Title: Power Distance (PDI)
1 LAC RDT Effectiveness of the UN Development
System at the Regional Level 2008 Global
RDT Oslo, March 4-6 2008
Presented by Rebeca Grynspan Regional Director,
UNDP-RBLAC
2Inclusive Membership
- Practice to include all interested Regional
Directors with management responsibilities over
the programmes in the countries and or the
region - Members should have constant and regular
involvement in RDT meetings and activities - Originally the 4 ExCom, as mandated in 2003, then
expanded from 6 members in 2006 to 14 in 2008 - For RC Appraisal, only those with supervisory
function over staff in the country concerned and
generally the same grade or above those being
appraised (standard practice).
3 RDT LAC EXPERIENCE
- Currently 14 regular members
- UNDP,
- UNFPA
- UNICEF
- WFP,
- PAHO/WHO
- ECLAC
- OCHA
- UNIFEM
- UNAIDS,
- ILO,
- UNEP,
- OHCHR,
- UNOPs,
- UNHCR,
FAO, UN Habitat, UNESCO have participated in
particular meetings depending on agenda
4LAC RDT Mission
- MISSION Enhancement of UN system-wide coherence
at the regional level and support of UNCTs at the
country level to deliver as one to achieve
sustainable human development for all. - TCPR 2007 Â
- Reiterating the importance of the development of
national capacities to eradicate poverty and
pursue sustained and equitable economic growth
and sustainable development as a central goal of
the development cooperation of the United Nations
system.
5 RDT LAC Enhancing effectiveness and efficiency
- Programmatic Support to UNCTs
- a) QSA and oversight for CCA/UNDAF process
(Ecuador, Haiti, Venezuela in 07, Argentina,
Guatemala in 08), joint missions, training, etc - b) Support to specific countries (Haiti,
Colombia, Bolivia, Uruguay) regular RDT
discussion item and follow-up. - c) Focus on sub-national inequalities and
excluded groups (eg. Indigenous, afro-descendant,
women) - d) Focus on sub-regional and cross border issues
- Operational
- RDT Secretariat
- Regional Co-location Panama Regional Center
- Partnerships
- Collaboration with regional/sub-regional bodies
(CARICOM, Ibero-America Summit, Summit of the
Americas, OAS, IDB,CEPREDENAC, CDERA, Intl NGOs
eg IFRC)
6LAC RDT Functional Structure
- Strategic Programme Support and guidance to
specific countries in sensitive situations.
Integrated support on the MDGs, HIV/AIDS,
CCA/UNDAF , Delivering as One UN, and other
emerging issues, support on joint programming,
and capacity building for UN Country Teams - Appraisal, Accountability, Feedback and Support -
Resident Coordinator/UN Country Team performance
and UNCT work plans - Interagency support to crises and emergencies
Regional IASC/Crisis Prevention , Preparedness,
Response and Recovery development of REDLAC
regional coordination, REDHUM information
exchange - Operational Support joint offices, UN presence
and operations in selected countries .
72008 LAC Regional Leadership Structure
Regional Directors Team Latin America Caribbean
RDT Secretariat
4 MAIN FUNCTIONS OF THE RDT LEADING UN
REFORM IN THE REGION
- Interagency support to
- crisis and emergencies
- Emergency response
- Support Resource Mob.
- Assist interagency coord. (IASC, REDLAC)
- Operational Support
- Common services
- Common Premises
- Joint Offices
8From Process to Substance
- Agreement on collaborative work on 3 regional
priority MDGs - Child malnutrition
- Child/infant mortality
- Maternal mortality
- ECLAC led IA analysis for advocacy ID best
practices - Next regional report sustainable development or
employment - HIV/AIDS
- Mainstreaming the decent work agenda
- Follow up on Declaration for the Rights of
Indigenous Peoples - Focus on national ownership and capacity building
in UNDAF (TCPR 07 reiterated)
9Panama Regional Center
- LAC RDT is establishing a regional common
premises for co-location of regional entities in
Panama City, City of Knowledge to increase
collaboration and efficiency (TCPR) - Feasibility Study by IA Group
- RDT Agencies agreed on Panama as its regional
center - Endorsement by UNDG Chair Dec 2006
- SG Declared Panama the Regional Hub June 2007
- Presentation to donors and high level UN
Officials Feb 08 - Currently hosted in the City of Knowledge
regional offices of UNICEF, WFP, OCHA, OHCHR,
UNAIDS, UNEP, UNOPS soon UNFPA, UNDP regional
programmes. - sub-regional offices of IFAD and DSS, and other
regional and sub-regional programmes and units
(PAHO/WHO Emergency and Disasters Program FAO
regional programs, etc) - Greening the center
10Lessons Learned
- To engage agencies in RDT, it was important to
work on a shared vision on the priorities of the
region. - MIC status and inequality
- Importance of RDT activities beyond regular RDT
meetings - RDT meets with RCs (cluster meeting)
- Joint Country Missions (Uruguay, Guyana/Suriname)
- Joint Participation in Regional Meetings
(HIV/AIDS conf. etc) - Working Groups and shared responsibilities
11Challenges
Regional Coordination/RDT is tasked but not
resourced
- Coordination demands considerable time and
effort -there are clear limits if there are not
additional resources - Need more dedicated and sustainable resources
allocated to regional level support resources
should be assigned at the global level for
regional coordination purposes, it can not be
solved at the regional level, especially in MIC
region where our core resources are being
depleted. - Need to balance between agencies involvement in
RDT work without creating big structures. - RDT should support UNCT and not add an
additional layer. - Quality Support needs to be improved and extended
beyond design to implementation more knowledge
sharing , training and more experienced people
involved at the agency level to support UNCTs - More need to demonstrate value added of
coordination/support. - Need for further consultation with RDT before
important decisions or guidelines are established
and disseminated. - Systematization of messages/communications from
highest levels through out and among agencies (to
all agency staff).
12Challenges in working in regional Middle Income
Countries
- TCPR 2007
- recognizes that middle-income developing
countries still face significant challenges in
the area of poverty eradication and that efforts
to address those challenges should be supported
in order to ensure that achievements made to date
are sustained, including through support to the
effective development of comprehensive
cooperation policies