Wally Tyner - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 35
About This Presentation
Title:

Wally Tyner

Description:

Developing countries have insisted on elimination of export subsidies. Domestic Subsidies ... Japan and the EU insist on excluding a certain number of sensitive ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:30
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: wally4
Learn more at: https://ag.purdue.edu
Category:
Tags: insisted | tyner | wally

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Wally Tyner


1
PROSPECTS FOR INTERNATIONAL TRADE AGREEMENTS AND
THE WTO NEGOTIATIONS
  • Wally Tyner

2
  • Drivers of Globalization
  • Information and communication technology
  • Trade in services
  • Electronic exchange
  • Internationalization of financial markets
  • Trade is 3tri./yr. finance is 3tri./day
  • FDI more important than trade
  • Increased trade and economic interdependence
  • Read Friedmans The World is Flat

3
  • GATT Round
  • Began in 1986 in Uruguay, so it is sometimes
    called the Uruguay round
  • Concluded with an agreement 8 years later in
    1994.
  • Agreement signed in Marrakech, Morocco
  • Agriculture was included for the first time in an
    international trade agreement
  • WTO created in 1995 as one result of the
    negotiations

4
  • Fundamental GATT Principles
  • Most favored nation (MFN) treatment
  • Equal treatment of imported and domestic goods
  • Reduction of trade barriers
  • Tariffication of non-tariff barriers

5
  • Additional GATT Principles
  • Transparency
  • Consultation
  • Dispute resolution
  • Fair trade/competition
  • Safeguard measures

6
  • GATT Agreement on Agriculture Market Access
  • Non-tariff measures replaced with tariffs
  • Tariffs reduced 36 over six years by developed
    countries
  • Developing country tariffs reduced 24 percent
    over ten years
  • Least developed countries not required to reduce
    tariffs
  • Quotas to be changed to tariff-rate quotas and
    expanded to at least 5 percent of market over the
    implementation period

7
  • GATT Agreement on Agriculture Domestic Support
  • Domestic support classified in three categories
  • Green box domestic support measures that have,
    at most, a minimal impact on trade such as
    research, extension, infrastructure, and
    decoupled support payments
  • Blue box direct payments under production
    limiting programs
  • Amber box all support provided on a product
    specific basis or that links the level of the
    payment to amount or value of production

8
  • GATT Agreement on Agriculture Domestic Support
  • Green box and blue box subsidies not required to
    be reduced
  • Other measures that do not exceed 5 of the crop
    value for developed countries or 10 for
    developing countries are permitted
  • Total support not excluded above must be reduced
    20 for developed countries and 13.3 for
    developing countries
  • Least developed countries not required to make
    reductions

9
Representative Farm in Central France Income
from the Market and Direct Payments.
10
Government Subsidy Varies with Market Price
11
(No Transcript)
12
  • GATT Agreement on Agriculture Export Subsidies
  • Export subsidies must be reduced 36 below the
    1986-90 base period over six years
  • The quantity of subsidized exports must be
    reduced 21 over the same period
  • Developing country reductions are 2/3 those
    required of developed countries and over a ten
    year period

13
  • GATT Agreement on Agriculture Sanitary and
    Phytosanitary
  • Members encouraged to base sanitary and
    phytosanitary measures on international standards
  • Higher standards permitted if there is a
    scientific justification or if justified on risk
    assessment

14
  • GATT Agreement on Textiles
  • General phasing in of tariff based protection of
    textiles and clothing
  • The Multi-Fiber Agreement on Textiles expires
    completely on January 1, 2005, and all protection
    is tariff based.
  • Certain safeguard measures permitted in the case
    of a surge of imports

15
  • Major GATT Problems
  • Dirty tariffication
  • Tariff-rate quotas
  • State trading
  • Lack of transparency

16
  • WTO Round
  • Seattle a rough start (1999)
  • Doha what happened? (2001)
  • Cancun what happened? (2003)
  • What the US wants
  • What Europe wants
  • What developing countries want

17
  • WTO BACKGROUND
  • This round is known as the Millennium Round, the
    Doha Round, and the Development Round
  • Political environment there are now 148 WTO
    members about twice the GATT round
  • Progress on regional agreements
  • Countries negotiate only what they would do anyway

18
  • Major WTO Negotiation Issues
  • Increased market access
  • SPS regulations
  • Export subsidies
  • Domestic agricultural subsidies
  • Labor and environmental issues

19
  • Major WTO Negotiation Issues
  • State trading
  • Intellectual property rights
  • Biotechnology
  • Transparency and consultation

20
  • Anti-dumping Levies
  • Imposition of anti-dumping duty requires
  • demonstration of dumped imports
  • material injury to a domestic industry
  • causal link between dumped imports and the injury
  • Calculation procedures too flexible
  • Developing countries could gain concessions in
    this area

21
  • SPS Regulations as Barriers
  • Most important perceived trade barrier
  • Greatest problem with EU
  • Transparency and consultation
  • Exporter quality control a must

22
  • Export Subsidies
  • Most remaining export subsidies are European, and
    they have agreed to eliminate export subsidies if
    the US eliminates export credits and marketing
    assistance
  • U.S. and Cairns group advocate eliminating all
    export subsidies
  • Developing countries have insisted on elimination
    of export subsidies

23
  • Domestic Subsidies
  • Amber box includes coupled incentives
  • Blue box includes payments in production limiting
    programs
  • Green box includes decoupled payments as well as
    many other indirect ag support measures
  • The July 2004 framework agreement maintains these
    categories but includes US counter-cyclical
    payments in blue box

24
  • Labor and Environmental Issues
  • Considerable pressure in the US and other
    developed countries to include these issues
  • Means a change from product to process
  • Private sector ahead of governments
  • Doubtful developing countries will concede to any
    significant process controls in WTO

25
  • State Trading
  • GATT agreement places some restrictions on STEs
  • STEs handle 1/3 of exports and up to 1/2 of
    imports for wheat
  • STEs perceived as a trade barrier and are on WTO
    agenda

26
  • Intellectual Property Rights
  • IPR protections should have been in place by
    January 2000 with some exceptions
  • IPR protection is very important to increasing
    the rate of investment and growth

27
  • Biotechnology and GMO Issues
  • Closely related to IPRs and SPS
  • Very contentious issues dividing the US/Canada
    and EU
  • In some ways, private sector is ahead of
    governments

28
  • Transparency and Consultation
  • Common perception that trade rules are far from
    transparent
  • Complaints of unilateral action without
    consultation
  • Requirement that all rules and changes be posted
    on a WWW site might help

29
  • WTO Round
  • What are the prospects?
  • What about regional agreements?
  • What about private sector driven trade rules?
  • What does it mean for the food and ag system?

30
What do developing countries want from the Doha
round?
  • Reduction or elimination of OECD subsidies
  • Increased market access to OECD markets
  • Reduced tariffs and increased quotas
  • Elimination of special restrictions such as
    import windows, minimum import prices, etc.
  • Elimination of non-tariff barriers such as SPS,
    and labeling and packaging rules
  • Elimination of tariff escalation

31
What do developed countries want from the Doha
round?
  • Varies significantly among the countries
  • Japan and the EU insist on excluding a certain
    number of sensitive products
  • US claims to want free trade, but our actions do
    not match our words
  • Protection of intellectual property rights is
    important

32
US Proposal this week
  • Market access phase 1 (5 years)
  • Developed countries cut tariffs 55-90, with the
    highest cuts for the highest tariffs
  • Tariff rate cap of 75
  • Up to 1 of tariff lines be permitted to have
    sensitive product treatment with TRQs
  • Developing countries have somewhat lower cuts and
    longer phase-in periods
  • All trade distortions eliminated in 10 years

33
US Proposal this week
  • Domestic support
  • US cuts amber box 60 and 83 for Japan and the
    EU
  • This difference is called harmonization because
    support is now higher in Japan and the EU
  • Blue box be limited to 2.5 of the value of ag
    production instead of 5
  • No change in green box

34
EU Proposals this week
  • Domestic support
  • 70 cut in the amber box supports
  • Reduction in de minimus support, possibly 65
  • Possible cuts in blue box
  • Market access
  • Four tariff bands with higher cuts in higher
    tariffs
  • Minimum recourse to sensitive product category
  • End all export subsidies

35
Oxfam Reaction to US Proposal
  • US says 60 reduction in amber box, but the
    reality is only about 2 because of the space
    between payment ceilings and actual payments
  • Movement of counter-cyclical payments to blue box
    means US could actually increase payments
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com