Title: Its About Time
1Its About Time
- Ian Morison
- Gresham Professor of Astronomy
2Time is natures way of preventing everything
happening at once.
3Local Solar Time
4Sundials
5(No Transcript)
6Water Clock
7Pendulum Clocks
- Whilst still a student, in 1602, Galileo
observed the swing of a lamp in Pisa Cathedral
and timed it with his pulse.
8Galileos Clock
9Huygens Clock
10Temperature Compensated Pendulums
11(No Transcript)
12Local Time Across the UK
13(No Transcript)
14Greenwich Mean Time
- As the Earths orbit is slightly elliptical and
the Earths axis is inclined to the plane of the
Solar System, the length of the day changes from
day to day.
15Variation in the Length of the Solar Day
16- Clocks are set to run so that 24 hrs is the
average length of the day over one year. - This means that
- The Sun is not usually due south at midday.
- Sunrise and sunset are not equally spaced about
midday.
17The Analema
18(No Transcript)
19Equation of Time
20An observation.
- The earliest sunset is around December 12th.
- - 1552 (London)
- The latest sunrise is around December 30th.
- - 0806 (London)
- Evenings are getting lighter, but mornings
continue to get darker after Christmas. -
-
21 A lunar problem
- The problem is that, over time, due to the tidal
forces of the Moon, the Earths rotations rate is
gradually slowing - this means that the length
of time defined by the second is increasing! - (But short term speeding up occurs too.)
22Ephemeris Time
- For a while, the definition of the second was
tied down to the motion of the Earth around the
Sun rather than the rotation of the Earth. - This was known as Ephemeris Time (ET).
-
- In 1956 the IAU recommended that the second be
defined as 1/31,556,925.9747 of a year as
measured from one spring equinox to the next.
23Universal Time
- GMT was formally replaced by Universal Time (UT)
in 1928. - In fact, Britain has never legally moved from
GMT to UT! - But it doesnt matter as GMT is identical to UT.
24Atomic Clocks
- Actually Atomic Frequency Standards but, by
dividing down by an appropriate amount, one can
get one tick per second which can be counted to
make a clock.
25Hydrogen Maser
26(No Transcript)
27NPL Caesium Beam Clock
- Louis Essen (right)
- Jack Parry (left)
28(No Transcript)
29(No Transcript)
30Caesium Atomic Fountain
- Lasers are use to bring the caesium atoms to a
virtual standstill. - 5 parts in 1016 accuracy!
- 1 second in 60 million years.
31Atomic Time
- In 1967 the definition of the second was changed
to one based on a Caesium Beam Atomic Frequency
Standard -
- The second is the duration of 9,192,631,770
periods of the radiation corresponding to the
transition between the two hyperfine levels of
the ground state of the caesium 133 atom.
32Leap Seconds
- It may well be that the definition of the second
was not quite right as, even though the rotation
rate of the Earth is not changing much at the
moment, we are having to insert quite a number of
leap seconds. - This is usually done on the first of January when
the accumulated time difference between the time
measured by the atomic clocks and the Sun differs
by around a second, so bringing solar and atomic
time back in step.
33- Since the time definition was changed, 22 leap
seconds have had to be added, about one every 18
months, but there were none between 1998 and 2005
showing the slowdown is not particularly regular.
- Had Atomic Time been defined as 9192,631,937
cycles instead of 9192,631,770, only six leap
seconds would have been needed!
34Pulsars - the best natural clocks in the universe
35M1The Crab Nebula
36(No Transcript)
37Rotating Beam
38The Crab Pulsar
39Globular Cluster 47 Tucanae
40- One of the best pulsar clocks known at the
present time is 171307 which has been "spun up"
by matter falling onto it from a companion white
dwarf star.
41- It now has a pulse period of 4.57 milliseconds -
spinning 218.8 times per second - and is
currently slowing down at a rate of 200
nanoseconds in 12 years. That is a precision of
one part in 1,892,160,000,000 better than one
part in 1013!
42Harrisons Clocks
43Corpus Clock
44Synchronising Time
- Not as easy as you might think!
45Edinburgh Castle One Oclock Gun
- At opposite ends of the Royal Mile.
-
- Edinburgh Castle
- Holyrood House
46Edinburgh Castle One Oclock Gun
- Sound takes 5 seconds to travel one mile.
-
- Edinburgh Castle
- Holyrood House
47Edinburgh Castle One Oclock Gun
-
- Which is why the Queens clocks will be 5
seconds slow!
- Edinburgh Castle
- Holyrood House
48Greenwich Time
49- In 1852 Charles Shepherd installed a new clock
outside the gate of the Royal Observatory at
Greenwich. This was an electrically operated
clock, one of the earliest ever made, and it was
controlled by a master clock mechanism inside the
main building. -
50The Bellvilles
- Rather than having people come to the observatory
to set their clocks, John Henry Belville took the
time go to the people. He would set the time
daily on a John Arnold Son chronometer then
travel around London giving the accurate time for
a small fee.
51Maria Belvillein 1890
- John Bellville died in 1856 and the role - and
the chronometer - were then taken over by his
widow Maria, the first Greenwich Time Lady.
52Ruth Belvillle
- In 1892 Maria passed the family business to her
daughter Ruth who became the most famous Time
Lady. - Every Monday, Ruth Belville visited the
observatory and had the accuracy of the
chronometer (which she called "Arnold")
certified. She then walked around London selling
on the time. She carried on this service until
the 1930s.
53Greenwich Time Ball
- In 1833 the Observatory installed a Time ball
which is dropped at precisely 1pm by an
electrical system linked to the Master Clock at
Greenwich.
54Lyttelton Time Ball
55Radio Controlled Clocks
- MSF Time signals are now transmitted from Anthorn
in Cumbria
56Anthorn MSF Transmitter
57There is still a time delay
- Anthorn to London 480 km distance
- Time delay 480 / 3 x 105 seconds
- 0.0016 seconds
- 1.6 milliseconds
-
58 GPS signals
59(No Transcript)
60Cosmic Time
- How accurately can our clocks measure the time
scale of the universe?
61Albert Einstein
62Time Dilation
- How might the fact that the Earth and hence our
clocks are moving through space reduce the
passage of time as compared to a clock at rest to
the universe as a whole?
63- The Earth is Orbiting the Sun at 30 km/sec
- The Sun is orbiting the Galaxy at 220 km/sec
- The Galaxy will also be moving through space
can we measure the combined speed?
64Penzias and Wilson
- Discovered the radiation left over from the Big
Bang called the Cosmic Microwave Background
(CMB).
65COBE
- Measured the temperature across the sky to great
precision.
66 67- We are moving through space at 650 km/sec in the
direction of the constellation Leo.
68How much will this slow down time?
- Let us make a very simple clock and see what
happens.
69A Photon Clock
- Our fundamental time period, t1, is given by
- t1 2d / c
70A moving clock
71- By Pythagoras l ((2d)2
(vt2)2)1/2 -
- So the time interval between each tick, t2, will
then be given by - t2 l / c
((4d2 v2t22) / c2 )1/2 - Squaring both sides and cross multiplying gives
- t22c2 4d2 v2t22
- We can now relate t2 and t1 to v by
substituting for d from above using - d2
t12 c2 / 4, giving, - t22c2 t12 c2
v2t22 - and so,
- t22 (c2 - v2) t12 c2
-
- so, finally,
- t2 / t1 c2 / sqrt (c2 -
v22)
72t2 / t1 1 / sqrt(1 - v2 / c2)
- Only significant as v approaches c.
73- We can now enter our speed with respect to the
universe, 650 km/sec, into this equation and get
the ratio 1.0000023. -
- This is exceedingly small so, to a very good
approximation, our clocks can be used to measure
the time scale of the universe. -
- But we should not ignore a consequence of
Einsteins General Theory of relativity
74Gravitational Time Dilation
75Photon Clock in a spacecraft moving at a steady
speed
- A photon clock in the spacecraft will run slow.
76A photon clock in an accelerating spacecraft
- The photon crosses the craft in a curved path.
- This will be longer than if the spacecraft were
not accelerating. - So there is additional time dilation caused by
the acceleration.
77Constant Speed
78Accelerating
- Astronauts feet will rest on the floor and
become aware that he has weight.
79- If the acceleration of the spacecraft was the
same as the value of g (the acceleration due to
gravity) at the surface of the Earth your
apparent weight would be exactly the same and you
could not tell the difference between being in
the spacecraft or standing on the Earth.
80- Einstein pointed out that there is no way of
distinguishing between the two scenarios. The
acceleration due to gravity that we experience
due to the mass of an object like the Earth is
exactly equivalent in its effects to those
experienced by those within an accelerating frame
of reference. - This observation became the basis of his General
Theory of Relativity.
81- If so, we should thus expect that, in the
presence of matter - light will follow curved lines through space, not
straight ones. - the passage of time will be slowed.
- This is Gravitational Time Dilation.
82- Due to this effect, clocks on the Earths surface
run slow compared to a clock in free space by
700 picoseconds per second which is the order of
1 part in 10-9. This is a far smaller effect
than caused by our passage through space and can
thus be ignored when we measure cosmic time.
83NIST, Boulder,at 1650m altitude
- NIST-7 will gain 15.6 nsec per day relative to a
clock at sea level.
84The Global Positioning System
85(No Transcript)
86Atomic Clocks in GPS satellites
- As the Satellites are moving with respect to
those on Earth they will appear to lose 7.1
microseconds a day BUT ..
87Atomic Clocks in GPS satellites
- The atomic clocks on the satellite are in a
gravitational field that is only ¼ of that on
Earth and so they will run faster by 45.7
microseconds per day.
88GPS
- Taking account of the 7.1 microseconds slowdown
relative to clocks on Earth due to the Special
Theory of Relativity the GPS clocks would gain
38.6 microseconds a day. - This would give an error of 10 km after one day!
-
89Spacetime
- The bringing together of space and time into a 4
dimensional universe.
90Flat two-dimensional space
- d is a vector that has a length and a
direction. - d2 x2y2
- Given a length d, then, if the component in
the y direction is increased, then that in the x
direction must be reduced. - d is said to be invarient.
91Combining Time and Space
- To make things simpler (without changing the
basic idea at all) let's reduce the number of
space dimensions to one so we have just one
dimension in space (say x) along with one in
time. - This causes a problem!
92- The problem is that we cannot mix different
"dimensions" such as length and time. This is
easily got round converting time into length by
multiplying time by a speed. -
- So, instead of time, we multiply the time by a
constant speed, let's call it c, so the resultant
has the dimensions of length.
93- This should not seem too alien as we use "light
years" all the time as a unit of length, this
being a length given by multiplying the speed of
light by the number of seconds in a year.
94Spacetime Vector, s.
- As seen by different observers who may be moving
relative to one another, s is invariant but the
distance and time each measures may well be
different.
95How can one calculate s?
96- It turns out that there are only two possible
ways of combining ct and x to give the magnitude,
s, of the spacetime vector - s2 (ct)2 x2
- or
- s2 (ct)2 - x2.
97- The first is just Pythagoras again, but if this
is used to define the length of s, it turns out
that some observers would actually see the person
arrive (event B) before he had left (event A). - A problem with causality.
98- The classic example of a problem involving
causality is the "grandfather paradox" what if
one were to go back in time and kill one's own
grandfather before one's father was conceived?
99This leaves s2 (ct)2 - x2.
- This then, only leaves the second option.
However, this allows the possibility of breaching
the requirement of causality unless there is a
maximum limit to the value at which one can
travel through space - a cosmic speed limit if
you like.
100Your friend goes on a rail trip
101- As observed by your friend his position in space
will not have changed. - The time interval that he measured on his
wristwatch will be t1. So, as observed by him - s2 (c t1)2
102- As measured by you, he will have traveled a
distance given by vt2 in a time t2. Your
measurement of the spacetime vector is thus - s2 (ct2)2 - (vt2)2
103- As the spacetime vector is invariant, these must
be equal so that - (c t1)2 (ct2)2 -
(vt2)2 - This finally gives
-
- t2/ t1 1 / sqrt(1 - v2/c2) .
- This is exactly the formula we derived earlier
but only if we interpret c as the velocity of
light.
104The Twin Paradox
105- One twin leaves Earth and travels away at a high
speed and then comes back. - But in the point of view of the space twin, the
twin on Earth could be said to be moving away at
high speed. - Why should one be older than the other?
106Acceleration?
- Many authors state that the situation is not
symmetric as one twin has had to accelerate,
decelerate, change direction, accelerate and then
decelerate to get back home. - Others say that acceleration need not be invoked.
107Clocks travels at 0.6c
108Is Time Travel Possible?
109A Wormhole a shortcut from one part of the
universe to another
110My Space Trip
- I decide to go to the Andromeda galaxy in my Mk10
spaceship which is parked on the lawn outside my
lounge. My wife does not like space travel, but
would like to see what Andromeda is like. We
make a very short wormhole that goes from our
lounge into the spaceship.
111- Though this, she can see what is going on as I
accelerate away to a speed of 99.99999999999999999
9 of the speed of light and reach (as measured
on my watch) Andromeda in 4 hours!
112- You might think that the wormhole has to stretch
- it doesnt. Amazingly, general relativity
allows it to remain the same length throughout
the voyage - the further away I am, the better a
shortcut it is!
113- My wife is able to see Andromeda as the opening
of the wormhole is conveniently located besides a
porthole in the spaceship.
114- I turn the spaceship round and head home arriving
on my lawn 4 hours later and so just 8 hours
since I left. But everything is different, my
house can no longer be seen through the porthole
of the spacecraft. - I know that by travelling so close to the speed
of light on my journey I will have travelled just
over 5 million years into the future. (Andromeda
is 2.5 million light years away so, as measured
on Earth, had I travelled at the speed of light
my return journey would have taken 5 million
years.)
115- I take a look around and leave the spaceship door
open. But remember I still have my link
through the wormhole to my lounge. It is time
for the supper, so I crawl through the wormhole
and greet my wife. In doing so I travelled back
in time 5 million years!
116- My journey has turned a wormhole - a tunnel
through space - into a tunnel through time and it
has become a time machine! - People who lived 5,000,000 years into the future
at the location of my house could enter the
spaceship, crawl through the wormhole and travel
back to the present.
117A significant point
118- It is probably apparent that a significant
limitation of such a time machine (and all others
so far proposed) is that it is only possible to
go as far back in time as the initial creation of
the worm hole. This means that using such a
machine will not allow you to go back to a time
before it was created.
119- As such a time machine has yet to be constructed,
tourists from the future cannot reach this far
back in time - which perhaps explains why we do
not come across them!
120When did time begin?
- When was the origin of our Universe
121Edwin Hubble
- Showed that the
- Universe was
- expanding.
122The Hubble Diagram
- V H0x R where H0 Hubbles Constant
123An Expanding Universe
124The Hubble Time
- 1/ H0 is the age of the universe if we make
the (incorrect) assumption that the expansion has
been constant. - From Hubbles value of his constant (500
km/sec/Mpc) he got an age of 2,000 million
years. - Current best value is 72 km/sec/Mpc.
- This gives 13.6 Billion years
125A quandary
- We actually believe that the universe is 13.6 to
13.7 Billion years old. - So our uniform expansion calculation is giving
the right answer! - But the Universe has NOT expanded uniformly.
- So why is our result right????
126(No Transcript)
127More by luck than judgement!
128The Origin of Time
- Assuming, as St Augustine said The universe
began with time, not in time. Our clocks should
read 13.7 billion years. - But some cosmologists believe that our
universe was created by the coming together of
two branes moving in a higher unseen dimension
and, if so, time existed before the Big Bang and
the cosmos (that is the totality of everything)
could be far, far older.
129We may never know!
130My time has run out.