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 93
About This Presentation
Title:

Transnational Families and Remittances:

Description:

Map of the Presentation: 1. Background. 2. Model of Household Remittance Flows. 3. The Data ... Guatemala. Jamaica. Haiti. Honduras. Guyana. Goals of the ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:92
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 94
Provided by: AlanSi1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Transnational Families and Remittances:


1
Transnational Families and Remittances
  • A Study of Haitian and Jamaican Origin
    Communities in Canada
  • Alan Simmons, Dwaine Plaza
  • Victor Piché

2
  • Preliminary findings!
  • Do not cite, quote or reproduce without
    permission from the authors!

3
Map of the Presentation
4
Map of the Presentation
  • 1. Background
  • 2. Model of Household Remittance Flows
  • 3. The Data
  • 4. Main Findings
  • 5. Policy Issues and Conclusions

5
Map of the Presentation
  • 1. Background
  • 2. Model of Household Remittance Flows
  • 3. The Data
  • 4. Main Findings
  • 5. Policy Issues and Conclusions

6
Map of the Presentation
  • 1. Background
  • 2. Model of Household Remittance Flows
  • 3. The Data
  • 4. Main Findings
  • 5. Policy Issues and Conclusions

7
Map of the Presentation
  • 1. Background
  • 2. Model of Household Remittance Flows
  • 3. The Data
  • 4. Main Findings
  • 5. Policy Issues and Conclusions

8
Map of the Presentation
  • 1. Background
  • 2. Model of Household Remittance Flows
  • 3. The Data
  • 4. Main Findings
  • 5. Policy Issues and Conclusions

9
Part 1. Background
10
Part 1. Background
  • Immigration Trends
  • Total Remittance Flows
  • Goals of the Research

11
Part 1. Background
  • Immigration Trends
  • Total Remittance Flows
  • Goals of the Research

12
Part 1. Background
  • Immigration Trends
  • Total Remittance Flows
  • Goals of the Research

13
Jamaicans
Haitians
Salvadorians
Guatemalans
Mexicans
14
El Salvador
Guatemala
Jamaica
Haiti
Honduras
Guyana
15
Goals of the Research
16
Goals of the Research
  • Gather basic facts
  • How much is remitted?
  • To whom?
  • Through what channels?
  • With what transfer costs?
  • Assess policy implications
  • For financial institutions
  • For development programs

17
Goals of the Research
  • Gather basic facts
  • How much is remitted?
  • To whom?
  • Through what channels?
  • With what transfer costs?
  • Assess policy implications
  • For financial institutions
  • For development programs

18
Goals of the Research
  • Gather basic facts
  • How much is remitted?
  • To whom?
  • Through what channels?
  • With what transfer costs?
  • Assess policy implications
  • For financial institutions
  • For development programs

19
Goals of the Research
  • Gather basic facts
  • How much is remitted?
  • To whom?
  • Through what channels?
  • With what transfer costs?
  • Assess policy implications
  • For financial institutions
  • For development programs

20
Goals of the Research
  • Gather basic facts
  • How much is remitted?
  • To whom?
  • Through what channels?
  • With what transfer costs?
  • Assess policy implications
  • For financial institutions
  • For development programs

21
Goals of the Research
  • Gather basic facts
  • How much is remitted?
  • To whom?
  • Through what channels?
  • With what transfer costs?
  • Assess policy implications
  • For financial institutions
  • For development programs

22
Goals of the Research
  • Gather basic facts
  • How much is remitted?
  • To whom?
  • Through what channels?
  • With what transfer costs?
  • Assess policy implications
  • For financial institutions
  • For development programs

23
Goals of the Research
  • Gather basic facts
  • How much is remitted?
  • To whom?
  • Through what channels?
  • With what transfer costs?
  • Assess policy implications
  • For financial institutions
  • For development programs

24
Part 2. The Model
25
Part 2. The Model
Resources Motivations
26
Part 2. The Model
Resources Motivations
Channels and Barriers
Amounts Remitted
27
Part 2. The Model
Resources Motivations
Channels and Barriers
Amounts Remitted
Outcomes for Recipients
28
Part 2. The Model
Resources Motivations
Outcomes for Senders
Channels and Barriers
Amounts Remitted
Outcomes for Recipients
29
Part 3. The Data
  • Survey design
  • Questionnaire content

30
Survey Design
  • Criterion sample of individuals

31
Survey Design
  • Criterion sample of individuals
  • Born in Haiti (Montreal) and Jamaica (Toronto)
  • Eighteen years of age or over
  • Living in Canada for at least one year
  • Knowledgeable of household expenditures
  • Both males and females, at all income and
    schooling levels
  • In different parts of each city

32
Survey Design
  • Criterion sample of individuals
  • Born in Haiti (Montreal) and Jamaica (Toronto)
  • Eighteen years of age or over
  • Living in Canada for at least one year
  • Knowledgeable of household expenditures
  • Both males and females, at all income and
    schooling levels
  • In different parts of each city

33
Survey Design
  • Criterion sample of individuals
  • Born in Haiti (Montreal) and Jamaica (Toronto)
  • Eighteen years of age or over
  • Living in Canada for at least one year
  • Knowledgeable of household expenditures
  • Both males and females, at all income and
    schooling levels
  • In different parts of each city

34
Survey Design
  • Criterion sample of individuals
  • Born in Haiti (Montreal) and Jamaica (Toronto)
  • Eighteen years of age or over
  • Living in Canada for at least one year
  • Knowledgeable of household expenditures
  • Both males and females, at all income and
    schooling levels
  • In different parts of each city

35
Survey Design
  • Criterion sample of individuals
  • Born in Haiti (Montreal) and Jamaica (Toronto)
  • Eighteen years of age or over
  • Living in Canada for at least one year
  • Knowledgeable of household expenditures
  • Both males and females, at all income and
    schooling levels
  • In different parts of each city

36
Survey Design
  • Criterion sample of individuals
  • Born in Haiti (Montreal) and Jamaica (Toronto)
  • Eighteen years of age or over
  • Living in Canada for at least one year
  • Knowledgeable of household expenditures
  • Both males and females, at all income and
    schooling levels
  • In different parts of each city

37
Questionnaire
38
Questionnaire
  • Individual level
  • Household level
  • Monetary remittances
  • Goods (via barrel, etc.)
  • Collective-institutional transfers
  • Measures of transnational links

39
Questionnaire
  • Individual level
  • Household level
  • Monetary remittances
  • Goods (via barrel, etc.)
  • Collective-institutional transfers
  • Measures of transnational links

40
Questionnaire
  • Individual level
  • Household level
  • Monetary remittances
  • Goods (via barrel, etc.)
  • Collective-institutional transfers
  • Measures of transnational links

41
Questionnaire
  • Individual level
  • Household level
  • Monetary remittances
  • Goods (via barrel, etc.)
  • Collective-institutional transfers
  • Measures of transnational links

42
Questionnaire
  • Individual level
  • Household level
  • Monetary remittances
  • Goods (via barrel, etc.)
  • Collective-institutional transfers
  • Measures of transnational links

43
Questionnaire
  • Individual level
  • Household level
  • Monetary remittances
  • Goods (via barrel, etc.)
  • Collective-institutional transfers
  • Measures of transnational links

44
Part 4. Findings
45
Part 4. Findings
  • How much is sent?
  • To whom?
  • Through what channels?
  • With what transfer costs?

46
Part 4. Findings
  • How much is sent?
  • To whom?
  • Through what channels?
  • With what transfer costs?

47
Part 4. Findings
  • How much is sent?
  • To whom?
  • Through what channels?
  • With what transfer costs?

48
Part 4. Findings
  • How much is sent?
  • To whom?
  • Through what channels?
  • With what transfer costs?

49
Table 1. Transfers
50
Table 1. Transfers
51
Table 1. Transfers
52
Table 1. Transfers
53
Table 1. Transfers
54
Table 1. Transfers
55
Table 1. Transfers
56
Table 1. Transfers
57
Table 2. Main Recipients (percents)
58
Table 2. Main Recipients (percents)
59
Table 2. Main Recipients (percents)
60
Table 3. Money Transfer Channels
61
Table 3. Money Transfer Channels
62
Table 3. Money Transfer Channels
63
Table 3. Money Transfer Channels
64
Table 3. Money Transfer Channels
65
Table 4. Illustrative Transfer Fees
66
Table 4. Illustrative Transfer Fees
67
Table 4. Illustrative Transfer Fees
68
Part 5. Policy Issues
  • Who sends remittances?
  • Are senders more transnational?
  • How much is transferred through
    collective/institutionalized projects?
  • How do generation and income levels affect
    remittance practices?
  • Etc.

69
Table 5. Who sends remittances?

70
Table 5. Who sends remittances?

71
Table 5. Who sends remittances?

72
Table 5. Who sends remittances?

73
Chart 4. Total Household Remittances in 2004 by
Household Income Category
Jamaicans
Haitians
Household Income
74
Table 6. Transnational Family Contacts
75
Table 6. Transnational Family Contacts
76
Table 6. Transnational Family Contacts
77
Chart 3. Mean Remittances Sent Controlling for
Telephone Contact
Jamaicans
Haitians
78
Table 7. Involvement in Transnational Projects
79
Table 7. Involvement in Transnational Projects
80
Table 7. Involvement in Transnational Projects
81
Preliminary Conclusions
  • Reduce transfer fees
  • Expand financial services
  • Tax exemption for remitters
  • Promote TN family links
  • Strengthen TN community links
  • Be sensitive to gender, age and social class
    background of senders

82
Preliminary Conclusions
  • Reduce transfer fees
  • Expand financial services
  • Tax exemption for remitters
  • Promote TN family links
  • Strengthen TN community links
  • Be sensitive to gender, age and social class
    background of senders

83
Preliminary Conclusions
  • Reduce transfer fees
  • Expand financial services
  • Tax exemption for remitters
  • Promote TN family links
  • Strengthen TN community links
  • Be sensitive to gender, age and social class
    background of senders

84
Preliminary Conclusions
  • Reduce transfer fees
  • Expand financial services
  • Tax exemption for remitters
  • Promote TN family links
  • Strengthen TN community links
  • Be sensitive to gender, age and social class
    background of senders

85
Preliminary Conclusions
  • Reduce transfer fees
  • Expand financial services
  • Tax exemption for remitters
  • Promote TN family links
  • Strengthen TN community links
  • Be sensitive to gender, age and social class
    background of senders

86
Preliminary Conclusions
  • Reduce transfer fees
  • Expand financial services
  • Tax exemption for remitters
  • Promote TN family links
  • Strengthen TN community links
  • Be sensitive to gender, age and social class
    background of senders

87
Preliminary Conclusions
  • Reduce transfer fees
  • Expand financial services
  • Tax exemption for remitters
  • Promote TN family links
  • Strengthen TN community links
  • Be sensitive to gender, age and social class
    background of senders

88
  • END

89
Acknowledgements
  • Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA),
    for project financing
  • Centre for Research on Latin America and the
    Caribbean, York University, for institutional
    support.
  • Centre DÉtudes Ethniques des Universités
    Montréalaises (CEETUM) and the Département de
    démographie, Université de Montréal, for support
    and collaboration.

90
For further details
  • Alan Simmons, CERLAC, York University
  • asimmons_at_yorku.ca
  • Dwaine Plaza, Oregon State U., Corvalis.
    dplaza_at_oregonstate.edu
  • Victor Piché, U. of Montreal and Action Canada
    for Population and Development victor.piche_at_umontr
    eal.ca

91
Respondents Characteristics
92
Table 6. Transnational Family Contacts
93
  • END END
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com